Case summaries

Slovakia - Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic, 11 September 2012, B.S. v Ministry of Interior of the Slovak Republic, 1Sža/18/2012
Country of applicant: Ivory Coast, Somalia

“If an asylum applicant is shown to be in need, and if it can be expected that an applicant’s fundamental human rights and freedoms would or might be infringed, the administrative authority must give the applicant for asylum or subsidiary protection the benefit of the doubt in relation to the facts stated by the applicant.”

Date of decision: 11-09-2012
CJEU - C-71/11 and C-99/11 Germany v Y and Z
Country of applicant: Pakistan

This cases concerns the interpretation of Article 2(c) and Article 9(1)(a) of the Qualification Directive in a case where the two Applicants are Pakistani nationals who are members of the Ahmadi religious community and fear persecution there on the basis of religion.

Date of decision: 05-09-2012
Germany - Federal Administrative Court, 4 September 2012, 10 C 13.11
Country of applicant: Turkey

1. The issue as to whether an asylum-seeker was already protected against political persecution in a third country is only relevant in terms of  the asylum application for recognition of refugee status in the context of the concept of the first country of asylum as defined in EU law in Article 29 of the Asylum Procedures Act (Articles 25 and 26 of the Asylum Procedures Directive).  

2. If the Federal Office has reached a decision on the asylum application in this case, the substantive question of the subsidiarity of refugee protection in the assessment of refugee status is no longer applicable.

Date of decision: 04-09-2012
France - National Asylum Court, 30 August 2012, M.A., no. 11026101
Country of applicant: Somalia

The situation in Somalia, in particular in the South and Central regions, should be regarded as a situation of generalised violence resulting from an internal armed conflict.  

Date of decision: 30-08-2012
Poland - Polish Council for Refugees, 23 August 2012, RdU-82/8/S/10
Country of applicant: Russia

A single woman with two illegitimate children from relationships not approved of by the family (who are Muslim) may be subject to inhuman or degrading treatment in the country of origin by the members of her family.

The particular social group within the meaning of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees is the group comprising single mothers of illegitimate children living in Muslim families and societies.

Date of decision: 23-08-2012
Poland - Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw, 8 August 2012, V SA/Wa 621/12
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The notion of “well-founded fear” has not been precisely defined. However, it is commonly accepted that it must necessarily contain two elements: a subjective element (the party has a real and credible fear of persecution) and an objective element (this fear has a basis in reality).  A person applying for refugee status should present facts and possibly evidence confirming that they were persecuted in the past or that they fear persecution upon returning to their country of origin. Other reasons for a foreigner leaving their country of origin or fearing a return to their country of origin are immaterial as regards recognition of their refugee status.

Date of decision: 08-08-2012
Czech Republic - Supreme Administrative Court, 2 August 2012, H. R. v. Ministry of the Interior, 5 Azs 2/2012-49
Country of applicant: Iraq

Conclusions on exclusion from protection are to be supported by factual findings and cannot be presumed, especially with an applicant, who through the credibility assessment, is deemed to be untrustworthy by an administrative body. Belonging to the army under Saddam Hussein might, together with the Sunni religion of the applicant, be understood as a reason for well-founded fear of persecution because of membership of a particular social group.

Date of decision: 02-08-2012
Ireland - High Court, 31 July 2012, B.J.C. (South Africa) v the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, the Refugee Applications Commissioner and the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2012] IEHC 340
Country of applicant: South Africa

The Court granted permission to the Applicant to seek judicial review of the negative decision made in a written appeal (rather than an oral appeal) in an application for refugee status made by a South African national. The decision to allow a written appeal was based on the status of South Africa as a ‘safe country,’ but because the appeal decision was based on personal credibility, the absence of an oral hearing may have been unlawful by reference to the right to an effective remedy as guaranteed by the Asylum Procedures Directive.

Date of decision: 31-07-2012
France - Council of State, 27 July 2012, n° 349824, M.B.
Country of applicant: Congo (DRC)

A social group is not formed by those of whom it consists, or even by the objective existence of characteristics ascribed to them, but by the way in which surrounding society or institutions regard them. 

Date of decision: 27-07-2012
Germany - High Administrative Court of Sachsen-Anhalt, 26 July 2012, 2 L 68/10
Country of applicant: Russia

This case concerned exclusion from refugee status on the basis of a war crime and a serious non-political crime.

A Chechen who was involved in the Second Chechen War - outside of the general combat action - in the killing and wounding of Russian soldiers and the kidnapping of a Russian officer to force the release of another Chechen is at risk of being exposed to torture or at least inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the Russian Federation. 

Date of decision: 26-07-2012