Case summaries

ECtHR - Kahadawa Arachchige and Others v. Cyprus (Application nos. 16870/11, 16874/11 and 16879/11), 19 June 2018
Country of applicant: Sri Lanka
Keywords: Detention, Return

The detention of three Sri Lankan nationals on grounds of public order before their removal from Cyprus was found to be lawful by the Court. However, the Court found that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy by which they could challenge the lawfulness of their detention, in violation of Article 5(4) ECHR.

Date of decision: 19-06-2018
Sweden - Migration Court of Appeal, 19 June 2018, UM16509 - 17
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The applicant appealed the Migration Court’s decision to dismiss his application for asylum on grounds of the availability of an internal protection alternative in the applicants home country of Afghanistan.

The Migration Court of Appeal granted the appeal as it was held that the question of internal protection can only be assessed after the court has made an individual assessment of the original grounds for protection invoked by the applicant.
 

Date of decision: 19-06-2018
Denmark - the Refugee Appeals Board’s decision of 18 June 2018
Country of applicant: China

The applicant, a Chinese citizen, feared, if she returned to China, she would be persecuted and exposed to torture by the Chinese Communist Government due to her Falun Gong activities.

The Refugee Appeals Board did not find that she was a particular profiled member of Falun Gong or that she was wanted by the Chinese Authorities as she left China legally notwithstanding that she had been detained several times for shorter periods and imprisoned for seven years during which she was exposed to torture. However, the Board found that the Chinese Authorities were aware of the applicant ‘s political positions regarding Falun Gong and the human rights situation in China due to comprehensive media activities and participation in demonstrations in Copenhagen. Therefore, after an overall assessment including the fact that the applicant had been imprisoned for seven years, the Board granted the applicant reugee status under the Danish Aliens Act Art. 7 (1).

Date of decision: 18-06-2018
ECtHR - Gaspar v Russia, Application no. 23038/15, 12 June 2018
Country of applicant: United States

The European Court of Human Rights finds Russian authorities violated an American national’s Article 8 right to respect for family life, as it had compelled her to leave Russia, where her husband and minor child were living.

Date of decision: 12-06-2018
Austria – Constitutional Court – 11. Juni 2018, E 4317/2017-11
Country of applicant: Iraq

Courts must establish the current situation of the region from which the complainant originates or which can be considered as an internal flight alternative and relate it to the individual situation of the complainant in the grounds of the decision.

In the case of a Sunni Iraqi, the lower instance court did not sufficiently consider the complainant’s region of origin, the possibility of return to that region or the possibility of internal flight. Thereby the court violated the right to equal treatment among foreigners.

 

Date of decision: 11-06-2018
Denmark - Refugee Appeals Board’s decision of 8 June 2018
Country of applicant: Somalia

The complainant, a Somali Citizen and a Sufi Muslim from Jaameel Sheen, Hiiraan Region, Somalia, had been detained and tortured by al-Shabaab due to teaching English.

Based on a consistent account in accordance with a medico-legal report from a torture investigation and country of origin information the Board found the applicant profiled in relation to al-Shabaab.

The applicant was granted subsidiary protection under the Danish Aliens Act Art. 7 (2).

Date of decision: 08-06-2018
France – Constitutional Council, 1 June 2018, N° 2018-709 Priority Question of Constitutionality (QPC)

The Constitutional Council decides on the constitutionality of the deadline to appeal against a return order, as applicable to a third-country national being detained, under paragraph 4 of Article L. 512-1 of the Code of Entry and Stay of Foreigners and the Right to Asylum (CESEDA). The Council decides hereby that the deadline proves to be too short- consequently unconstitutional- to effectively exercise the right to remedy in the context of detention.

Date of decision: 01-06-2018
CJEU - C-647/16 A.H v Préfet du Pas-de Calais, 31 May 2018

Article 26(1) of the Dublin III Regulation precludes the issuance of a transfer decision by the determining Member-State until the requested Member-State implicitly or explicitly accepts the take charge/back request.

 

Date of decision: 31-05-2018
CJEU - C-647/16 A.H v Préfet du Pas-de Calais, 31 May 2018

Article 26(1) of the Dublin III Regulation precludes the issuance of a transfer decision by the determining Member-State until the requested Member-State implicitly or explicitly accepts the take charge/back request.

 

Date of decision: 31-05-2018
Italy - Ordinary Court of Rome, RG No. 58068/2017, 25 May 2018
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The request submitted by the Italian authorities to Norway to take back the applicant would imply his immediate repatriation to his country of origin, Afghanistan, which, in the light of the Court’s reasoning, is not to be considered a safe country.

Date of decision: 25-05-2018