Case summaries

  • My search
  • Keywords
    1
Reset
Ireland - High Court, 13 December, J.K. (Uganda) v Minister for Justice and Equality, [2011] IEHC 473
Country of applicant: Uganda

The applicant was not permitted to raise a new ground of claim based on her asserted homosexuality, when she had had numerous opportunities to raise this ground of claim earlier.  The applicant was however granted leave to apply for judicial review, upon the Judge noting a factual error that had tainted the State’s earlier credibility assessment. 

Date of decision: 13-12-2011
Germany - Administrative Court Köln, 15 September 2011, 18 K 6103/10.A
Country of applicant: Guinea

An applicant from Guinea was recognised as a refugee. The court found that because of his homosexuality he faced a threat of persecution from family members. The State was unwilling or unable to provide protection.

Date of decision: 15-09-2011
Austria - Asylum Court, 24 February 2011, A4 213316-0/2008
Country of applicant: Egypt

An Egyptian transgender woman, who first underwent gender reassignment surgery and hormone treatment in Austria, was recognised as a refugee as it was accepted that there were problems with the police,  a refusal to issue her a passport using her new personal data and social issues of an intensity relevant to asylum matters.

Date of decision: 24-02-2011
Germany - Administrative Court Frankfurt / Oder, 11 November 2010, VG 4 K 772/10.A
Country of applicant: Cameroon

Refugee status was granted as the applicant was deemed at risk of persecution due to his homosexuality. The court found that homosexuals constitute a particular social group in Cameroon according to Section 60 (1) of the Residence Act / Art 10.1 (d) of the Qualification Directive. According to the Qualification Directive, sexual orientation does not only constitute an unchangeable characteristic, but is so fundamental to the identity of a person that he/she should not be forced to denounce it. That means that under the Qualification Directive it is no longer important if the applicant can persevere with abstinence in the long term. The punishment which the applicant would face due to homosexual acts in case of return does not simply constitute criminal prosecution, but is persecution in terms of Section 60 (1) Residence Act.

Date of decision: 11-11-2010
UK - Supreme Court, 7 July 2010, HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31
Country of applicant: Cameroon, Iran
Homosexuals are members of a particular social group being defined by the immutable characteristic of their sexuality.
 
Asylum should not be refused to a homosexual person on the basis that it could be considered reasonably tolerable, if returned to their home country, for him or her to deny their identity and conceal their sexuality in order to avoid being persecuted.
Date of decision: 07-07-2010
France - CNDA, 23 December 2010, Mr. K., n°08014099
Country of applicant: Algeria

In the situation which currently prevails in Algeria, while homosexuality is in some ways tolerated by society, as long as it is not explicitly expressed by the behaviour or the clothes, individuals who openly manifest their homosexuality may nevertheless be subjected to intimidation in their social environment and by the security forces. In addition, legislation punishes homosexuals by a prison sentence and a fine.

Date of decision: 23-01-2010
Italy - Trieste Court of First Instance, 8 September 2009, RG 1012/2009
Country of applicant: Benin

Intimidation, loss of employment, humiliation, personal injury inflicted for reasons of sexual orientation and national legislation penalising homosexuals qualify as acts of persecution.

Date of decision: 08-09-2009
Czech Republic - Supreme Administrative Court, 5 October 2006, A.M. v. Ministry of the Interior, 2 Azs 66/2006-52
Country of applicant: Armenia

The sexual orientation of the Applicant for asylum may, depending on circumstances and with regard to the situation in the country of origin, be considered a sign of his membership of a particular social group. The threat of injury to the Applicant for asylum as a result of actions causing psychological pressure may not be as serious as injuries that result in threats to life or freedom, but must be at least of a comparable type.

Date of decision: 05-10-2006