Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
CJEU – Case C-181/16 Gnandi, 19 June 2018
Country of applicant: Togo

Member States can issue a return decision together with, or right after, a negative decision on an asylum application at first instance, as long as they ensure that all judicial effects of the return decision are suspended during the time allowed to appeal and pending that appeal.

During that period, and despite being subjected to a return decision, an asylum applicant must enjoy all the rights under the Reception Conditions Directive. The applicant can rely upon any changes in circumstances affecting his claim that came up after the return decision, before the appeals authority.

Date of decision: 19-06-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 39,Art 7,Art 33.1,Recital 2,Recital 8,Recital (9),Article 46,Recital (2),Recital (4),Recital (6),Recital (8),Recital (9),Recital (12),Recital (24),Article 2,Article 3,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 13,1.,Article 2,Article 3
The Netherlands – Supreme Court, 29 March 2016, 14/00826

The Supreme Court has requested two preliminary rulings to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The time of onset and the determination of the duration of the suspect’s ‘undesirable declaration’, which is considered equal to an entry ban, are under discussion since this statement had already been issued before the Return Directive was operational.

Date of decision: 29-03-2016
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,Recital (2),Recital (4),Recital (6),Recital (8),Recital (10),Recital (11),Recital (14),Recital (24),Article 3,Article 7,Article 11
Greece – First Instance Administrative Court of Thessaloniki, 2014, Case No 467/2014
Country of applicant: Bangladesh

An asylum seeker, submitting his claim to a non-competent authority is considered to be staying illegally in the territory of Greece and falls within the scope of the provisions on detention of Directive 2008/115/EC and Law 3907/2011 for returning illegally staying third-country nationals for as long as his identity remains unconfirmed. The deadline for the referral of his application to the competent authorities begins when the applicant provides assistance, as dictated by his duty to cooperate, with regards to the verification of his identity.

Date of decision: 27-03-2015
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,EN - Asylum Procedures Directive, Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005,Art 4,Art 6,Art 11,Art 7,European Union Law,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,Recital (5),Recital (8),Recital (9),Article 1,Article 2,EN - Recast Qualification Directive, Directive 2011/95/EU of 13 December 2011,Article 4
CJEU - C-179/11 Cimade, Groupe d’information et de soutien des immigres (GISTI) v Ministre de l’Interieur, de L’Outre-mer, des Collectivities territorials et de l’Immigration
Country of applicant: Unknown

This case concerned the legality of a circular in French law which was challenged by two organisations on the basis that it was contrary to EU Law under the Reception Conditions Directive in so far as it excludes asylum seekers from entitlement to allowances if they are in the Dublin procedure in France. The CJEU held that the Reception Conditions Directive applies in such a scenario and therefore asylum seekers in the Dublin procedure should have access to the minimum reception conditions laid down in that Directive. This obligation ceases when the person is actually transferred to another Member State.

Date of decision: 27-09-2012
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 3,Art 35,Art 7.1,Article 1,Article 18,Recital 29,Recital (5),Recital (7),Recital (8),Article 1,Article 2,Article 3,Article 16