Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
Bulgaria, CJEU (Second Chamber), Aleb, C-718/24, 5 February 2026
Country of applicant: Syria

The safe third country ground under Article 33(2)(c) of Directive 2013/32 is optional; an application may be declared inadmissible on that basis even if the applicant qualifies for international protection, but it cannot be rejected as unfounded on that ground.

Article 38 requires national law to define criteria establishing a sufficient connection between the applicant and the third country to make transfer reasonable.

Article 38(2)(b) and (c) of Directive 2013/32 permits reliance on publicly available sources and executive lists of safe third countries, provided that national law sets out a methodology for an individualised assessment of safety and allows the applicant to challenge the existence of the required connection.

Courts hearing appeals must verify the existence of such a connection, even if national law does not expressly grant that power.

 

Date of decision: 05-02-2026
Relevant International and European Legislation: Recital (18),Recital (43),Recital (44),Recital (46),Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 10,Article 11,Article 12,Article 13,Article 14,Article 15,Article 16,Article 17,Article 18,Article 19,Article 20,Article 21,Article 22,Article 23,Article 24,Article 25,Article 26,Article 27,Article 28,Article 29,Article 30,Article 32,Article 33,Article 46,Article 2,Article 15,Article 267 § 2,Article 267 § 1 (b)