Case summaries

  • My search
  • Keywords
    1
Reset
Germany - Administrative Court Berlin, 9 June 2011, 33 K 285.10 A
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

It is in principle possible for men to be persecuted on account of their gender. However, classifying the punishment for extramarital sex in Afghanistan as persecution on account of both membership of the group of men and the group of women would cover the entire society and renders the definition meaningless. Therefore, the applicant was not granted refugee status but his deportation was prohibited under Section 60 (2) of the Residence Act / Art 15 (b) of the Qualification Directive.

Date of decision: 09-06-2011
Belgium – Council for Alien Law Litigation, 9 June 2011, Nr. 62.867
Country of applicant: Niger
This case concerned the assessment of the risk of being subjected to slavery on return. The CALL held that slavery is sufficiently grave by its nature to constitute persecution. The Court further added that the prohibition of slavery is an absolute and non-derogable right and that slaves can be considered as a particular social group.
Date of decision: 09-06-2011
Belgium – Council for Alien Law Litigation, 28 January 2009, Nr. 22.175
Country of applicant: Guinea

The Council for Alien Law Litigation (CALL) held that Art 48/5, §3 of the Belgian Aliens Law, which refers to the principles of internal protection alternative and protection within a country of origin, is in principle applicable in cases where the threat comes from a non-state agent. In a case where the threat of persecution comes from a state agent, the decision-maker should explain why it believes that this provision is applicable nonetheless.

Date of decision: 09-06-2011
Germany - High Administrative Court Sachsen-Anhalt, 25 May 2011, 3 L 374/09
Country of applicant: Syria

A stateless Kurd from Syria was not recognised as a refugee. The court held:

  1. The denial of re-entry of stateless Kurds is not to be considered political persecution because a general institutional practice cannot be detected which is aimed against ethnic Kurds in a manner that is relevant to asylum grounds (Art 10 of the Qualification Directive).
  2. Whether the legal practice of Syrian legislation on citizenship and the denial of re-entry are part of a restrictive policy towards Kurds, and support the aims of the State of Syria in respect of its settlement policy, is not important when determining political persecution under Section 60 (1) sentence (5) of the Residence Act in connection with Art. 9 and 10 Qualification Directive.
Date of decision: 25-05-2011
Netherlands - District Court Haarlem, 25 May 2011, AWB 10/44949
Country of applicant: Iran

Restriction of the right to attend church is an act of persecution and therefore a violation of Art 10 of the Qualification Directive.

Date of decision: 25-05-2011
Sweden – Migration Court, 16 May 2011, UM 27323-10
Country of applicant: Iraq

Greater caution is required when applying an internal protection alternative to families with children than to adults without children. The Kurdish controlled areas of northern Iraq cannot be considered as a relevant and reasonable flight option for a Christian family, as the Migration Board was not able to show that there currently is no requirement for sponsorship, either to enter or to legally establish oneself there.

An internal protection alternative must be relevant and reasonable. Relevant means that the location is accessible to the individual in a practical, safe and legal manner. The individual must also have access to effective protection at the location. That the option should be reasonable means that an individual assessment of the individual's ability to settle in a new location should be made, and of whether he or she has a social network. There ought also to be a realistic possibility for the individual to support himself and be able to live in a way that does not involve unnecessary suffering or hardship.

Date of decision: 16-05-2011
France - CNDA, 29 April 2011, Miss E., n°10012810
Country of applicant: Nigeria

Prostitutes who come from the State of Edo, and who are both victims of human trafficking and anxious to extricate themselves actively from these networks, form a group whose members are, by reason of these two common characteristics which define them, likely to be subjected to persecution within the meaning of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Refugee Convention, without being able to avail themselves of the protection of the Nigerian authorities. They are members of a particular social group.

Date of decision: 29-04-2011
Belgium – Council for Alien Law Litigation, 29 April 2011, Nr. 60.622
Country of applicant: Guinea
The CALL held that the examination of credibility should not overshadow the actual question of whether the applicant has reasons to fear persecution. In this case, refugee status was granted on the basis of a well-founded fear of persecution, by way of a forced marriage and a second excision (Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)).
Date of decision: 29-04-2011
Sweden – Migration Court, 27 April 2011, UM 20800-10
Country of applicant: Iran

This case concerned the risk that Christian converts face in Iran. The applicants, from Iran, were granted a residence permit and refugee status because their Christian belief came to the Iranian authorities' attention.

Date of decision: 27-04-2011
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 22 April 2011, 17.K30.864/2010/18
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The applicant could not substantiate the individual elements of his claim with respect to his well-founded fear of a blood feud; however, he was able to satisfy the criteria for subsidiary protection. As a result of the armed conflict that was ongoing in the respective province in his country of origin (Ghazni, Afghanistan), the high intensity of the indiscriminate violence was deemed to be sufficient to be a threatening factor to the applicant’s life. As a result, the criteria of subsidiary protection were fulfilled.

Date of decision: 22-04-2011