Case summaries

  • My search
  • Country of applicant
    1
Reset
UK - Court of Appeal, 24 June 2009, QD & AH (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Intervening [2009] EWCA Civ 620
Country of applicant: Iraq

In this case the Court of Appeal considered the interpretation of Art 15 (c) of the Qualification Directive applying the decision of the CJEU in Elgafaji (C-465/07; 17 February, 2009).

Date of decision: 24-06-2009
Netherlands - AJDCoS, 25 May 2009, 200702174/2/V2
Country of applicant: Iraq

Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive only offers protection in exceptional circumstances where there is a high level of indiscriminate violence.

Date of decision: 25-05-2009
France - Council of State, 15 May 2009, Miss K., n°292564
Country of applicant: Iraq

As soon as one persecution ground (in this case religion) exists and the other conditions for qualifying for refugee status are fulfilled, refugee status must be recognised rather than subsidiary protection, including in a context of generalised violence. 

Date of decision: 15-05-2009
Germany - Federal Administrative Court, 21 April 2009, 10 C 11.08
Country of applicant: Iraq

This case concerned the assessment of "group" persecution against Arab Sunnites in Iraq. In order to establish the existence of group persecution it is necessary to at least approximately determine the number of acts of persecution and to link them to the entire group of persons affected by that persecution ( "density of persecution"). Acts of persecution not related to the characteristics relevant to asylum (reasons for persecution) are not to be included.

Date of decision: 21-04-2009
Belgium – Council of State, 18 March 2009, Nr. 191.585
Country of applicant: Iraq
This case considered whether or not an applicant should be granted a right of appeal, where he had committed fraud in his asylum claim. The Council of State ruled that the general principle of law “fraus omnia corrumpit” (fraud corrupts everything) does not preclude the fact that an applicant has a lawful interest in order to appeal a negative decision of the Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (CGRS) with the Council for Alien Law Litigation (CALL), unless it transpired that the appeal itself was tainted by fraud.
Date of decision: 18-03-2009
Hungary - Metropolitan Court, 16 March 2009, 24. K. 33.913/2008/9
Country of applicant: Iraq

The Court replaced the decision of the OIN to allow the Applicant to remain on non-refoulement grounds (i.e. tolerated status), with a decision to grant the Applicant subsidiary protection status on the grounds that he would be at risk of serious harm on return to his home country (indiscriminate violence).

Date of decision: 16-03-2009
Czech Republic - Supreme Administrative Court, 13 March 2009, H.A.Š. v Ministry of Interior, 5 Azs 28/2008-68
Country of applicant: Iraq

The case concerned an application for international protection by an Iraqi national. The application was dismissed on the grounds of a failure to establish that his life or person was threatened by reason of indiscriminate violence. The applicant failed to demonstrate individual risk.  

Date of decision: 13-03-2009
CJEU - C-465/07 Meki Elgafaji, Noor Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie
Country of applicant: Iraq

This preliminary ruling concerned the interpretation and application of Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive and the protection offered under this provision.

Date of decision: 17-02-2009
Germany - Administrative Court München, 10 December 2008, M 8 K 07.51028
Country of applicant: Iraq

The applicant was not granted refugee status or protection against deportation in accordance with Section 60 (2) through (7) of the Residence Act. The court found:

  1. A single woman with a “Western” lifestyle is not at risk of gender-based political persecution by non-State actors in Iraq.
  2. The risk of the applicant becoming a victim of an honour killing (or respectively a weaker, non-life threatening disciplinary measure by her clan) because of her moral conduct, disapproved by her clan, constitutes an increased individual risk. However, this risk is not the result of arbitrary violence, but constitutes a typical general risk.
Date of decision: 10-12-2008
Sweden - Migration Court of Appeal, 28 October 2008, UM 2397-08
Country of applicant: Iraq

The conditions for asylum seekers in Greece were at the time of the decision not of such a character that it would prevent transferring asylum seekers according to the Dublin Regulation.

Date of decision: 28-10-2008