Austria - Constitutional Court, 7 October 2010, U694/10
| Country of Decision: | Austria |
| Country of applicant: | Afghanistan |
| Court name: | Constitutional Court |
| Date of decision: | 07-10-2010 |
| Citation: | U694/10 |
Keywords:
| Keywords |
|
Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
{ return; } );"
>
Description
A form of serious harm for the purposes of the granting of subsidiary protection. The Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in Celibici defined cruel or inhuman treatment as ‘an intentional act or omission, that is an act which, judged objectively, is deliberate and not accidental, that causes serious mental or physical suffering or injury or constitutes a serious attack on human dignity.’ “Ill-treatment means all forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, including corporal punishment, which deprives the individual of its physical and mental integrity." |
|
Reception conditions
{ return; } );"
>
Description
The full set of measures that Member States grant to asylum seekers in accordance with Directive 2003/9/EC. |
|
Health (right to)
{ return; } );"
>
Description
Member States shall ensure that applicants receive the necessary health care which shall include, at least, emergency care and essential treatment of illness. Member States shall also ensure that beneficiaries of refugee or subsidiary protection status have access to health care under the same eligibility conditions as nationals of the Member State that has granted such statuses. |
|
Vulnerable person
{ return; } );"
>
Description
Persons in a vulnerable position, such as"Minors, unaccompanied minors, disabled people, elderly people, pregnant women, single parents with minor children and persons who have been subjected to torture, rape or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence. Note: Directive 2011/36/EU defines a position of vulnerability as a situation in which the person concerned has no real or acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse involved." |
Headnote:
The Constitutional Court allowed an appeal against a decision to expel a single mother and her three minor children to Greece. It is necessary that Greece ensure appropriate accommodation will be provided for vulnerable persons in each case. The applicants are vulnerable persons and the lack of assurance from Greece, therefore, gave rise to a real risk of a violation of Art 3 ECHR.
Facts:
The applicant is a single mother with three minor children; the youngest child is only nine months old. She entered the European Union via Greece. When she applied for asylum in Austria, her application was rejected and she received an expulsion order to Greece. The Asylum Court agreed with this decision. The applicant appealed to the Constitutional Court.
Decision & reasoning:
The Constitutional Court allowed the appeal.
The Court stated there is serious a risk of a violation of Art 3 ECHR in Greece because accommodation might not be provided. The applicant and her children are vulnerable persons. While there is the possibility of appropriate accommodation being provided, a premonitory assurance was not given. It is necessary that Greece ensure appropriate accommodation for vulnerable person in each case. The applicant and her children fall within the category of vulnerable persons. There is, therefore, a real risk of a violation of Art 3 ECHR if the applicant and her children are sent back to Greece.
Outcome:
The appeal was allowed.
Subsequent proceedings:
The family was admitted to the procedure on the merits.
Observations/comments:
Below is a list of similar Austrian decisions in relation to vulnerable persons and Dublin procedures with Greece:
- Afghan family with three children, mother pregnant (13 December 2010, U1441/10)
- Afghan family with three children, mother has a psychological disease (1 December 2010, U1523/09)
- A single mother with four minors (26 September 2011, U223/10)
The Consitiutional Court of Austria is only allowed to assess the points of law based on the information given during the procedure before the lower authorities. It is prohibited to introduce new facts or circumstances before the Constitutional Court.
This summary has been reproduced and adapted for inclusion in EDAL with the kind permission of Forum Réfugiés-Cosi, coordinator of Project HOME/2010/ERFX/CA/1721 "European network for technical cooperation on the application of the Dublin II regulation" which received the financial support of the European Refugee Fund.
Relevant International and European Legislation:
Cited National Legislation:
| Cited National Legislation |
| Austria - Asylgesetz (Asylum Act) 2005 - § 10 |
| Austria - Asylgesetz (Asylum Act) 2005 - § 5 |
Follower Cases:
| Follower Cases |
| Austria - Constitutional Court, 22 September 2011, U1734/10 |

