Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
CJEU – C-233/18 Haqbin, 12 November 2019
Country of applicant: Afghanistan
A sanction imposed in response of serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre or of seriously violent behaviour on behalf of an applicant for international protection cannot include withdrawal of material reception conditions relating to housing, food or clothing, even if it is temporary. Authorities should take into particular consideration any such sanction in cases of vulnerable applicants and unaccompanied minors.
Date of decision: 12-11-2019
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 1,Article 24,Recital (35),Article 2,Article 8,Article 17,Article 20,Article 21,Article 22,Article 23,Article 24
ECtHR - Abdullahi Elmi and Aweys Abubakar v. Malta, Application No. 25794/13 and 28151/13, 22 February 2017
Country of applicant: Somalia

The applicants although minors were detained in a detention facility where they were mixed with adults. The detention lasted until the Maltese government determined (in a process that took 8 months) that they were minors.

Moreover, the harsh conditions in the detention facilities amounted to inhuman or degrading treatment.

Date of decision: 09-01-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,International Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3,Article 5,Article 8,Article 34,Article 37,Article 44,Article 45,EN - Recast Reception Conditions Directive, Directive 2013/33/EU of 26 June 2013,Article 11,Article 24,UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
Germany – Federal Constitutional Court, 29 August 2017, 2 BvR 863/17
Country of applicant: Syria

The right to be heard entails the obligation of the court to take note of the arguments put forward by the parties and to take these arguments into consideration when taking its decision. While this does not require the court to explicitly address every single fact put forward by the parties, the grounds of the decision have to refer to the essential issues raised by such facts.

In case of a single mother and her four minor children facing deportation to a country where beneficiaries of international protection had to live under difficult conditions, these personal circumstances of the applicants are of key importance to the legal evaluation. Independently of the question, whether deportations to Bulgaria were, in light of the current conditions, generally permissible, the provisions of Art. 21 et seqq. of the Reception Conditions Directive clearly stipulated that the concerns of families with children had to be given particular consideration.

Consequently, under such circumstances a court was required to specifically set out why it assumed that the family would be guaranteed suitable accommodation that excluded the possibility of health risks and met the needs of a family with children. Otherwise, the decision amounts to an infringement of the applicant’s right to be heard under Art. 103 (1) of the Basic Law.

Date of decision: 29-08-2017
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,EN - Recast Reception Conditions Directive, Directive 2013/33/EU of 26 June 2013,Article 21,Article 22,Article 23,Article 24,Article 25,Article 26,Article 27,Article 28,Article 29,Article 30,Article 31,Article 32,Article 33,Article 34