Case summaries
CJEU - C‑63/15, Mehrdad Ghezelbash v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Country of applicant:
Iran
Keywords:
Effective access to procedures, Effective remedy (right to), Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Personal interview, Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect), Dublin Transfer
Dublin III is characterised by the introduction or re-fortification of rights and mechanisms which guarantee the involvement of the asylum seeker in the determination process. Article 27(1) when read in conjunction with Recital 19 is ,therefore, to be interpreted as allowing an asylum seeker to appeal a transfer decision on grounds that the Chapter III allocation criteria were incorrectly applied.
Date of decision:
07-06-2016
Relevant International and European Legislation:
European Union Law,EN - Dublin II Regulation, Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003,Article 19,EN - Dublin III Regulation, Council Regulation (EC) No. 604/2013 of 26 June 2013 (recast Dublin II Regulation),Article 1,Article 3,Article 4,Article 5,Article 7,Article 9,Article 12,Article 19,Article 21,Article 22,Article 26,Article 27,Article 29,Article 36,Article 37,Article 40