Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
ECtHR-C.G. and others v. Bulgaria, Application no. 1365/07, 24 July 2008
Country of applicant: Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights found that the expulsion of a Turkish national from Bulgaria violated his right to respect for private and family life (Article 8) and his right to an effective remedy (Article 13). What is more, it held that the Bulgarian authorities did not abide with the procedural safeguards relating to the expulsion of nationals. 

Date of decision: 24-07-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 3,Article 8,Article 13,Article 29,Article 34,Article 35,Article 36,Article 41,Article 44
ECtHR – Saadi v. Italy, Application No. 37201/06, 28 February 2008
Country of applicant: Tunisia

The applicant, a Tunisian national, having served a sentence in Italy on the charge, among others, of criminal conspiracy, faced deportation from Italy to Tunisia, where he risked ill-treatment.

The Court found that the deportation of the applicant to Tunisia would constitute a violation of Article 3 ECHR. The absolute nature of Article 3 meant that the conduct of the applicant was irrelevant for the purposes of Article 3.

Date of decision: 28-02-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: 1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1,Art 32,Art 33,ECHR (Frist Protocol),International Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3,Article 6,Article 8,Article 15,Article 27,Article 29,Article 30,Article 34,Article 35,Article 36,Article 41,Article 45,ECHR (Fourth Protocol),UN Convention against Torture,Art. 3
ECtHR- Tuquabo-Tekle And Others v The Netherlands, Application no. 60665/00, 1 March 2006
Country of applicant: Ethiopia

The European Court of Human Rights found that the authorities in the Netherlands had violated the right to family life of five Ethiopian nationals by not allowing them to be reunited in the Netherlands.

Date of decision: 01-03-2006
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 1,Article 8,Article 31,Article 34,Article 41
ECtHR - Shamayev and Others v Georgia and Russia, Application no.36378/02, 12 October 2005
Country of applicant: Georgia, Russia, Russia (Chechnya)

Thirteen applicants from Georgia and Russia (of Chechen origin) alleged that their extradition to Russia, where capital punishment was not abolished, exposed them to the risk of death, torture or ill-treatment contrary to Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention. The applicants also alleged that they had been subject to violence and ill-treatment by fifteen members of the Georgian Ministry of Justice’s special forces in Tbilisi Prison no.5., on the night of 3 and 4 October 2002. Their legal representatives asserted that Mr Aziev, one of the extradited applicants, had died as a result of ill-treatment inflicted on him. The applicants also complained of violations of Article 2 and 3, Article 5 §§ 1, 2 and 4, Article 13 in conjunction with articles 2 and 3, Article 34, Articles 2, 3 and 6 §§ 1,2 and 3 and Article 38 § 1 of the Convention. 

Date of decision: 12-04-2005
Relevant International and European Legislation: Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 2,Article 3,Article 5,Article 6,Article 13,Article 32,Article 34,Article 35,Article 38,Article 41,ECHR (Fourth Protocol),Art 4
ECtHR - Shamsa v Poland, Application Nos 45355/99 and 45357/99, 27 November 2003
Country of applicant: Libya
Keywords: Detention

The European Court of Human Rights found that there had been a violation of Article 5(1) ECHR through the unlawful detention of two Libyan nationals by the Polish authorities after the expiration of an expulsion order due to be executed within 90 days.  

Date of decision: 27-11-2003
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Reception Conditions Directive, Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 5,Article 25,Article 26,Article 27,Article 34,Article 41,Article 43,Article 44,Article 52,Article 59,EN - Recast Reception Conditions Directive, Directive 2013/33/EU of 26 June 2013
ECtHR - Sen v. the Netherlands, Application no. 31465/96, 21 December 2001
Country of applicant: Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights found an infringement of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on account of the rejection of their application for a residence permit for their daughter.

Date of decision: 21-12-2001
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 8,Article 25,Article 27,Article 36,Article 41
ECtHR - Hilal v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 45276/99, 6 June 2001
Country of applicant: Tanzania

The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the proposed expulsion of a Tanzanian national from the United Kingdom to Tanzania will expose him to inhuman and degrading treatment, in violation of Article 3 of the Convention.

Date of decision: 06-06-2001
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 3,Article 6,Article 8,Article 13,Article 27,Article 31,Article 41,Article 44
ECtHR - Velikova v. Bulgaria , Application no.41488/98, 18 May 2000
Country of applicant: Bulgaria

Applicant complained under Articles 2, 6, 13 and 14 of the Convention in relation to the death of her partner while in police custody.

Date of decision: 18-05-2000
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 2,Article 3,Article 6,Article 13,Article 14,Article 25,Article 38,Article 41