Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
ECtHR- A. and others v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 3455/05, 19 February 2009
Country of applicant: Algeria, France, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia

The European Court of Human Rights found a violation of Article 5 para 1 (f), 4 and 5 with regards to some of the eleven applicants in this case, who were detained as suspected terrorists by UK authorities.

Date of decision: 19-02-2009
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 3,Article 5,Article 6,Article 8,Article 13,Article 14,Article 15,Article 27,Article 30,Article 34,Article 35,Article 36,Article 41
ECtHR – Saadi v. Italy, Application No. 37201/06, 28 February 2008
Country of applicant: Tunisia

The applicant, a Tunisian national, having served a sentence in Italy on the charge, among others, of criminal conspiracy, faced deportation from Italy to Tunisia, where he risked ill-treatment.

The Court found that the deportation of the applicant to Tunisia would constitute a violation of Article 3 ECHR. The absolute nature of Article 3 meant that the conduct of the applicant was irrelevant for the purposes of Article 3.

Date of decision: 28-02-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: 1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1,Art 32,Art 33,ECHR (Frist Protocol),International Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3,Article 6,Article 8,Article 15,Article 27,Article 29,Article 30,Article 34,Article 35,Article 36,Article 41,Article 45,ECHR (Fourth Protocol),UN Convention against Torture,Art. 3
ECtHR - Said v. the Netherlands, Application no. 2345/02, 5 July 2005
Country of applicant: Eritrea

The European Court of Human Rights held that the expulsion of an Eritrean deserter to Eritrea would give rise to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention.

Date of decision: 05-07-2005
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 2,Article 3,Article 6,Article 13,Article 27,Article 34,Article 45
ECtHR - Shamsa v Poland, Application Nos 45355/99 and 45357/99, 27 November 2003
Country of applicant: Libya
Keywords: Detention

The European Court of Human Rights found that there had been a violation of Article 5(1) ECHR through the unlawful detention of two Libyan nationals by the Polish authorities after the expiration of an expulsion order due to be executed within 90 days.  

Date of decision: 27-11-2003
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Reception Conditions Directive, Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 5,Article 25,Article 26,Article 27,Article 34,Article 41,Article 43,Article 44,Article 52,Article 59,EN - Recast Reception Conditions Directive, Directive 2013/33/EU of 26 June 2013
ECtHR - Öcalan v Turkey, Application no. 46221/99, 12 March 2003
Country of applicant: Turkey

The applicant was the leader of the PKK and the most wanted person in Turkey. He was arrested and sentenced to the death penalty. Breaches of Articles 3, 5 and 6 were found with regard to his detention, the imposition of the death penalty and his rights as the defence to a fair trial.

Date of decision: 12-03-2003
Relevant International and European Legislation: ECHR (Sixth Protocol),ECHR (Thirteenth Protocol),Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 1,Article 2,Article 3,Article 5,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 10,Article 13,Article 14,Article 18,Article 27,Article 30,Article 34
ECtHR - Sen v. the Netherlands, Application no. 31465/96, 21 December 2001
Country of applicant: Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights found an infringement of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on account of the rejection of their application for a residence permit for their daughter.

Date of decision: 21-12-2001
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 8,Article 25,Article 27,Article 36,Article 41
ECtHR - Hilal v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 45276/99, 6 June 2001
Country of applicant: Tanzania

The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the proposed expulsion of a Tanzanian national from the United Kingdom to Tanzania will expose him to inhuman and degrading treatment, in violation of Article 3 of the Convention.

Date of decision: 06-06-2001
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 3,Article 6,Article 8,Article 13,Article 27,Article 31,Article 41,Article 44