Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
CJEU – Case C-181/16 Gnandi, 19 June 2018
Country of applicant: Togo

Member States can issue a return decision together with, or right after, a negative decision on an asylum application at first instance, as long as they ensure that all judicial effects of the return decision are suspended during the time allowed to appeal and pending that appeal.

During that period, and despite being subjected to a return decision, an asylum applicant must enjoy all the rights under the Reception Conditions Directive. The applicant can rely upon any changes in circumstances affecting his claim that came up after the return decision, before the appeals authority.

Date of decision: 19-06-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 39,Art 7,Art 33.1,Recital 2,Recital 8,Recital (9),Article 46,Recital (2),Recital (4),Recital (6),Recital (8),Recital (9),Recital (12),Recital (24),Article 2,Article 3,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 13,1.,Article 2,Article 3
CJEU - Case C‑47/15, Sélina Affum v Préfet du Pas-de-Calais, Procureur général de la cour d’appel de Douai
Country of applicant: Ghana
Keywords: Detention, Return
Imprisonment of a Third Country National on account of illegal entry to a Member State across an internal border of the Schengen area is not permitted under the Return Directive where said individual has not yet been subject to a return procedure.
 
This  applies equally to a Third Country National who is merely in transit on the territory of the Member State, is intercepted when leaving the Schengen area and is the subject of a procedure for readmission into the Member State from which he or she has come.
 
Date of decision: 07-06-2016
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,Recital (2),Recital (4),Recital (5),Recital (10),Recital (17),Recital (26),Article 1,Article 2,Article 3,Article 4,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 11,Article 14,Article 15,Article 16,Article 17
Hungary - Szeged District Court, 13 November 2015, 17.Ir.261/2015/5
Country of applicant: Iraq

The Iraqi Kurdish Applicant was placed in immigration detention, while waiting for the recipient statement of the Serbian authority on the basis of the readmission agreement. After the Serbian authority rejected the deportation towards Serbia, the OIN modified its decision regarding deportation towards the place of origin, to Iraq and prolonged the immigration detention of the Applicant.

The Court ruled that deportation towards Iraq cannot be carried out because of the prohibition of non-refoulement and terminated the immigration detention of the Applicant.

Date of decision: 13-11-2015
Relevant International and European Legislation: European Union Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Returns Directive, Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008,Article 5,Article 9,Article 15,1.,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3
CJEU - C-562/13, Centre public d’action sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-La-Neuve v Moussa Abdida
Country of applicant: Nigeria

The CJEU ruling concerned the scope of protection available under EU law to third country nationals suffering from serious illness whose removal would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment. The CJEU surmisedthat the removal of a person suffering a serious illness to a country where appropriate treatment was not available could in exceptional circumstances be contrary to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, and in such circumstances their removal had to be suspended pursuant to Directive 2008/115/EC on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. The Directive 2008/115/EC required the provision of emergency health care and essential treatment of illness to be made available to such persons during the period in which the Member State is required to postpone their removal.

Date of decision: 18-12-2014
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 1,Art 2,Art 3,Art 3,Article 1,Article 2,Article 3,Article 4,Article 19,Article 20,Article 21,Article 47,Article 3,Recital (2),Recital (12),Article 3,Article 5,Article 9,Article 13,Article 14,Article 3,Article 13
CJEU - C-329/11 Achughbabian Alexandre Achughbabian v Préfet du Val-de-Marne
Country of applicant: Armenia
Keywords: Detention

The case concerned whether the Returns Directive precludesnational legislation providing for the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment on a third-country national on the sole ground of their illegal entry or residence in national territory.

Date of decision: 06-12-2011
Relevant International and European Legislation: Recital (4),Recital (5),Recital (17),Article 2,Article 3,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 15