Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
Luxemburg - Administrative Tribunal, A. and B (Iraq) v. Ministry for Migration and Asylum, N° 43536, 6 November 2019
Country of applicant: Iraq

An authority examining an application for international protection by an individual already holding protection status in another Member Statemust check whether the protection of fundamental rights is systematically guaranteed by the country already providing international protection. This especially concerns applicants who are entirely dependent on public aid, and, in particular, on the public health system of the country providing them protection. 

Date of decision: 06-11-2019
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 4,Article 4,Article 3,Article 3,Article 4,Article 18,Article 30
France - Administrative tribunal of Toulouse, 9 November 2018, N° 1805185
Country of applicant: Nigeria

As a result of a transfer order to Italian authorities joined with house arrest, the applicant lodged an appeal. She argued she would be at risk of being exposed to inhuman and degrading treatments, as well as to systemic lapses of the Italian asylum system. In this case, the administrative tribunal granted annulment of those orders issued by the prefect of la Haute-Garonne in the light of the current Italian asylum conditions and the reasons motivating the applicant to reach France after having stayed in Italy. 

Date of decision: 09-11-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation: 1951 Refugee Convention,European Union Law,International Law,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,Article 47,EN - Recast Asylum Procedures Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council,Article 4,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3,EN - Dublin III Regulation, Council Regulation (EC) No. 604/2013 of 26 June 2013 (recast Dublin II Regulation),Article 3,Article 4,Article 5,Article 17,Article 20,Article 26,Article 27,Article 35,Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2010/C 83/01
Germany – Federal Administrative Court, 11 July 2018, BVerwG 1 C 18.17
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The Federal Administrative Court has to clarify whether the petition for action directed solely at the obligation to decide on the asylum application is admissible. The question if it is also possible to directly oblige the defendant to grant international protection or to establish prohibitions on deportation by means of an action is not the subject of the decision. As a result, the court comes to the conclusion that there was a delay by the respondent of providing the decision on the asylum application without sufficient reason and that the plaintiff has a need for legal protection for its action for failure to act.

Date of decision: 11-07-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 39.1,Art 4,Art 17,Recital 11,Art 2,Art 2 (e),Art 14.2,Art 13,Recital 13,Art 12.2,Article 47,Recital (18),Recital (25),Article 2,Article 4,Article 14,Article 15,Article 17,Article 31,Article 46,Article 51,Recital 10,Art 4.3,Art 12.4,Art 13.1,Art 13.2,Art 13.3,Art 17.4 (b),Art 23.2 (b),Article 4