Case summaries
C-556/17 - Torubarov, 29 July 2019
Country of applicant:
Russia
Keywords:
Assessment of facts and circumstances, Effective remedy (right to), Refugee Status, Final decision
In order to guarantee that an applicant for international protection has an effective judicial remedy within the meaning of Article 47 of the Charter, a national court or tribunal is required to vary a decision of the first-instance determining body that does not comply with its previous judgment. The court or tribunal must substitute its own decision on the application for international protection by disapplying, if necessary, the national law that prohibits it from proceeding in that way.
Date of decision:
29-07-2019
Relevant International and European Legislation:
Article 47,EN - Recast Asylum Procedures Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council,Recital (18),Recital (50),Recital (60),Article 2,Article 46,Article 51,Article 52,EN - Recast Qualification Directive, Directive 2011/95/EU of 13 December 2011,Article 1,Article 2,Article 13,Article 14,Article 15,Article 18,Article 19
CJEU – Case C 180/17, X and Y, 26 September 2018
Country of applicant:
Russia
Keywords:
Effective remedy (right to), Right to remain pending a decision (Suspensive effect), Return
The CJEU ruled on the scope of the right to an effective remedy provided for in Article 46 of the (Recast) Asylum Procedures Directive and in Article 13 of the Returns Directive.
Date of decision:
26-09-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation:
Art 33,Article 18,Article 19,Art 19.2,Article 47,Recital (12),Recital (60),Article 3,Article 46,Recital (2),Recital (4),Recital (24),Article 2,Article 3,Article 12,Article 13,Article 3,Article 13