Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
Germany – High Administrative Court Sachsen-Anhalt, 31 July 2008, 2 L 33/06
Country of applicant: Russia

There are "good reasons" within the meaning of Art 4.4 of the Qualification Directive to consider that the persecution of ethnic Chechens from Chechnya which was solely based on membership of the group will not be repeated. The standard of Art 4.4 of the Qualification Directive has now replaced the concept of "sufficient safety from persecution" as developed in German case law for refugees who had been subject to persecution before they left their country of origin. 

Date of decision: 31-07-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 4.4
Germany - High Administrative Court Nordrhein-Westfalen, 19 June 2008, 20 A 4676/06.A
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The High Administrative Court decided that a considerable likelihood of group persecution of Hindus in Afghanistan did not exist. The “density” of recorded acts of violence was too low to justify the assumption that Hindus were facing an accumulation of human rights violations or other measures within the meaning of the Qualification Directive.

Date of decision: 19-06-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 10,Art 10.1 (b),Art 4.4,Art 9.2 (f),Art 9.2 (b),Art 9.2 (c),Art 9.1 (a),Art 9.2 (d),Art 9.2 (a)
Belgium – Council for Alien Law Litigation, 7 May 2008, Nr. 10.947
Country of applicant: Rwanda

This case concerned state persecution. The CALL held that when the agents of persecution are national authorities, there is a strong presumption that protection within the country of origin is not accessible, as the authorities are able to pursue a person throughout the entire territory under their control.

Date of decision: 07-05-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 8,Art 10.1 (d),Art 4.4
Belgium - Council for Alien Law Litigation, 11 March2008, No. 8512
Country of applicant: Rwanda

Extremely serious previous persecution was sufficient to establish a well-founded fear of persecution even when it appeared unlikely to recur. 

Date of decision: 11-03-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 1A (2),Art 4.4,Art 1C (5)
Belgium – Council for Alien Law litigation, 20 December 2007, Nr. 5.277
Country of applicant: Rwanda

In its assessment of real risk of serious harm the CALL took into consideration the psychological circumstances of the applicant. The CALL considered that the seriousness of the applicant’s past traumatic experiences (as a child soldier) had left such psychological marks on him that a future forced enrolment in the army would be psychologically unbearable for him and would, in his case, amount to inhuman and degrading treatment.

Date of decision: 20-12-2007
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 15 (b),Art 4.4
Germany - Administrative Court Köln, 12 October 2007, 18 K 6334/05.A
Country of applicant: Iraq

Currently every Sunnite and Shiite from Central and South Iraq is to be considered as a refugee within the meaning of Section 60 (1) Residence Act and the 1951 Refugee Convention, if he/she originates from a region with mixed denominations.

Returnees who originate from regions of mixed denominations cannot obtain internal protection in any part of Iraq.

Date of decision: 12-10-2007
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 8,Art 4.3,Art 7,Art 9,Art 10.1 (d),Art 10,Art 4,Art 6,Art 4.4,Art 1A,UNHCR Handbook,Para 38,Para 37,Para 41,Para 42,Para 39,Para 40,Art 2 (c),Para 44,Para 43,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3,Article 4,Article 5,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 11,Article 12,Article 15
Germany - High Administrative Court Baden-Württemberg, 25 October 2006, A 3 S 46/06
Country of applicant: Russia, Russia (Chechnya)

Members of a family, who are Russian citizens of Chechen ethnicity, who originate from Chechnya, can avail of internal protection (in the context of persecution by non-state actors, Section 60 (1) sentence (4) (c) of the Residence Act in conjunction with Art 8 of the Qualification Directive) in areas outside Chechnya, if one family member (in this instance the wife) possesses a new Russian internal passport, which is an important requirement for registration.

Date of decision: 25-10-2006
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 15 (c),Art 4.4,Art 4.3 (c),Art 8.1,Art 8.2,Art 38