Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
UK - Court of Appeal, 18 November 2010, RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1285
Country of applicant: Zimbabwe

The rationale of the decision in HJ (Iran) (see separate summary in this database) applies to cases concerning political opinion. Consequently an individual cannot be expected to modify their political beliefs or deny their opinion in order to avoid persecution. The situation in Zimbabwe was exceptional. At that time, the country guidance held that those who were unable to demonstrate their loyalty to the regime were at risk of persecution. Thus, those with no political beliefs could not be required to profess their loyalty to the regime to avoid persecution and were entitled to refugee status.

Date of decision: 18-11-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1A (2),Art 10.1 (d),Art 10.1 (e),Art 10,Art 33
Germany - Administrative Court Frankfurt / Oder, 11 November 2010, VG 4 K 772/10.A
Country of applicant: Cameroon

Refugee status was granted as the applicant was deemed at risk of persecution due to his homosexuality. The court found that homosexuals constitute a particular social group in Cameroon according to Section 60 (1) of the Residence Act / Art 10.1 (d) of the Qualification Directive. According to the Qualification Directive, sexual orientation does not only constitute an unchangeable characteristic, but is so fundamental to the identity of a person that he/she should not be forced to denounce it. That means that under the Qualification Directive it is no longer important if the applicant can persevere with abstinence in the long term. The punishment which the applicant would face due to homosexual acts in case of return does not simply constitute criminal prosecution, but is persecution in terms of Section 60 (1) Residence Act.

Date of decision: 11-11-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1A (2),Art 9.2,Art 10.1 (d),Art 4,Art 9.2 (c),EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 8
Belgium – Council for Alien Law litigation, 20 October 2010, Nr. 49.821
Country of applicant: Macedonia

This case concerned the concept of “particular social group." The CALL held that persons of the same sex can, in certain societies, be considered as a “particular social group.” The applicant, a victim of forced prostitution, was granted international protection on the basis of her belonging to the social group of women.

Date of decision: 20-10-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1A (2),Art 10.1 (d),Art 4.4
UK - Supreme Court, 7 July 2010, HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31
Country of applicant: Cameroon, Iran
Homosexuals are members of a particular social group being defined by the immutable characteristic of their sexuality.
 
Asylum should not be refused to a homosexual person on the basis that it could be considered reasonably tolerable, if returned to their home country, for him or her to deny their identity and conceal their sexuality in order to avoid being persecuted.
Date of decision: 07-07-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1A (2),Art 10.1 (d),Art 33,Art 9.1 (a)
France - Council of State, 14 June 2010, OFPRA c/ M. A., n°323669
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The involvement in a State regular police force does not constitute, in itself, the expression of political opinions or the membership of a particular social group.

Date of decision: 14-06-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1A (2),Art 4.3,Art 10.1 (d),Art 10.1 (e)
Germany - Administrative Court Aachen, 10 May 2010, 2 K 562/07.A
Country of applicant: Nigeria
  1. In principle, a threat of female genital mutilation (FGM) has to be considered as political persecution according to Section 60 (1) Residence Act.
  2. In Nigeria, FGM is still widespread in all known forms. For the Edo ethnic group, it is usually performed between seven and fourteen days after birth.
  3. The number of circumcisions performed (among the Edo ethnic group) during puberty has decreased significantly in recent years and circumcisions in adulthood are no longer performed, or they are only carried out in a small number of cases.

In the present case the court found that it was unlikely that the applicant was at risk of FGM considering her age (five years) and the fact that both her parents opposed the practice. Further, the requirements of ‘Prohibition of deportation’ (Section 60 (2) through (7) of the Residence Act) were not established; it was considered unlikely that the applicant would actually return to Nigeria as her mother had residency in Germany.

Date of decision: 10-05-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 8,Art 4.2,Art 7,Art 9,Art 10.1 (d),Art 10.1 (e),Art 10,Art 4.4,Art 4.3 (c),Art 4.3 (b),EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 8
Germany - High Administrative Court Hamburg, 22 April 2010, 4 Bf 220/03.A
Country of applicant: Ivory Coast

Refugee protection was not granted, since the applicant, as a member of the particular social group of "Djoula living in the South of  Côte d’Ivoire" (Art 10.1(d) Qualification Directive) was not subject to political persecution when he left Côte d’Ivoire in 2001. The court found that group persecution was not established due to the insufficient frequency of acts of persecution against members of this group and therefore in case of return, the applicant would not face such group persecution.

Date of decision: 22-04-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 8,Art 9,Art 10.1 (d),Art 15,Art 10,Art 4.4,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 8,Article 15
Germany - Administrative Court Karlsruhe, 16 April 2010, A 10 K 523/08
Country of applicant: Iraq

Threats from terrorists against a person who has worked for the international forces in Iraq do not justify the granting of refugee status. Iraqi citizens who have cooperated with the occupying forces do not form a “social group” within the meaning of the Qualification Directive. However, the applicant is entitled to subsidiary protection since there is an armed conflict in the Nineveh region and because the threats by terrorists experienced in the past constitute individual “risk-enhancing” circumstances.

Date of decision: 16-04-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 15 (c),Art 10.1 (d)
Germany - Administratvive Court Münster, 11 K 413/09.A, 15 March 2010
Country of applicant: Nigeria

A single woman from Nigeria (Urhobo) was eligible for protection from deportation under Section 60 (7) sentence (1) of the Residence Act due to a threat of female genital mutilation (FGM) and forced marriage. The economic and social situation in Nigeria is difficult and tense even for the vast majority of the population. The situation is much worse for single women as women in Nigeria are exposed to multiple discrimination. To a large extent they are under legal incapacity, so that in practice they are only in a position to protect their own interests if they are supported by their family.

Date of decision: 15-03-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,Art 4.2,Art 10.1 (d),Art 4.3 (c),Art 4.3 (a),Art 4.3 (b)
France - CNDA, 23 December 2010, Mr. K., n°08014099
Country of applicant: Algeria

In the situation which currently prevails in Algeria, while homosexuality is in some ways tolerated by society, as long as it is not explicitly expressed by the behaviour or the clothes, individuals who openly manifest their homosexuality may nevertheless be subjected to intimidation in their social environment and by the security forces. In addition, legislation punishes homosexuals by a prison sentence and a fine.

Date of decision: 23-01-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: EN - Qualification Directive, Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004,1951 Refugee Convention,Art 1A (2),Art 2 (e),Art 10.1 (d),Art 15,Art 6