Case summaries

Germany - Administrative Court Gießen, 11 July 2013, 5 K 1316/12.GI.A
Country of applicant: Pakistan

Ahmadis, for whom the practise and possibly also the promotion of their faith in public are elements which define their identity and as such are essential, are very likely to be at risk of political persecution in Pakistan. The “relationship consideration” demanded by the Federal Administrative Court, whereby the number of members of a particular group is compared with the number of actual threatening acts of persecution, seems virtually impossible in this case.

Date of decision: 11-07-2013
Slovenia - Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, 10 July 2013, I Up 250/2013
Country of applicant: Somalia

The International Protection Act's (ZMZ) definition of family members is not inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia nor with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights  (ECHR).

The ZMZ does not give the body that decides on international protection the discretion to broaden the circle of family members in special circumstances, nor are such obligations or discretions given by EU legislation or the ECHR.

Date of decision: 10-07-2013
ECtHR - H. and B. v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 70073/10 and 44539/11
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

On the basis of the general situation in Afghanistan and the lack of cogent reasons to depart from the findings of fact of national courts, the applicants would not be at risk of treatment contrary to 3 ECHR if returned from the UK to Kabul (Afghanistan)

Date of decision: 09-07-2013
Belgium - Council of State, 5 July 2013, No. 224.276
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

General information about the country of origin indicating that returning refugees (in Kabul) often end up subjected to degrading conditions must be taken into consideration in determining the reasonableness of an internal protection alternative (IPA). If not, then the constitutional, judicial obligation to give reasons is breached. 

Date of decision: 05-07-2013
Finland - Helsinki Administrative Court, 4 July 2013, Hehao 13/0757/1
Country of applicant: Syria

The Helsinki Administrative Court considered the Applicant to be particularly vulnerable in relation to Italy due to her health condition, the traumatic experiences in Syria and the country of origin information regarding the asylum system in Italy. She would suffer from serious harm if returned there. The Helsinki Administrative Court returned the case for new processing by the Finnish Immigration Service.

Date of decision: 04-07-2013
Austria - Constitutional Court (VfGH), 29 June 2013, U1446-1448/2012
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

Even if an unaccompanied minor refugee has entered the country together with a brother (sister) of full age, Art 6 Dublin II Regulation is applicable to the former and within the meaning of the judgment of the CJEU of 06.06.2013, case C-648/11, the relevant country of the asylum application is responsible. With regard to the accompanying brother (sister) of full age, use should be made of the right to assume the examination owing to the family connection in order to avoid a violation of Art 8 ECHR.

Date of decision: 29-06-2013
UK - Court of Appeal, R (AR (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2013] EWCA Civ 778
Country of applicant: Iran

This case related to a dispute as to whether the UK or Belgium had responsibility for determining the applicant’s asylum claim

Date of decision: 28-06-2013
Hungary - Administrative and Labour Court of Budapest, 28 June 2013, R.Y (Afghanistan) v Office of Immigration and Nationality (OIN), 17.K.31893/2013/3-IV
Country of applicant: Afghanistan

The Applicant challenged the first instance decision and was granted refugee status on the basis of a fear of persecution on grounds of his imputed political opinion, which was not identified by the asylum authority (OIN). The asylum authority considered Kabul as an alternative for internal protection, which was rejected by the Court since the Applicant had no family ties and employment in Kabul, which is getting overpopulated and residents are threatened by terrorist attacks.

Date of decision: 28-06-2013
Finland - Supreme Administrative Court, 28 June 2013, KHO:2013:119
Country of applicant: Russia

A Russian Federation citizen, originally from Chechnya, had applied for international protection in Finland due to threat of persecution based on his/her family’s political activities. The Applicant had been diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder because of torture. According to the Immigration Service, he/she could resort to internal relocation as specified in Section 88e of the Aliens Act and there were no grounds for granting international protection. The Administrative Court rejected the appeal. The Supreme Administrative Court took the view that the Applicant has had close ties to the Komi Republic and had no problems with the authorities while living there. Therefore he/she can be expected to rely on internal relocation to another part of the country, as specified in Article 88e of the Aliens Act and he/she was not in need of international protection.

Date of decision: 28-06-2013
ECtHR - A.G.A.M., D.N.M., M.K.N., M.Y.H. and Others, N.A.N.S., N.M.B., N.M.Y. and Others and S.A. v. Sweden, Application Nos. 71680/10, 28379/11, 72413/10, 50859/10, 68411/10, 68335/10, 72686/10 and 66523/10
Country of applicant: Iraq

In 8 joined cases, the Applicants’ deportation to Iraq would not violate Articles 2 or 3 due to the possibility of their internal relocation away from their former homes to other regions of Iraq.

Date of decision: 27-06-2013