Case summaries

  • My search
  • Country of applicant
    1
Reset
CJEU - C-31/09 Nawras Bolbol v Hungary
Country of applicant: Palestinian Territory

For the purposes of the first sentence of Article 12(1)(a) of Directive 2004/83, a person receives protection or assistance from an agency of the United Nations other than UNHCR when that person has actually availed himself of that protection or assistance.

Article 1D of the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, to which Article 12(1)(a) of the Directive refers, merely excludes from the scope of that Convention those persons who are at present receiving protection or assistance from an organ or agency of the United Nations other than UNHCR. It follows from the clear wording of Article 1D of the Geneva Convention that only those persons who have actually availed themselves of the assistance provided by UNRWA come within the clause excluding refugee status set out therein, which must, as such, be construed narrowly and cannot therefore also cover persons who are or have been eligible to receive protection or assistance from that agency.

Date of decision: 17-06-2010
Belgium – Council for Alien Law Litigation, 29 January 2010, Nr. 37.912
Country of applicant: Palestinian Territory

The CALL ruled that when a Palestinian refugee, who is under the care of United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNWRA), resides outside the mandate areas of UNWRA, then this person no longer benefits from the protection of UNWRA and therefore falls under Art 1D(2) of the 1951 Refugee Convention, meaning that this person has an automatic right to the protection of the Convention. It should however be examined whether the person can return to the mandate areas and place him/herself back under the protection of UNWRA.

Date of decision: 29-01-2010
UK - Court of Appeal , 9 August 2008, MA (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 304
Country of applicant: Palestinian Territory
It is not in principle persecution to deny a stateless person re-entry to their country of formal habitual residence. However, it may be persecution for a state to arbitrarily exclude one of its nationals.
Date of decision: 09-08-2008
UK - Court of Appeal, 26 July 2002, El-Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1103
Country of applicant: Lebanon, Palestinian Territory
Art 1D of the 1951 Refugee Convention only applies to Palestinians who met two criteria. First of all, they had to have been in receipt of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East (“UNRWA”) protection or assistance on or before 28 July 1951 which was the date that the Convention was adopted. Secondly, whilst UNRWA’s mandate continued, if such Palestinians had left UNRWA’s field of operation they would have to show that they were in “exceptional circumstance”; for example if they were prevented from returning to UNRWA’s field of operation.
Date of decision: 26-07-2002
Poland - Supreme Administrative Court in Warsaw, 14 February 2002, V SA/Wa 1673/01,
Country of applicant: Palestinian Territory

One cannot demand recognition of refugee status pursuant to Article 1A(2) of the Geneva Convention where protection can be provided pursuant to Article 1D of the Convention. The phrase used in the first sentence of Article 1D of the Convention – “persons who are at present receiving… protection or assistance” – relates to those Palestinians who could avail themselves of protection on the date of the Convention, i.e., on 28 July 1951., and to their direct descendants born after that date, provided they remain under the mandate of UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency). “Protection or assistance” for Palestinians is provided solely in areas under the UNRWA mandate. Therefore, exclusions from protection under the Geneva Convention relate only to those Palestinians who reside permanently in those areas.

Date of decision: 14-02-2002