Case summaries

  • My search
  • Country of applicant
    1
Reset
Sweden - Migration Court, 1 March 2011, UM 20938-10
Country of applicant: China

This case concerned a Chinese applicant of Uyghur ethnicity who was granted residence and refugee status because of his sur place political activities in Sweden.

Date of decision: 01-03-2011
Ireland - High Court, 28 April 2010, M.Y.G. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform & Anor, [2010] IEHC 127
Country of applicant: China

This case concerned fair procedures, namely the right of an applicant to an oral hearing of his asylum appeal. The Court held that a fair appeal does not necessarily impute a right to be heard orally.

Date of decision: 28-04-2010
Ireland - High Court, 10 February 2010, X.L.C. v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform and Anor., [2010] IEHC 148
Country of applicant: China

This case concerned a decision of the Office of the Refugee Applications Commissioner (ORAC) to refuse to recommend refugee status on grounds of credibility. The refusal contained a finding which allowed an appeal on the papers only. The applicant sought to have this decision set aside by the High Court on the basis that an appeal without an oral hearing was insufficient as the report depended on a finding of a lack of credibility and thus required oral testimony to rebut this.

Date of decision: 10-02-2010
Germany - Federal Administrative Court, 5 March 2009, 10 C 51.07
Country of applicant: China

This case concerned the assessment of religious persecution. The court found that:

  1. Even under the Qualification Directive not every restriction of religious freedom results in persecution within the meaning of asylum law. Whether a measure is tied to religion as a reason for persecution is found within Art 10 of the Qualification Directive; but what right is protected, and to what extent, proceeds from Art 9 of the Qualification Directive.
  2. Interference in a core area of religious freedom represents a severe violation of a basic human right within the meaning of Art 9.1 of the Qualification Directive. Whether, and under what conditions, religious activity in public is also included, is a matter of uncertainty under Community law that must ultimately be clarified by the European Court of Justice.
Date of decision: 05-03-2009
Slovakia - Migration Office, 16 October 2007, L.L. v Ministry of the Interior of the Slovak Republic, 1 Sža/9/2007
Country of applicant: China

Within the meaning of Section 8 of the Asylum Act, a particular social group is a group of people who share a common characteristic which is objectively given or is perceived as such by society. The characteristic in question usually has an innate, unchangeable form or is otherwise fundamental to human identity, conscience or the exercise of the human rights of the persons affected. 

It therefore usually comprises a group of people of similar social origin or status, social habits and customs, or of a similar sexual orientation, who are in a minority due to their otherness.

Date of decision: 16-10-2007