Case summaries

  • My search
  • Country of applicant
    1
Reset
UK - The Queen on the application of Mr Mohsen Pourali Tabrizagh, Mr Tahir Syed, Mr Saeed Ali, Mr Ali Omar Mohammed, Mr Edmond Karaj, AB (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Country of applicant: Albania, Iran, Pakistan, Sudan

The case considered an application against the decision of the Secretary of State denying the Claimants a right of in-country appeal against the removal of the Claimants to Italy under the Dublin Regulation. The Claimants argued that their removal to Italy would expose them to a real risk of a breach of their rights under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The court found that there was no evidence to rebut the presumption that Italy would comply with its obligations under EU laws or of special vulnerability in the personal circumstances of any of the Claimants, to support the assertion that Article 3 of the ECHR would be breached by the Claimants’ removal to Italy. 

Date of decision: 11-06-2014
Italy - Court of Turin, 3 February 2013, RG 797/2013
Country of applicant: Albania

The legality of an applicant’s detention in a Centre for Identification and Expulsion (C.I.E.), even where this satisfies legal requirements, should be assessed in the light of the compatibility of the applicant’s state of health with the type of assistance and support that the centre is able to provide.

Date of decision: 03-02-2013
Ireland - High Court, 1 December 2010, Gashi v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, [2010] IEHC 436
Country of applicant: Albania, Kosovo

This case concerns a revocation decision, which turned on the meaning of Art 14.3(b) of the Qualification Directive (in particular the word “decisive” in that Article). The Court relied on an analysis of the French and Italian translations of Art 14.3, which the court felt were not worded as precisely as the English text.

Date of decision: 01-12-2010
UK - Upper Tribunal, AM and BM (Trafficked women) Albania CG [2010] UKUT 80 (IAC)
Country of applicant: Albania

The appellants argued that they were at risk of re-trafficking and would not find protection anywhere in Albania. The tribunal agreed, and laid down country guidance on the risks facing trafficked women and the absence of effective protection from these risks.

Date of decision: 18-02-2010
Sweden - Migration Court of Appeal, 21 November 2008, UM 1042-08
Country of applicant: Albania

Internal protection is considered available for women suffering domestic abuse and violence in Albania. 

Date of decision: 21-11-2008
Belgium - Council for Alien Law Litigation, 6 November 2008, Nr. 18.419
Country of applicant: Albania

This case considered whether or not a “family” could constitute a particular social group under the Refugee Convention. The applicant, whose family was implicated in a vendetta, had a well-founded fear of persecution on the basis of her membership of the social group that is her family. It was held by the CALL that a family could constitute a particular social group. 

Date of decision: 06-11-2008
UK - Immigration Appeal Tribunal, 19 July 2001, Kacaj v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKIAT 0018
Country of applicant: Albania
This case confirmed that the UK will apply a single standard of proof for protection claims, whether based on Refugee Convention grounds or Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Date of decision: 19-07-2001