Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
ECtHR – Musaev v. Turkey, Application No. 72754/11
Country of applicant: Uzbekistan

The European Court of Human Rights has held Turkey to be in violation of the applicant’s right to liberty as well as material reception conditions during his detention in Kumkapı Removal Centre. The Court further held that the applicant had not benefited from an effective remedy by which to complain of the detention conditions.

Date of decision: 21-10-2014
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 3,Article 13,Art 5.1,Art 5.2,Art 5.4,Art 5.5
ECtHR – Dbouba v. Turkey, Application No. 15916/09, 13 October 2010
Country of applicant: Tunisia
The applicant, a Tunisian national who has been recognised as a refugee by the UNHCR, faced deportation by Turkey to Tunisia, where he risks ill-treatment and the death penalty. He has not had access to an effective remedy with regards to this, nor has he been allowed to challenge the lawfulness of his detention. By virtue of the applicant’s proposed return to Tunisia the Court found a violation of Article 3 ECHR in conjunction with Article 13. The Court also found a violation of articles 5(1), 5(2), 5(4) and 5(5) ECHR.
 
Date of decision: 13-10-2010
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 3,Article 5,Article 13,Article 35,Article 41,Article 44,Art 5.1,Art 5.2,Art 5.4,Art 5.5
ECtHR - Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, (no. 30471/08), 22 September 2009
Country of applicant: Iran

The applicants, who had been recognised as refugees by UNHCR, faced risk of ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 upon Turkey’s proposed  deportation of them to either Iran or Iraq. They had no effective opportunity to make an asylum claim or challenge their deportation. Further their detention had no legal justification and they had been unable to challenge its lawfulness. The Court found violations of Article 3, 13, 5(1), 5(2) and 5(4). 

Date of decision: 22-09-2009
Relevant International and European Legislation: 1951 Refugee Convention,Council of Europe Instruments,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 3,Article 5,Article 13,Art 5.1,Art 5.2,Art 5.4
ECtHR - Saadi v. United Kingdom, no. 13229/03, 29 January 2008
Country of applicant: Iraq

The seven day detention of a ‘temporarily admitted’ asylum seeker under the fast-track procedure was non-arbitrary and consistent with Article 5(1), but the 76 hour delay in providing the individual with the real reasons for his detention did not satisfy the promptness requirement of Article 5(2).

Date of decision: 29-01-2008
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 18,Art 1,Art 33,Art 7,Art 31,Article 18,Art 5.1,Art 5.2
ECtHR - Čonka v Belgium, Application no. 51564/99, 5 February 2002
Country of applicant: Slovakia

The applicants were unlawfully detained and had no effective remedy to challenge their detention. There was a finding that they had been collectively expelled, given the context of their expulsion along with many others of the same nationality, and as their individual circumstances had not been adequately taken into consideration. 

Date of decision: 05-02-2002
Relevant International and European Legislation: 1951 Refugee Convention,EN - Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,Article 5,Article 13,Art 5.1,Art 5.2,Art 5.4,ECHR (Fourth Protocol),Art 4