Italy - Court of Cassation in Rome, 02 July 2010, No. RG 17576/2010
Keywords:
| Keywords |
|
Assessment of facts and circumstances
{ return; } );"
>
Description
The duty of the state to carry out an individual assessment of all relevant elements of the asylum application according to the provisions of Article 4 of the Qualification Directive, including considering past persecution and credibility; and the duty of the applicant to submit as soon as possible all statements and documentation necessary to substantiate the application. |
|
Burden of proof
{ return; } );"
>
Description
"In the migration context, a non-national seeking entry into a foreign State must prove that he or she is entitled to enter and is not inadmissible under the laws of that State. In refugee status procedures, where an applicant must establish his or her case, i.e. show on the evidence that he or she has well-founded fear of persecution. Note: A broader definition may be found in the Oxford Dictionary of Law." |
|
Persecution (acts of)
{ return; } );"
>
Description
"Human rights abuses or other serious harm, often, but not always, with a systematic or repetitive element. Per Article 9 of the Qualification Directive, acts of persecution for the purposes of refugee status must: (a) be acts sufficiently serious by their nature or repetition as to constitute a severe violation of basic human rights, in particular the rights from which derogation cannot be made under Article 15(2) of the ECHR; or (b) be an accumulation of various measures, including violations of human rights which is sufficiently severe as to affect an individual in a similar manner as mentioned in (a). This may, inter alia, take the form of: acts of physical or mental violence, including acts of sexual violence; legal, administrative, police and/or judicial measures which are in themselves discriminatory or which are implemented in a discriminatory manner; prosecution or punishment, which is disproportionate or discriminatory; denial of judicial redress resulting in a disproportionate or discriminatory punishment; prosecution or punishment for refusal to perform military service in a conflict, where performing military service would include crimes or acts falling under the exclusion clauses in Article 12(2). " |
|
Political Opinion
{ return; } );"
>
Description
One of the grounds of persecution specified in the refugee definition per Article 1A ofthe1951 Refugee Convention. According to the Qualification Directive the concept of political opinion includes holding an opinion, thought or belief on a matter related to potential actors of persecution and to their policies or methods, whether or not that opinion, thought or belief has been acted upon by the applicant. |
Headnote:
Political persecution can also exist when legally adopted criminal sanctions are imposed following standard legal proceedings against someone who has simply expressed political opinions. On the other hand, repressive measures with criminal sanctions against incitement to violence cannot be considered to be persecution.
Facts:
In January 2008, a Turkish citizen submitted an application for international protection to the Territorial Commission in Rome stating that he had been subjected to persecution in his own country as a member of a political movement of Kurdish ethnicity (the D.P.T.). The request was rejected by the Territorial Commission, which stated that the conditions for recognition had not been met. An appeal was lodged against this decision to the next two instances.
Decision & reasoning:
The Court of Cassation held that the decision of the Appeals Court (court of second instance) was unlawful, as that Court had rejected the appeal without carrying out its obligations of investigation and gathering complete documentation concerning the actual situation in the country of origin.
Indeed, according to the Court of Cassation, the Court should have investigated the facts described by the Applicant – that he had been convicted of terrorism – in order to be able to assess whether there had been persecution. The Court of Cassation stated that the European Court of Human Rights had established that political persecution can also exist when legally adopted criminal sanctions are imposed following standard legal proceedings against someone who has simply expressed political opinions. On the other hand, repressive measures with criminal sanctions against incitement to violence cannot be considered to be persecution. No proper investigation had been carried out regarding the actual circumstances and the Court of Cassation held that this was vital.
Outcome:
The decision of the Judge of second instance was declared unlawful and the case was sent back to the second instance for a new investigation.
Relevant International and European Legislation:
Cited Cases:
| Cited Cases |
| ECtHR - Bingol v Turkey, Application No. 36141/04 |