Italy - Court of Turin, 3 February 2013, RG 797/2013
Keywords:
| Keywords |
|
Detention
{ return; } );"
>
Description
"Restriction on freedom of movement through confinement that is ordered by an administrative or judicial authority(ies) in order that another procedure may be implemented. In an EU asylum context, this means confinement of an asylum seeker by a Member State within a particular place, where the applicant is deprived of his or her freedom of movement. This may occur during any stage of or throughout the asylum process, from the time an initial application is made up to the point of removal of an unsuccessful asylum seeker. In an EU Return context, Member States may only detain or keep in a detention facility a third-country national who is the subject of return procedures in order to prepare the return and/or carry out the removal process, in particular when: (a) there is a risk of absconding; or (b) the third-country national concerned avoids or hampers the preparation of return or the removal process. Any detention shall be for as short a period as possible and only maintained as long as removal arrangements are in progress and executed with due diligence." |
|
Reception conditions
{ return; } );"
>
Description
The full set of measures that Member States grant to asylum seekers in accordance with Directive 2003/9/EC. |
|
Health (right to)
{ return; } );"
>
Description
Member States shall ensure that applicants receive the necessary health care which shall include, at least, emergency care and essential treatment of illness. Member States shall also ensure that beneficiaries of refugee or subsidiary protection status have access to health care under the same eligibility conditions as nationals of the Member State that has granted such statuses. |
Headnote:
The legality of an applicant’s detention in a Centre for Identification and Expulsion (C.I.E.), even where this satisfies legal requirements, should be assessed in the light of the compatibility of the applicant’s state of health with the type of assistance and support that the centre is able to provide.
Facts:
The applicant, an Albanian citizen who had been living illegally in the country, had been held at C.I.E. Brunelleschi in Turin following an injunction issued by the Police Commissioner and validated by the Justice of the Peace.
In addition, the applicant had submitted a request for international protection that had been heard by the Commission responsible for the area and was awaiting the Commission’s decision.
The Court of Turin was asked to decide on the lawfulness of an extension to the detention for another 30 days. In light of the delicate state of health of the applicant, the judge considered it appropriate to carry out a thorough investigation into whether the applicant’s state of health was compatible with the type of assistance and support that the detention centre was able to provide.
Decision & reasoning:
The Court decided not to extend the detention for another 30 days but only for 7 days and asked the doctor at the C.I.E. to examine the applicant’s medical records and to assess whether the applicant’s state of health was compatible with the type of assistance and support that the centre was able to provide.
This complied with the request of the applicant’s defence which argued that the detention was contrary to Article 3 of ECHR.
Outcome:
Applicant’s appeal partly upheld; detention extended only for 7 days pending further assessments.
Relevant International and European Legislation:
Cited National Legislation:
| Cited National Legislation |
| Italy - D.lgs 25/2008 “Casi di trattenimento” (Legislative Decree 'Cases of Detention') - Art 21(2) |