Greece - Patras Court for Misdemeanors, Decision of 13 October 2017

Greece - Patras Court for Misdemeanors, Decision of 13 October 2017
Country of Decision: Greece
Country of applicant: Turkey
Court name: Patras Court for Misdemeanors
Date of decision: 13-10-2017

Keywords:

Keywords
Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Persecution Grounds/Reasons
Relevant Documentation
Residence document

Headnote:

The use of forged documents by asylum seekers, when attempting to flee from one country and seek protection under international law in another country, is not criminally liable, when it is the result of a well-founded fear for inhuman or degrading treatment.

Facts:

The three defendants, of Kurdish origin and residents in Turkey, were seized by the Greek police on 2/10/2017, while attempting to leave Greek territory from the southern port of Patras, in order to travel to Italy and further on to Germany, where they would seek asylum. They had decided to leave Turkey beause they had been targeted, prosecuted and unfairly convicted there for their legitimate political actions and beliefs. The also feared the degrading and inhuman conditions prevailing in Turkish prisons for Kurds and for people sharing similar political views. Due to their conviction, as well as the arrest warrants that were pending against them, they could not obtain legal travel documents and therefore attempted to leave Greece with fake documents.

When they were arrested in Greece, they were accused of illegally leaving the country and of possessing and using forged passports.

Decision & reasoning:

In the majority's opinion, the defendants’ asylum claim is well-founded, as they are foreigners in Greece, and have a well-founded fear of being persecuted by the Turkish authorities due to their political beliefs and Kurdish origin.

Regarding the charges of the crimes related to the illegal exit from the country and the possession and use of forged documents, the court held that the defendants did commit these crimes but due to the emergency of their situation they could not be held criminally liable.

The court specifically ruled that there was a danger to the applicants’ life and physical integrity. These legitimate values outweigh Greece’s public order prerogative, as well as the need to ensure that legal instruments are not tampered with. Therefore, the defendants are dismissed because of the element of a situation of emergency. In addition, the conditions of Article 31 (1) of the 1951 Geneva Convention are met, as a reason for exemption from the scope of application of the above crimes.

Outcome:

Defendants were cleared of all charges.

Observations/comments:

The summary was completed by Danai Spentzou, LLM Student at Queen Mary University of London.

Relevant International and European Legislation:

Cited National Legislation:

Cited National Legislation
51
12
16
17
32
27
25
14
57
79
53
Article 28(1) (a) Greek Constitution
Articles 2(1)
83(1) (a) Law 3386/2005
Article 2(1)
29(7) law 4251/2014
Articles 1
18 (b)
26 (1) (a)
80
94 Greek Criminal Code

Other sources:

The Court further referred to domestic jurisprudence, including case 470/2011 of the Greek Civil and Criminal Supreme Court (Areios Pagos), 47/2006 Aegean Appeals Court and 2012/2004 Three Member Criminal Court of Corfu.