Austria – Federal Administrative Court 30 December 2016, W237 2104471-1
Keywords:
| Keywords |
|
Country of origin information
{ return; } );"
>
Description
"Information used by the Member States authorities to analyse the socio-political situation in countries of origin of applicants for international protection (and, where necessary, in countries through which they have transited) in the assessment, carried out on an individual basis, of an application for international protection.” It includes all relevant facts as they relate to the country of origin at the time of taking a decision on the application, obtained from various sources, including the laws and regulations of the country of origin and the manner in which they are applied, regulations of the country of origin, plus general public sources, such as reports from (inter)national organisations, governmental and non-governmental organisations, media, bi-lateral contacts in countries of origin, embassy reports, etc. This information is also used inter alia for taking decisions on other migration issues, e.g. on return, as well as by researchers. One of the stated aims of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) is to progressively bring all activities related to practical cooperation on asylum under its roof, to include the collection of Country of Origin Information and a common approach to its use. |
|
Individual assessment
{ return; } );"
>
Description
The carrying out of an assessment on an individual and personal basis. In relation to applications for international protection, per Article 4(3) of the Qualification Directive, this includes taking into account: (a) all relevant facts as they relate to the country of origin at the time of taking a decision; (b) the relevant statements and documentation presented by the applicant; “(c) the individual position and personal circumstances of the applicant, including factors such as background, gender and age, so as to assess whether, on the basis of the applicant's personal circumstances, the acts to which the applicant has been or could be exposed would amount to persecution or serious harm; (d) whether the applicant's activities since leaving the country of origin were engaged in for the sole or main purpose of creating the necessary conditions for applying for international protection, so as to assess whether these activities will expose the applicant to persecution or serious harm if returned to that country; (e) whether the applicant could reasonably be expected to avail himself of the protection of another country where he could assert citizenship.” |
|
Medical Reports/Medico-legal Reports
{ return; } );"
>
Description
“Expert medical report used as evidence relevant to the application for international protection. Where psychological elements are relevant, the medical report should provide information on the nature and degree of mental illness and should assess the applicant's ability to fulfil the requirements normally expected of an applicant in presenting his case. The conclusions of the medical report will determine the examiner's further approach.” |
|
Personal circumstances of applicant
{ return; } );"
>
Description
The range of factors such as background, gender, age, and individual position which must to be taken into account in the assessment of an application for international protection per Article 4(3)(c) of the Qualification Directive. |
|
Subsidiary Protection
{ return; } );"
>
Description
The protection given to a third-country national or a stateless person who does not qualify as a refugee but in respect of whom substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned, if returned to his or her country of origin, or in the case of a stateless person, to his or her country of former habitual residence, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm as defined in Article 15 of 2004/83/EC, and to whom Article 17(1) and (2) of 2004/83/EC do not apply, and is unable, or, owing to such risk, unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country.” “Note: The UK has opted into the Qualification Directive (2004/83/EC) but does not (legally) use the term Subsidiary Protection. It is believed that the inclusion of Humanitarian Protection within the UK Immigration rules fully transposes the Subsidiary Protection provisions of the Qualification Directive into UK law. |
|
Health (right to)
{ return; } );"
>
Description
Member States shall ensure that applicants receive the necessary health care which shall include, at least, emergency care and essential treatment of illness. Member States shall also ensure that beneficiaries of refugee or subsidiary protection status have access to health care under the same eligibility conditions as nationals of the Member State that has granted such statuses. |
|
Vulnerable person
{ return; } );"
>
Description
Persons in a vulnerable position, such as"Minors, unaccompanied minors, disabled people, elderly people, pregnant women, single parents with minor children and persons who have been subjected to torture, rape or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence. Note: Directive 2011/36/EU defines a position of vulnerability as a situation in which the person concerned has no real or acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse involved." |
Headnote:
In some cases of severe illness Art. 3 ECHR precludes a deportation even though a treatment in the state of origin is possible. If the appellant cannot bear the costs of the treatment or the necessary concomitant medication the renewed increase of the illness and therefore a real life-threatening risk is probable which precludes the deportation of the applicant.
Facts:
The applicant is of Georgian nationality and suffers from cirrhotic kidneys at a terminal stage. He is therefore a dialysis patient and already underwent treatment in Georgia for three months before coming to Austria. He has not tolerated the treatment in Georgia very well. In addition to that he had to pay the costs for the concomitant medication himself. Considering the very low welfare assistance of 55 Euro, he was not able to pay these costs amounting to a three-digit number. Also, he has no viable social network in Georgia and is incapacitated for work so that there is no other financial support. Although a transplantation is medically indicated there is no possibility for the applicant to get a kidney transplant. In Georgia organ transplantations of organs of dead people are prohibited. A transplantation of organs of living relatives is impossible since the applicants only relatives, his grandmother and his aunt who has cancer, are not eligible.
Since the costs of medication are taken by the health insurance in Austria and since there was a prospect of being placed on a transplant patient list as soon as getting a residence permit, the applicant illegally entered Austria on 2 March 2014 and requested subsidiary protection. Since then he lived in Austria with his wife of Russian nationality and their two children who were born in Austria. Furthermore, he underwent treatment at an Austrian hospital. The Austrian Asylum authorities denied the application for asylum, subsidiary protection and a residence permit based on other legitimate factors. Moreover, they issued a decision of removal and stated that a deportation may take place. The authorities based their decision on the fact that a treatment in Georgia was possible. The quality of that treatment is irrelevant. The applicant lodged an appeal before the Federal Administrative Court which reached the court on 23 March 2015.
The applicant criticised the insufficient analysis of his medical condition, his connections in Austria and the situation in Georgia. During the trial the applicant therefore submitted inter alia tables showing the medication needed, medical reports of clinics in Austria and Georgia, documents showing the welfare support he receives in Georgia and a statement of costs of the concomitant medication.
Decision & reasoning:
In its decision the Court enlarges upon the settled case law relating to Art. 3 ECHR which precludes a deportation to the country of origin if there exists an existential threat for the applicant, due to the lack of treatment of a severe illness. Even though an applicant cannot stay in a country for undergoing a treatment if a treatment in the country of origin is possible, there are special situations in which a deportation constitutes a violation against Art. 3 ECHR. Such a situation is given, when there is a real risk for the ill person of suffering a painful death in case of deportation. For the examination of the case the Court used several reports of the European Commission, GeoStat, ÖEZ, the Georgian Association of Transplantologists, the SSA, the WHO, the UNHCR, the UNFPA and other institutions and experts.
The illness of the applicant as such does not constitute a violation of Art. 3 ECHR because there are possibilities for treatment in Georgia, which he even used before coming to Austria. Also, the different quality and sanitary standards are irrelevant.
However, the Supreme Administrative Court of Austria stated in several decisions that the probability of the increase of the illness and its effects on the medical condition as well as the real risk that is resulting therefrom must be considered as well. In this context the access to treatment, especially regarding the costs of medication, must be taken into account. Therefore, the individual financial situation, the geographical distance to the location which offers treatment and the social and familiar network must be examined.
There is no possibility for the applicant to undergo a transplantation in Georgia and he, therefore, would still need to undergo dialysis treatment. This treatment is possible, but the applicant does not have the financial resources to bear the costs of the concomitant medication needed. The lack of taking this medication probably resulted in the applicant’s bad state of health because of which he went to Austria.
Due to his incapacity to work and the lack of a social or family network in Georgia the applicant can only rely on the welfare support of 55 Euros which cannot cover the expenses. Furthermore, his wife would not be able to work either because she must care for the children, which is not possible for the applicant due to the time-consuming dialysis treatment. In addition to that, his wife being of Russian nationality does not speak Georgian and would need a work permit. And even if she could work, the salary she would get as a hairdresser would not be enough to pay for all the costs.
In conclusion, the applicant would not be able to bear the costs for the concomitant medication needed during his dialysis treatment which is necessary considering the situation in Georgia prohibiting him from getting a transplantation. Without taking the medication there would be a real life-threatening risk for the applicant resulting from the increase of his illness and the bad state of health caused by it. Therefore, a deportation would violate Art. 3 ECHR.
Outcome:
Appeal granted; the applicant is entitled to subsidiary protection; the applicant receives a residence permit for one year
Observations/comments:
This case summary was written by Michael Spath.
Relevant International and European Legislation:
Cited National Legislation:
Cited Cases:
| Cited Cases |
| ECtHR - N v United Kingdom (Application no. 26565/05) |
| CJEU - C-465/07 Meki Elgafaji, Noor Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie |
| ECtHR- Fazlul Karim v. Sweden, Application no. 24171/05 |
| ECtHR - Goncharova and Alekseytsev v. Sweden (dec.), no 31246/06 |
| ECtHR - Paposhvili v. Belgium, Application no. 41738/10,13 December 2016 |
Other sources:
EC - European Commission (25 March 2015): Implementation Of The European Neighbourhood Policy In Georgia Progress In 2014 And Recommendations For Actions Accompanying The Document Joint Communication To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions
http://www.ecoi.net/file_upload/1226_1427816142_georgia-enp-report-2015-en.pdf, 17 November 2015
GeoStat - National Statistics Office of Georgia (o.D.A): Living Conditions: Relative Poverty, Registered Poverty,
http://www.geostat.ge/index.php?action=page&p_id=188&lang=eng, Zugriff 17 November 2015
GeoStat - National Statistics Office of Georgia (o.D.B): Employment and Unemployment, http://www.geostat.ge/index.php?action=page&p_id=146&lang=eng, access 17 November 2015
ÖEZ - Österreichische Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (o.D.): Georgien, http://www.entwicklung.at/laender-undregionen/schwarzmeerraumsuedkaukasus/georgien/
IOM - International Organisation for Migration (06.2014): Länderinformationsblatt Georgien
PD - Public Defender of Georgia (2013): Annual Report of the Public Defender of Georgia, the Situation of Human Rights and Freedoms in Georgia - 2013,
http://www.ombudsman.ge/uploads/other/1/1934.pdf, 17.11.2015
SSA - Social Service Agency (o.D.a.): Pecuniary Social Assistance (Subsistence Allowance), http://ssa.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=35, access 17 November 2015
SSA - Social Service Agency (o.D.a.): Reimbursement of leave for maternity and childcare, as well as for adoption of a new-born child
http://ssa.gov.ge/index.php?lang_id=ENG&sec_id=375, access 17 November2015
CoE/ECSR - Council of Europe/ European Committee of Social Rights (26.12.2014): 8th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by the Government of Georgia [RAP/RCha/GEO/8(2015)], 26 December 2014
http://www.ecoi.net/file_upload/1226_1422965667_georgia8-en.pdf, access 17 November 2015
IBZ - Federal Public Service Home Affairs General Directorate Aliens' Office Belgium, Direction Access and Stay, Humanitarian Regularisations, Medical Section, via MedCOI (27 June 2014): Country Fact Sheet Access to Healthcare: GEORGIA, access 17 November 2015
WHO - World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe (30.9.2013): This is hepatitis. ... Know it. Confront it, Georgia,
EC - European Commission (29 October 2014): Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. First Progress Report on the implementation by Georgia of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation [COM(2014) 681 final],
EC - European Commission (8 May 2015): Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. First Progress Report on the implementation by Georgia of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation [COM(2015) 199 final],
MPC - Migration Policy Centre (06.2013): Migration Profile Georgia. The Demographic-Economic Framework of Migration. The Legal Framework of Migration. The Socio-Political Framework of Migration,
Liaison officer (VB) of the Federal Ministry for Interior (BM.I) (3 February 2014): Information by the VB per Email
Information per E-Mail by the UNHCR Regional Office in the South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia), 24 February 2016
United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA), Population Situation Analysis (PSA), 2014
http://iset-pi.ge/images/Social_Policy/PSA_FinalReport.pdf
Schweizer Flüchtlingshilfe (25 February 2016): Schnellrecherche zu Georgien: Dialyse-Behandlung - Zugang und Qualität, mwN
Letter of the Georgian Association of Transplantologists, XXXX (25 February 2016)