<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/news</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/news" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[News]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>News published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:33:35+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Refusal of access to the labour market due to delays in the asylum procedure may be attributed to the applicant only for the period of time that is linked to their share of responsibility  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-refusal-of-access-to-the-labour-market-due-to-delays-in-the-asylum-procedure-may-be-attributed-to-the-applicant-only-for-the-period-of-time-that-is-linked-to-their-share-of-responsibility" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-refusal-of-access-to-the-labour-market-due-to-delays-in-the-asylum-procedure-may-be-attributed-to-the-applicant-only-for-the-period-of-time-that-is-linked-to-their-share-of-responsibility</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 15 January 2026, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled in case C-742/24 [Havvitt] concerning the reasons to refuse access to labour market for an applicant for international protection. The case concerned an asylum applicant’s delay in submitting t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:33:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Clarification on the calculation of time limits under Article 29 DRIII where a judicial body decides on the legality of a second transfer decision ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-clarification-on-the-calculation-of-time-limits-under-article-29-driii-where-a-judicial-body-decides-on-the-legality-of-a-second-transfer-decision" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-clarification-on-the-calculation-of-time-limits-under-article-29-driii-where-a-judicial-body-decides-on-the-legality-of-a-second-transfer-decision</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 December, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) published its judgment in the case C-560/23 Tang regarding a preliminary question submitted by the Danish Refugee Board (Copenhagen) on the interpretation of the time limits for carrying out a Dub...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:32:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Danish public housing legislation may constitute direct and indirect discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-danish-public-housing-legislation-may-constitute-direct-and-indirect-discrimination-on-the-basis-of-ethnic-origin" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-danish-public-housing-legislation-may-constitute-direct-and-indirect-discrimination-on-the-basis-of-ethnic-origin</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 December 2025, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) delivered its judgment in case C-417/23 (Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab, Afdeling Schackenborgvænge).   The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:32:26+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Refusal of transfer to a different reception centre cannot justify withdrawal of all material reception conditions ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-refusal-of-transfer-to-a-different-reception-centre-cannot-justify-withdrawal-of-all-material-reception-conditions" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-refusal-of-transfer-to-a-different-reception-centre-cannot-justify-withdrawal-of-all-material-reception-conditions</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 December the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C‑184/24 (Sidi Bouzid). The case concerns AF and his minor child BF, applicants for international protection in Milan, who challenge the withdrawal of the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:31:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Two communicated cases on the removal of Syrian nationals from Türkiye]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-on-the-removal-of-syrian-nationals-from-turkiye" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-on-the-removal-of-syrian-nationals-from-turkiye</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 19 January 2026, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (the “Court”) published the communicated case of  K.A. v. Türkiye (Application no. 13754/25) and the case of  A.H. v. Türkiye (Application no. 20237/25). The case of K.A. con...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:31:15+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case regarding the removal from Türkiye to Iran ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-regarding-the-removal-from-turkiye-to-iran" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-regarding-the-removal-from-turkiye-to-iran</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 19 January 2026, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (the “Court”) published the communicated case of H.K.T. and I.T. v. Türkiye (Application no. 36370/21). The case concerns an Iranian couple who claim a risk of persecution in...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:30:49+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
