<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/news</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/news" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[News]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>News published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:17:08+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Residence requirement for social assistance and employment support constitutes indirect discrimination against beneficiaries of international protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-residence-requirement-for-social-assistance-and-employment-support-constitutes-indirect-discrimination-against-beneficiaries-of-international-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-residence-requirement-for-social-assistance-and-employment-support-constitutes-indirect-discrimination-against-beneficiaries-of-international-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 7 May 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-747/22 (KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)), following a request for a preliminary ruling from the District Court, Bergamo, Italy (...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:17:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Compatibility of indefinite entry bans with EU law under Directive 2008/115 in the context of national security ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-compatibility-of-indefinite-entry-bans-with-eu-law-under-directive-2008115-in-the-context-of-national-security" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-compatibility-of-indefinite-entry-bans-with-eu-law-under-directive-2008115-in-the-context-of-national-security</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 23 April 2026 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-446/24 (Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT) originating from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Higher Administrative Court, Land of Bremen, Germany...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:16:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Two communicated cases concerning the removal of Afghan nationals from Sweden]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-concerning-the-removal-of-afghan-nationals-from-sweden" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-concerning-the-removal-of-afghan-nationals-from-sweden</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 27 April, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published the communicated cases of S.H. v. Sweden (Application no. 38099/25) and A.G. v. Sweden (Application no. 38572/25), concerning the removal of Afghan nationals from...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:16:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Inadequate detention conditions and unlawful detention in Türkiye violate Articles 3 and 5 § 1 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-inadequate-detention-conditions-and-unlawful-detention-in-turkiye-violate-articles-3-and-5-1-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-inadequate-detention-conditions-and-unlawful-detention-in-turkiye-violate-articles-3-and-5-1-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5 May 2026 the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in Z.A. and K.S. v. Türkiye (Applications nos. 36449/17). The two applicants, nationals from Kyrgyzstan and Russia, entered Türkiye and subsequently...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:15:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Excessive use of force and lack of effective judicial review in detention in Curaçao violate Articles 3 and 5 § 4 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-excessive-use-of-force-and-lack-of-effective-judicial-review-in-detention-in-curacao-violate-articles-3-and-5-4-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-excessive-use-of-force-and-lack-of-effective-judicial-review-in-detention-in-curacao-violate-articles-3-and-5-4-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 21 April 2026, the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published its judgment on the case Y.F.C. and Others v. The Netherlands (Application no. 21325/19). The applicants, a group of Venezuelan nationals, arrived at Curaçao...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:15:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland: The Federal Administrative Court clarifies the principle of subsidiarity in relation to temporary protection for persons from Ukraine]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/switzerland-the-federal-administrative-court-clarifies-the-principle-of-subsidiarity-in-relation-to-temporary-protection-for-persons-from-ukraine" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-the-federal-administrative-court-clarifies-the-principle-of-subsidiarity-in-relation-to-temporary-protection-for-persons-from-ukraine</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 9 February 2026, the Swiss Federal Administrative Court (FAC) delivered the judgment no. D-4601/2025 clarifying the scope of the principle of subsidiarity in the context of temporary protection for persons from Ukraine. The case concerned the refu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:44:11+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion states that the Italy-Albania Protocol is compatible with the EU legislation on return and asylum procedures]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-states-that-the-italy-albania-protocol-is-compatible-with-the-eu-legislation-on-return-and-asylum-procedures" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-states-that-the-italy-albania-protocol-is-compatible-with-the-eu-legislation-on-return-and-asylum-procedures</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 23 April 2026, the Advocate General Emiliou delivered his opinion in Case C‑414/25 (Sedrata) following a request for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy (Corte suprema di cassazione). The case concerned the compatibility...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:42:57+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion on suspension of asylum procedures for beneficiaries of temporary protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-suspension-of-asylum-procedures-for-beneficiaries-of-temporary-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-suspension-of-asylum-procedures-for-beneficiaries-of-temporary-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 April 2026, the Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his opinion in Case C-249/25 (Jilin) following a request for a preliminary reference by the Council of State, Netherlands (Raad van State). The case concerned the interpretation...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:42:17+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the lawfulness of detention and deportation of an Iranian national recognised as refugee from Cyprus to Iran]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-and-deportation-of-an-iranian-national-recognised-as-refugee-from-cyprus-to-iran" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-and-deportation-of-an-iranian-national-recognised-as-refugee-from-cyprus-to-iran</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 8 April 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application of K.P. v. Cyprus (Application no. 30430/25). The case concerns the alleged unlawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending deportation and the risk of ill-tre...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:40:36+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Unlawful detention and inhuman treatment of an unaccompanied child in Italy breach Articles 3, 5 and 13 ECHR  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-unlawful-detention-and-inhuman-treatment-of-an-unaccompanied-child-in-italy-breach-articles-3-5-and-13-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-unlawful-detention-and-inhuman-treatment-of-an-unaccompanied-child-in-italy-breach-articles-3-5-and-13-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 9 April 2026, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in H.D. v. Italy (Application no. 41645/23). The case concerned the placement and prolonged stay of an unaccompanied child in an adult reception c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:39:23+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CCPR: Refusal of access to asylum procedure and prolonged detention in airport transit zone violate Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) ICCPR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ccpr-refusal-of-access-to-asylum-procedure-and-prolonged-detention-in-airport-transit-zone-violate-articles-7-91-and-101-iccpr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ccpr-refusal-of-access-to-asylum-procedure-and-prolonged-detention-in-airport-transit-zone-violate-articles-7-91-and-101-iccpr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 2 April 2026, the Human Rights Committee (CCPR) published its Views in the communication No. 3742/2020 submitted by Gentilmen Issa Magumba against the Republic of Korea, concerning the refusal to process an asylum application lodged in an airport...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:48:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Scope of border procedures and detention of asylum applicants in facilities located within national territory  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-scope-of-border-procedures-and-detention-of-asylum-applicants-in-facilities-located-within-national-territory" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-scope-of-border-procedures-and-detention-of-asylum-applicants-in-facilities-located-within-national-territory</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 April 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in joined Cases C‑50/24 to C‑56/24 (Danané and Others), originating from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Belgian Council for asylum and immigration p...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:45:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Failure to provide reception conditions to asylum applicants in Belgium amounts to the violation of Articles 3, 6 §1 and 34 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-failure-to-provide-reception-conditions-to-asylum-applicants-in-belgium-amounts-to-the-violation-of-articles-3-6-1-and-34-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-failure-to-provide-reception-conditions-to-asylum-applicants-in-belgium-amounts-to-the-violation-of-articles-3-6-1-and-34-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 9 April 2026, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in M.V. and Others v. Belgium (Applications nos. 52836/22 and three others). The case concerned the failure of the Belgian authorities to provide...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:42:38+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Greece: Administrative Court of Thessaloniki refers a preliminary question to the CJEU on the interpretation of Article 46 of the Asylum Procedures Directive]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/greece-administrative-court-of-thessaloniki-refers-a-preliminary-question-to-the-cjeu-on-the-interpretation-of-article-46-of-the-asylum-procedures-directive" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/greece-administrative-court-of-thessaloniki-refers-a-preliminary-question-to-the-cjeu-on-the-interpretation-of-article-46-of-the-asylum-procedures-directive</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 19 March 2026, the Administrative Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki published a decision referring a preliminary question to the CJEU regarding the interpretation of Article 46 of Directive 2013/32 (the Asylum Procedures Directive – APD). Th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:37:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands: The Council of State orders Minister to facilitate students’ departure from Gaza in interim relief proceedings]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/netherlands-the-council-of-state-orders-minister-to-facilitate-students-departure-from-gaza-in-interim-relief-proceedings" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/netherlands-the-council-of-state-orders-minister-to-facilitate-students-departure-from-gaza-in-interim-relief-proceedings</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 19 March 2026, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Dutch Council of State (Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State) delivered its judgments nos. 202600650/2/V6 and 202600651/2/V6 on applications for interim relief submitted...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:36:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: National courts of last instance must provide specific reasons when declining a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-national-courts-of-last-instance-must-provide-specific-reasons-when-declining-a-preliminary-ruling-under-article-267-tfeu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-national-courts-of-last-instance-must-provide-specific-reasons-when-declining-a-preliminary-ruling-under-article-267-tfeu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 24 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in the Case C‑767/23 (Remling). The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State, Net...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:34:37+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Limits on return decisions for illegally staying third-country nationals where removal is precluded by non-refoulement]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-limits-on-return-decisions-for-illegally-staying-third-country-nationals-where-removal-is-precluded-by-non-refoulement" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-limits-on-return-decisions-for-illegally-staying-third-country-nationals-where-removal-is-precluded-by-non-refoulement</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 26 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in the Case C-202/25 (Tadmur), following a request for a preliminary ruling from the District Court of The Hague, sitting in Roermond (Den Haag, zittingsplaats...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:31:32+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Article 3 violation in the event of applicant’s removal to Afghanistan]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-article-3-violation-in-the-event-of-applicants-removal-to-afghanistan" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-article-3-violation-in-the-event-of-applicants-removal-to-afghanistan</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 26 March 2026, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published its judgment in the case of D.M. v. Sweden (Application no. 32694/23). The case concerned the removal of an Afghan national of Hazara ethnicity from Sweden to...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:29:30+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Court of Cassation upholds detention of asylum applicant using false travel documents at the border]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-court-of-cassation-upholds-detention-of-asylum-applicant-using-false-travel-documents-at-the-border" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-court-of-cassation-upholds-detention-of-asylum-applicant-using-false-travel-documents-at-the-border</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 17 March 2026, the Court of Cassation (Hof van Cassatie) dismissed an appeal against a judgment of the Brussels Court of Appeal (Hof van beroep te Brussel) upholding the detention of an asylum applicant at the border following the use of forged tr...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:21:40+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Sweden: Migration Court of Appeal rules that identity documents issued by the country of origin are not required for recognised refugees to obtain long-term resident status ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/sweden-migration-court-of-appeal-rules-that-identity-documents-issued-by-the-country-of-origin-are-not-required-for-recognised-refugees-to-obtain-long-term-resident-status" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/sweden-migration-court-of-appeal-rules-that-identity-documents-issued-by-the-country-of-origin-are-not-required-for-recognised-refugees-to-obtain-long-term-resident-status</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 March 2026, the Migration Court of Appeal (Migrationsöverdomstolen) annulled the decisions of the Malmö Administrative Court and the Swedish Migration Agency which had rejected a refugee’s application for long-term resident status on the ground...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:20:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Scope of Member States’ obligations for issuing family reunification visas under the Family Reunification Directive]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-scope-of-member-states-obligations-for-issuing-family-reunification-visas-under-the-family-reunification-directive" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-scope-of-member-states-obligations-for-issuing-family-reunification-visas-under-the-family-reunification-directive</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 26 March 2026, the CJEU delivered its judgment in the case  C-819/25 (PPU) [Gonrieh] originating from the preliminary reference by the French-speaking Brussels Court of First Instance (Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles) regard...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:16:05+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU:  Responsibilities under the Dublin III Regulation in case of a unilateral suspension of transfers by a Member State responsible for examining an asylum application]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-responsibilities-under-the-dublin-iii-regulation-in-case-of-a-unilateral-suspension-of-transfers-by-a-member-state-responsible-for-examining-an-asylum-application" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-responsibilities-under-the-dublin-iii-regulation-in-case-of-a-unilateral-suspension-of-transfers-by-a-member-state-responsible-for-examining-an-asylum-application</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in the Case C-458/24 (Daraa). The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Administrative Court of Sigmaringen, Germany (Verwaltungsgericht Sig...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:15:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: High Court annuls removal decision of asylum applicants and affirms their right to seek international protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/spain-high-court-annuls-removal-decision-of-asylum-applicants-and-affirms-their-right-to-seek-international-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/spain-high-court-annuls-removal-decision-of-asylum-applicants-and-affirms-their-right-to-seek-international-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 28 November 2025, the High Court of Justice of Andalusia, Ceuta and Melilla – Málaga Administrative Chamber (Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía, Ceuta y Melilla - Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo de Málaga) issued the judgment No. 243...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T10:43:24+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Court of First Instance of Antwerp annuls revocation decision of Belgian nationality for child of Palestinian parents recognised as refugees  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-court-of-first-instance-of-antwerp-annuls-revocation-decision-of-belgian-nationality-for-child-of-palestinian-parents-recognised-as-refugees" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-court-of-first-instance-of-antwerp-annuls-revocation-decision-of-belgian-nationality-for-child-of-palestinian-parents-recognised-as-refugees</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 27 February 2026, the Court of First Instance of Antwerp, Family Court Section (Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Antwerpen, familierechtbank) annulled a decision of the civil registrar of the City of Antwerp revoking the Belgian nationality of a child...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T10:42:33+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Successive detention periods for illegally staying third-country nationals under the Return Directive]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-successive-detention-periods-for-illegally-staying-third-country-nationals-under-the-return-directive" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-successive-detention-periods-for-illegally-staying-third-country-nationals-under-the-return-directive</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in the case C-150/34 (Aroja). The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Finland (Korkein oikeus) regarding the calculation...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T10:40:36+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Interpretation of repeated time-limit extensions under the Asylum Procedures Directive]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-interpretation-of-repeated-time-limit-extensions-under-the-asylum-procedures-directive" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-interpretation-of-repeated-time-limit-extensions-under-the-asylum-procedures-directive</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European  Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in the case C-489/24 (Safita). The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Council of the State of The Netherlands (Raad van State) concernin...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T10:38:26+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the lawfulness of detention and risk of ill-treatment in the context of removal of a Burundian national from Cyprus]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-and-risk-of-ill-treatment-in-the-context-of-removal-of-a-burundian-national-from-cyprus" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-and-risk-of-ill-treatment-in-the-context-of-removal-of-a-burundian-national-from-cyprus</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 10 February 2026, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application of C.I. v. Cyprus (Application no. 12347/25). The case concerns the alleged unlawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending deportatio...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T10:35:53+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Constitutional Court suspends national rules on asylum reception and family reunification and refers preliminary questions to the CJEU]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-constitutional-court-suspends-national-rules-on-asylum-reception-and-family-reunification-and-refers-preliminary-questions-to-the-cjeu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-constitutional-court-suspends-national-rules-on-asylum-reception-and-family-reunification-and-refers-preliminary-questions-to-the-cjeu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 26 February 2026, the Belgian Constitutional Court delivered its judgments nos. 23/2026 and 24/2026, suspending, respectively, provisions of two Laws of 14 July 2025 reforming the reception regime for asylum applicants, and provisions of the Act o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:28:29+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Council for Aliens' Law Litigation annuls inadmissibility decisions for beneficiaries of international protection in Greece]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-council-for-aliens-law-litigation-annuls-inadmissibility-decisions-for-beneficiaries-of-international-protection-in-greece" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-aliens-law-litigation-annuls-inadmissibility-decisions-for-beneficiaries-of-international-protection-in-greece</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Belgium: Council for Aliens' Law Litigation annuls inadmissibility decisions for beneficiaries of international protection in GreeceOn 20 February 2026, the United Chambers of the Council for Aliens’ Law Litigation (RvV-CCE) (CALL) annulled three ina...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:27:36+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General's Opinion on Member States' obligations for family reunification visa beneficiaries]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-member-states-obligations-for-family-reunification-visa-beneficiaries" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-member-states-obligations-for-family-reunification-visa-beneficiaries</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5 March 2026, the Advocate General Rimvydas Norkus issued his opinion in the case C-819/25 (PPU) [Gonrieh]. The case related to the preliminary reference by the French-speaking Brussels Court of First Instance (Tribunal de première instance franco...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:25:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Two communicated cases regarding the removal of Syrian nationals from Türkiye]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-regarding-the-removal-of-syrian-nationals-from-turkiye" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-regarding-the-removal-of-syrian-nationals-from-turkiye</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 February 2026, the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published the communicated cases of M.R. v. Türkiye (Application no. 12965/21), and M.S. v. Türkiye (Application no. 20148/25), concerning the removal of Syrian nat...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:24:16+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the lawfulness of deprivation of liberty with the purpose of removal from Türkiye ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-deprivation-of-liberty-with-the-purpose-of-removal-from-turkiye" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-deprivation-of-liberty-with-the-purpose-of-removal-from-turkiye</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 30 January 2026, the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicatedthe application of D.J. v Türkiye (Application no. 37547/22). The case concerns the alleged unlawfulness of the applicant’s deprivation of liberty and hi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:23:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland: Federal Supreme Court rules that requiring Eritrean 'declaration of repentance' for obtaining resident permit is unlawful On 20 November 2025, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court published its judgment on the case 2C_64/2025, and ruled that requi]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/switzerland-federal-supreme-court-rules-that-requiring-eritrean-declaration-of-repentance-for-obtaining-resident-permit-is-unlawful-on-20-november-2025-the-swiss-federal-supreme-court-published-its-judgment-on-the-case-2c-642025-and-ruled-that-requi" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-federal-supreme-court-rules-that-requiring-eritrean-declaration-of-repentance-for-obtaining-resident-permit-is-unlawful-on-20-november-2025-the-swiss-federal-supreme-court-published-its-judgment-on-the-case-2c-642025-and-ruled-that-requi</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 20 November 2025, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court published its judgment on the case 2C_64/2025, and ruled that requiring Eritrean nationals to sign a ‘declaration of repentance’ at the Eritrean consulate in order to obtain a residence permit on t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:20:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Lithuania: Supreme Administrative Court rules that summary expulsions at the Belarus border are unlawful]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/lithuania-supreme-administrative-court-rules-that-summary-expulsions-at-the-belarus-border-are-unlawful" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/lithuania-supreme-administrative-court-rules-that-summary-expulsions-at-the-belarus-border-are-unlawful</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 30 December 2025, the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania published its judgment on the case No eA-820-552/2025 ,  ruling that the denial of the right to seek for international protection violates international and EU Law.On 23 October 2023,...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:18:29+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CAT: Australia’s extraterritorial responsibility for acts of torture and ill-treatment in the context of externalized migration policies]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cat-australias-extraterritorial-responsibility-for-acts-of-torture-and-ill-treatment-in-the-context-of-externalized-migration-policies" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cat-australias-extraterritorial-responsibility-for-acts-of-torture-and-ill-treatment-in-the-context-of-externalized-migration-policies</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 23 January 2026, the Committee Against Torture of the United Nations (CAT) published its decision in the Communication No. 1079/2021 submitted by A.A. against Australia. The communication concerns the lawfulness of prolonged detention in Australia...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:17:05+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: The relevant domestic court and the applicant must have access to information on the basis of which an asylum decision will be made]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-the-relevant-domestic-court-and-the-applicant-must-have-access-to-information-on-the-basis-of-which-an-asylum-decision-will-be-made" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-the-relevant-domestic-court-and-the-applicant-must-have-access-to-information-on-the-basis-of-which-an-asylum-decision-will-be-made</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 29 January 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in the case C-431/24 (Multan). The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the District Court of The Hague, Netherlands (Rechtbank Den Haag, zi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:15:06+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the lawfulness of removal of a Turkmenistan national from Türkiye]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-removal-of-a-turkmenistan-national-from-turkiye" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-removal-of-a-turkmenistan-national-from-turkiye</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 22 January 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application of D.A. v. Türkiye (Application no. 5393/25). The case concerns the alleged failure of the domestic authorities to duly assess the risk of death or ill-treatm...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:13:16+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Serbia violated the ECHR through the unlawful detention and forcible return of Afghan asylum applicants  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-serbia-violated-the-echr-through-the-unlawful-detention-and-forcible-return-of-afghan-asylum-applicants" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-serbia-violated-the-echr-through-the-unlawful-detention-and-forcible-return-of-afghan-asylum-applicants</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 3 February 2026, the Third Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published its judgment on the case of O.H. and Others v. Serbia (Application no. 57185/17). The case concerned the removal of Afghan applicants to Bulgaria after they...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:11:33+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion on return decisions for imprisoned third-country nationals]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-return-decisions-for-imprisoned-third-country-nationals" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-return-decisions-for-imprisoned-third-country-nationals</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 22 January 2026, the Advocate General Spielmann issues his opinion in the case C-877/24 (Shamsi). The case related to the preliminary reference by the  Council of State of the Netherlands regarding the scope of Directive 2008/115/EC (Returns Direc...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:09:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Interpretation of the ‘safe third country’ concept and the application of its procedural guarantees in asylum procedures.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-interpretation-of-the-safe-third-country-concept-and-the-application-of-its-procedural-guarantees-in-asylum-procedures" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-interpretation-of-the-safe-third-country-concept-and-the-application-of-its-procedural-guarantees-in-asylum-procedures</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5th of February 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in case C-718/24 (Aleb). The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Administrative Court of Sofia, Bulgaria (Administrativen sad Sofi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:07:16+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the lawfulness of detention of an Afghan asylum seeker in Lesvos, Greece]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-of-an-afghan-asylum-seeker-in-lesvos-greece" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-of-an-afghan-asylum-seeker-in-lesvos-greece</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On the 1st of December 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application of O.M. v. Greece (Application no. 14354/21), concerning the lawfulness of the detention of an Afghan national who arrived on Lesvos on 30 August 201...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:05:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR:  Inadequate reception conditions for unaccompanied minors in Greece breach Article 3 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-inadequate-reception-conditions-for-unaccompanied-minors-in-greece-breach-article-3-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-inadequate-reception-conditions-for-unaccompanied-minors-in-greece-breach-article-3-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 22 January 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published  its judgment in the case of A.N. and Others v. Greece (Applications nos. 65267/19 and two others) finding that Greece violated Article 3 of the Convention due to inadequate liv...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-05T18:02:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Refusal of access to the labour market due to delays in the asylum procedure may be attributed to the applicant only for the period of time that is linked to their share of responsibility  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-refusal-of-access-to-the-labour-market-due-to-delays-in-the-asylum-procedure-may-be-attributed-to-the-applicant-only-for-the-period-of-time-that-is-linked-to-their-share-of-responsibility" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-refusal-of-access-to-the-labour-market-due-to-delays-in-the-asylum-procedure-may-be-attributed-to-the-applicant-only-for-the-period-of-time-that-is-linked-to-their-share-of-responsibility</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 15 January 2026, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled in case C-742/24 [Havvitt] concerning the reasons to refuse access to labour market for an applicant for international protection. The case concerned an asylum applicant’s delay in submitting t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:33:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Clarification on the calculation of time limits under Article 29 DRIII where a judicial body decides on the legality of a second transfer decision ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-clarification-on-the-calculation-of-time-limits-under-article-29-driii-where-a-judicial-body-decides-on-the-legality-of-a-second-transfer-decision" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-clarification-on-the-calculation-of-time-limits-under-article-29-driii-where-a-judicial-body-decides-on-the-legality-of-a-second-transfer-decision</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 December, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) published its judgment in the case C-560/23 Tang regarding a preliminary question submitted by the Danish Refugee Board (Copenhagen) on the interpretation of the time limits for carrying out a Dub...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:32:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Danish public housing legislation may constitute direct and indirect discrimination on the basis of ethnic origin ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-danish-public-housing-legislation-may-constitute-direct-and-indirect-discrimination-on-the-basis-of-ethnic-origin" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-danish-public-housing-legislation-may-constitute-direct-and-indirect-discrimination-on-the-basis-of-ethnic-origin</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 December 2025, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) delivered its judgment in case C-417/23 (Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab, Afdeling Schackenborgvænge).   The case arose from a request for a preliminary ruling by the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:32:26+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Refusal of transfer to a different reception centre cannot justify withdrawal of all material reception conditions ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-refusal-of-transfer-to-a-different-reception-centre-cannot-justify-withdrawal-of-all-material-reception-conditions" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-refusal-of-transfer-to-a-different-reception-centre-cannot-justify-withdrawal-of-all-material-reception-conditions</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 December the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C‑184/24 (Sidi Bouzid). The case concerns AF and his minor child BF, applicants for international protection in Milan, who challenge the withdrawal of the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:31:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Two communicated cases on the removal of Syrian nationals from Türkiye]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-on-the-removal-of-syrian-nationals-from-turkiye" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-on-the-removal-of-syrian-nationals-from-turkiye</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 19 January 2026, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (the “Court”) published the communicated case of  K.A. v. Türkiye (Application no. 13754/25) and the case of  A.H. v. Türkiye (Application no. 20237/25). The case of K.A. con...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:31:15+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case regarding the removal from Türkiye to Iran ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-regarding-the-removal-from-turkiye-to-iran" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-regarding-the-removal-from-turkiye-to-iran</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 19 January 2026, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (the “Court”) published the communicated case of H.K.T. and I.T. v. Türkiye (Application no. 36370/21). The case concerns an Iranian couple who claim a risk of persecution in...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T15:30:49+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
