<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/news</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/news" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[News]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>News published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-10-02T11:35:52+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Greece: Council of State upholds NGO registration system but finds certain requirements contrary to freedom of association and refers questions to the CJEU  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/greece-council-of-state-upholds-ngo-registration-system-but-finds-certain-requirements-contrary-to-freedom-of-association-and-refers-questions-to-the-cjeu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/greece-council-of-state-upholds-ngo-registration-system-but-finds-certain-requirements-contrary-to-freedom-of-association-and-refers-questions-to-the-cjeu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Greek Council of State (Συμβούλιο της Επικρατείας) examined three cases concerning the registration requirements applicable to NGOs active in international protection, migration and social integration, under Article 78 of Law 4939/2022 and Minist...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-02T11:35:52+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands: District Court of the Hague rules on the scope of judicial review in asylum proceedings following the CJEU judgments in Quotal and Ebilum]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/netherlands-district-court-of-the-hague-rules-on-the-scope-of-judicial-review-in-asylum-proceedings-following-the-cjeu-judgments-in-quotal-and-ebilum" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/netherlands-district-court-of-the-hague-rules-on-the-scope-of-judicial-review-in-asylum-proceedings-following-the-cjeu-judgments-in-quotal-and-ebilum</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 28 July 2026, the District Court of the Hague delivered its judgments ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2026:21085 and ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2026:21092 following the CJEU’s preliminary rulings in Quotal and Ebilum, respectively, concerning the scope of judicial review in asy...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-02T11:33:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Higher Administrative Court rules that compulsory military service in Russia does not in itself warrant subsidiary protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/germany-higher-administrative-court-rules-that-compulsory-military-service-in-russia-does-not-in-itself-warrant-subsidiary-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-higher-administrative-court-rules-that-compulsory-military-service-in-russia-does-not-in-itself-warrant-subsidiary-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 1 July 2026, the Higher Administrative Court of Saxony (Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht) delivered its judgment in case 2A159/24.A concerning the entitlement to subsidiary protection for Russian nationals subject to compulsory military service....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-02T11:33:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Discretionary clause under the Dublin III Regulation also applies where responsibility is determined under the residual criterion]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-discretionary-clause-under-the-dublin-iii-regulation-also-applies-where-responsibility-is-determined-under-the-residual-criterion" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-discretionary-clause-under-the-dublin-iii-regulation-also-applies-where-responsibility-is-determined-under-the-residual-criterion</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 24 September 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C‑511/25 (Prokoda) following a request for a preliminary ruling from the Czech Supreme Administrative Court (Nejvyšší správní soud). The case conce...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-02T11:32:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Inadequate reception and living conditions for asylum applicants in Greece violate Article 3 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-inadequate-reception-and-living-conditions-for-asylum-applicants-in-greece-violate-article-3-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-inadequate-reception-and-living-conditions-for-asylum-applicants-in-greece-violate-article-3-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 24 September 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in A.M. and Others v. Greece, concerning the reception and living conditions of several asylum applicants accommodated in different facilities in Greece.The Court...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-02T11:31:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Federal Constitutional Court rules that individual admission commitments to Afghan nationals cannot be withdrawn without an individual assessment]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/germany-federal-constitutional-court-rules-that-individual-admission-commitments-to-afghan-nationals-cannot-be-withdrawn-without-an-individual-assessment" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-federal-constitutional-court-rules-that-individual-admission-commitments-to-afghan-nationals-cannot-be-withdrawn-without-an-individual-assessment</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 22 July 2026, the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) delivered its decision in case 2 BvR 319/26, concerning the withdrawal of admission commitments previously issued to Afghan nationals under Germany’s humanitarian admission...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-21T08:48:10+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion on restrictions imposed on third-country nationals in return detention]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-restrictions-imposed-on-third-country-nationals-in-return-detention" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-restrictions-imposed-on-third-country-nationals-in-return-detention</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 3 September 2026, Advocate General Norkus delivered his opinion in the Case C-218/25 (Wompou) following a request for a preliminary ruling from the District Court of The Hague, sitting in Amsterdam (Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam). I...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-21T08:47:14+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Refusal of family reunification with children born of polygamous marriages does not violate Article 8 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-refusal-of-family-reunification-with-children-born-of-polygamous-marriages-does-not-violate-article-8-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-refusal-of-family-reunification-with-children-born-of-polygamous-marriages-does-not-violate-article-8-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 8 September 2026, the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in A.A. v. the Netherlands (Application no. 7481/23), concerning the refusal of family reunification with five of the applicant’s minor child...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-21T08:45:41+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Detention of an unaccompanied child in an Italian reception centre without a clear legal basis violates Article 5 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-detention-of-an-unaccompanied-child-in-an-italian-reception-centre-without-a-clear-legal-basis-violates-article-5-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-detention-of-an-unaccompanied-child-in-an-italian-reception-centre-without-a-clear-legal-basis-violates-article-5-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 3 September 2026, the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in B.C. v. Italy (Application no. 42909/23) concerning the deprivation of liberty of an unaccompanied child in a reception centre in Brindisi,...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-21T08:45:05+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning residence and reporting obligations imposed on a stateless person pending return in Denmark]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-residence-and-reporting-obligations-imposed-on-a-stateless-person-pending-return-in-denmark" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-residence-and-reporting-obligations-imposed-on-a-stateless-person-pending-return-in-denmark</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 10 July 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the case Jovanovic v. Denmark (Application no. 24677/26), concerning the residence and reporting obligations imposed on the applicant following an expulsion order that could not...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-21T08:44:13+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Constitutional Court annuls provisions on absconding and alternatives to detention concerning irregularly staying third-country nationals and refers questions on mandatory medical examinations to the CJEU]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-constitutional-court-annuls-provisions-on-absconding-and-alternatives-to-detention-concerning-irregularly-staying-third-country-nationals-and-refers-questions-on-mandatory-medical-examinations-to-the-cjeu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-constitutional-court-annuls-provisions-on-absconding-and-alternatives-to-detention-concerning-irregularly-staying-third-country-nationals-and-refers-questions-on-mandatory-medical-examinations-to-the-cjeu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 July 2026, the Belgian Constitutional Court delivered its judgment no. 89/2026 concerning two actions for annulment brought by several organisations against provisions of the Act of 12 May 2024, which introduced measures aimed at strengthening...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-13T12:34:29+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: Supreme Court rules that the special border rejection regime for Ceuta and Melilla does not apply to persons intercepted at sea]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/spain-supreme-court-rules-that-the-special-border-rejection-regime-for-ceuta-and-melilla-does-not-apply-to-persons-intercepted-at-sea" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/spain-supreme-court-rules-that-the-special-border-rejection-regime-for-ceuta-and-melilla-does-not-apply-to-persons-intercepted-at-sea</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 29 June 2026, the Spanish Supreme Court delivered its judgment no. 814/2026 in cassation proceedings no. 3795/2025, concerning the scope of the special rejection at the border (rechazo en frontera) regime under Additional Provision 10 of Organic L...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-13T12:32:58+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Administrative Court of Gelsenkirchen disapplies a national transitional provision for its incompatibility with EU law]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/germany-administrative-court-of-gelsenkirchen-disapplies-a-national-transitional-provision-for-its-incompatibility-with-eu-law" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-administrative-court-of-gelsenkirchen-disapplies-a-national-transitional-provision-for-its-incompatibility-with-eu-law</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 June 2026, the Administrative Court of Gelsenkirchen delivered its judgment in case no. 19a K 5383/23.A, concerning the application of Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 (the ''Qualification Regulation'') to pending asylum procedures. The case concerned...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-13T12:31:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Two communicated cases concerning the compatibility of expulsion orders and re-entry bans with the right to respect for private and family life in Denmark]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-concerning-the-compatibility-of-expulsion-orders-and-re-entry-bans-with-the-right-to-respect-for-private-and-family-life-in-denmark" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-concerning-the-compatibility-of-expulsion-orders-and-re-entry-bans-with-the-right-to-respect-for-private-and-family-life-in-denmark</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 10 July 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the applications of Mohseni v. Denmark (Application no. 17821/26) and Alazem v. Denmark (Application no. 18315/26).Both applicants had entered Denmark as children and were subse...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-13T12:29:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning prolonged residence and reporting obligations imposed on a stateless person in Denmark  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-prolonged-residence-and-reporting-obligations-imposed-on-a-stateless-person-in-denmark" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-prolonged-residence-and-reporting-obligations-imposed-on-a-stateless-person-in-denmark</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 2 July 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the case Akkaoui v. Denmark (Application no. 21546/26) concerning the residence and reporting obligations imposed on the applicant at a return centre following an expulsion order...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-13T12:28:37+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the alleged unlawful deportation to Iran and the lack of procedural safeguards in Cyprus]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-alleged-unlawful-deportation-to-iran-and-the-lack-of-procedural-safeguards-in-cyprus" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-alleged-unlawful-deportation-to-iran-and-the-lack-of-procedural-safeguards-in-cyprus</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 24 June 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application Ali Khaledi Batrashi and Others v. Cyprus (Application no. 29564/25). The case concerns the alleged unlawful deportation of the first applicant to Iran without a...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:07:26+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the alleged risk of ill-treatment upon return and the failure to properly assess an asylum claim in the Netherlands]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-alleged-risk-of-ill-treatment-upon-return-and-the-failure-to-properly-assess-an-asylum-claim-in-the-netherlands" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-alleged-risk-of-ill-treatment-upon-return-and-the-failure-to-properly-assess-an-asylum-claim-in-the-netherlands</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 24 June 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application of G.B. v. the Netherlands (Application no. 7740/26). The case concerns the alleged risk of ill-treatment of the applicant if returned to her country of origin,...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:06:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Constitutional Court annuls provisions governing the residence permit procedure for stateless persons]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-constitutional-court-annuls-provisions-governing-the-residence-permit-procedure-for-stateless-persons" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-constitutional-court-annuls-provisions-governing-the-residence-permit-procedure-for-stateless-persons</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 25 June 2026, the Constitutional Court of Belgium (Grondwettelijk Hof) delivered its judgment no. 78/2026, concerning the procedure introduced by the Act of 10 March 2024 for granting a residence permit to stateless persons. The applicants challen...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:05:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Greece: Administrative Court of Thessaloniki refers questions on electronic notification of asylum decisions to the Court of Justice of the EU]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/greece-administrative-court-of-thessaloniki-refers-questions-on-electronic-notification-of-asylum-decisions-to-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/greece-administrative-court-of-thessaloniki-refers-questions-on-electronic-notification-of-asylum-decisions-to-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 18 June 2026, the First Instance Administrative Court of Thessaloniki published its decision to refer a preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the EU regarding the compatibility with EU law of electronic notification of decisions on asylu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:03:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Abolition of mandatory legal representation in deportation detention proceedings]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/germany-abolition-of-mandatory-legal-representation-in-deportation-detention-proceedings" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-abolition-of-mandatory-legal-representation-in-deportation-detention-proceedings</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 1 June 2026, entered into force the abolition of mandatory legal representation in deportation detention proceedings in Germany, which was regulated in Section 62d of the Residence Act (Aufenthaltsgesetz). The amendment was introduced by the Act o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:01:52+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Procedural safeguards in return proceedings against family members of Union citizens on national security grounds]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-procedural-safeguards-in-return-proceedings-against-family-members-of-union-citizens-on-national-security-grounds" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-procedural-safeguards-in-return-proceedings-against-family-members-of-union-citizens-on-national-security-grounds</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 July 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C‑26/25 (Bukla) following a request for a preliminary ruling from the Szeged High Court of Hungary (Szegedi Törvényszék). The case concerned the interpr...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:01:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECSR: Indirect discrimination and lack of effective access to healthcare for vulnerable EU nationals in Sweden in breach of the European Social Charter]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecsr-indirect-discrimination-and-lack-of-effective-access-to-healthcare-for-vulnerable-eu-nationals-in-sweden-in-breach-of-the-european-social-charter" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecsr-indirect-discrimination-and-lack-of-effective-access-to-healthcare-for-vulnerable-eu-nationals-in-sweden-in-breach-of-the-european-social-charter</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 26 June 2026, the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) published its decision on the case Amnesty International and Médecins du Monde – International v. Sweden (Complaint No. 227/2023).The complaint concerned access to healthcare for vulnera...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-24T10:00:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Administrative Court recognises refugee status for Westernised women from Iraq as members of a particular social group facing persecution]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/germany-administrative-court-recognises-refugee-status-for-westernised-women-from-iraq-as-members-of-a-particular-social-group-facing-persecution" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-administrative-court-recognises-refugee-status-for-westernised-women-from-iraq-as-members-of-a-particular-social-group-facing-persecution</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 15 May 2026, the Administrative Court of Hanover (Verwaltungsgericht Hannover) delivered its judgment in case 3 A 739/24, concerning the recognition of refugee status based on ‘’Westernised’’ identity and gender-based persecution in Iraq.The first...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-07T12:34:30+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Federal Administrative Court rules that refugee recognition in another Member State does not entail a right to a residence permit in Germany]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/germany-federal-administrative-court-rules-that-refugee-recognition-in-another-member-state-does-not-entail-a-right-to-a-residence-permit-in-germany" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-federal-administrative-court-rules-that-refugee-recognition-in-another-member-state-does-not-entail-a-right-to-a-residence-permit-in-germany</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[ On 24 March 2026, the Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) delivered its decision in case BVerwG 1 C 6.25. The case concerned whether Germany was required to grant a residence permit to a person who had previously been recognised...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-07T12:33:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Failure to ensure effective refugee family reunification procedures in Greece in breach of Articles 8 and 13 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-failure-to-ensure-effective-refugee-family-reunification-procedures-in-greece-in-breach-of-articles-8-and-13-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-failure-to-ensure-effective-refugee-family-reunification-procedures-in-greece-in-breach-of-articles-8-and-13-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 23 June 2026, the Third Section of the European Court of Human Rights delivered three judgments concerning the prolonged failure by the Greek authorities to decide on family reunification applications lodged by recognised refugees in Greece: T.N....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-07-07T12:32:38+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Greece: Council of State ruled that the absolute prohibition of access to classified information in revocation case is unlawful]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/greece-council-of-state-ruled-that-the-absolute-prohibition-of-access-to-classified-information-in-revocation-case-is-unlawful" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/greece-council-of-state-ruled-that-the-absolute-prohibition-of-access-to-classified-information-in-revocation-case-is-unlawful</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 21 April 2026, the Council of State ruled on the lawfulness of the prohibition of access to classified information in the case of a Syrian national who was granted refugee status in 2017 and was later subject to a revocation procedure based on cla...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-22T11:19:31+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom: High Court declares that the Secretary of State’s amendments to the Allocation of Asylum Accommodation Policy are unlawful for failure to consult and assess their impact on vulnerable asylum applicants]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/united-kingdom-high-court-declares-that-the-secretary-of-states-amendments-to-the-allocation-of-asylum-accommodation-policy-are-unlawful-for-failure-to-consult-and-assess-their-impact-on-vulnerable-asylum-applicants" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/united-kingdom-high-court-declares-that-the-secretary-of-states-amendments-to-the-allocation-of-asylum-accommodation-policy-are-unlawful-for-failure-to-consult-and-assess-their-impact-on-vulnerable-asylum-applicants</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 28 May 2026, the High Court of Justice (King’s Bench Division, Administrative Court) delivered its judgment in Freedom from Torture & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2026 EWHC 1278 (Admin)). The case concerned the challenge to t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-22T11:18:06+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France: CNDA recognises refugee status due to systematic persecution of the Fur ethnic group in North Darfur (Sudan)  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/france-cnda-recognises-refugee-status-due-to-systematic-persecution-of-the-fur-ethnic-group-in-north-darfur-sudan" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/france-cnda-recognises-refugee-status-due-to-systematic-persecution-of-the-fur-ethnic-group-in-north-darfur-sudan</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[ On 12 May 2026, the National Court of Asylum (CNDA) delivered its decision N°26006334 concerning the protection status to be granted to a Sudanese national of Fur ethnic origin from North Darfur, in light of the situation of persecution affecting th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-22T11:17:30+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion on the compatibility of detention facilities established outside the EU under bilateral agreements with EU law]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-the-compatibility-of-detention-facilities-established-outside-the-eu-under-bilateral-agreements-with-eu-law" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-the-compatibility-of-detention-facilities-established-outside-the-eu-under-bilateral-agreements-with-eu-law</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 11 June 2026, the Advocate General Laila Medina delivered her opinion in the Joined Cases C-706/25 and C-707/25 (Comeri and Sidilli). The cases concerned the compatibility of the Italian legislation implementing the Italy–Albania bilateral agreeme...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-22T11:16:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion concerning judicial review and non-refoulement assessment in return decisions with multiple countries of destination]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-concerning-judicial-review-and-non-refoulement-assessment-in-return-decisions-with-multiple-countries-of-destination" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-concerning-judicial-review-and-non-refoulement-assessment-in-return-decisions-with-multiple-countries-of-destination</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 4 June 2026, Advocate General Jean Richard de la Tour delivered his opinion in Case C-182/26 PPU (Hardeker), concerning the interpretation of Directive 2008/115/EC (the ‘Return Directive’), including whether a return decision may designate more th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-22T11:15:50+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion on the EU solidarity mechanism and compliance with the principle of subsidiarity ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-the-eu-solidarity-mechanism-and-compliance-with-the-principle-of-subsidiarity" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-the-eu-solidarity-mechanism-and-compliance-with-the-principle-of-subsidiarity</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 4 June 2026 the Advocate General delivered her opinion on Case C-553/24, (Assemblée nationale v Parliament and Council), arising from an action brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) by the National Assembly of the French...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-17T14:24:50+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Limits on reduction of material reception conditions for applicants awaiting transfer under the Dublin Regulation and interpretation of “subsequent application”]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-limits-on-reduction-of-material-reception-conditions-for-applicants-awaiting-transfer-under-the-dublin-regulation-and-interpretation-of-subsequent-application" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-limits-on-reduction-of-material-reception-conditions-for-applicants-awaiting-transfer-under-the-dublin-regulation-and-interpretation-of-subsequent-application</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 4 June 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-621/24 (Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB), following a request for a preliminary ruling from the German Federal Social Court (Bundessozialgericht). The case...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-17T14:23:14+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Scope of first-instance judicial review in asylum appeals and interpretation of a well-founded fear of persecution ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-scope-of-first-instance-judicial-review-in-asylum-appeals-and-interpretation-of-a-well-founded-fear-of-persecution" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-scope-of-first-instance-judicial-review-in-asylum-appeals-and-interpretation-of-a-well-founded-fear-of-persecution</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 4 July 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Case C‑440/25 (Ebilum), following a request for a preliminary ruling by the District Court of The Hague, sitting in Zwolle (rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-17T14:21:57+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Scope of judicial review in asylum appeals and power of first-instance courts to reassess facts and grant international protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-scope-of-judicial-review-in-asylum-appeals-and-power-of-first-instance-courts-to-reassess-facts-and-grant-international-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-scope-of-judicial-review-in-asylum-appeals-and-power-of-first-instance-courts-to-reassess-facts-and-grant-international-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 4 June 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Case C‑198/25  (Quotal), originating from a request for a preliminary ruling by the District Court of The Hague, sitting in Zwolle (rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaat...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-17T14:20:28+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Constitutional Court restores the possibility of financial assistance for asylum applicants in exceptional circumstances]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/belgium-constitutional-court-restores-the-possibility-of-financial-assistance-for-asylum-applicants-in-exceptional-circumstances" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-constitutional-court-restores-the-possibility-of-financial-assistance-for-asylum-applicants-in-exceptional-circumstances</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 21 May 2026, the Belgian Constitutional Court delivered its judgment no. 66/2026 . The case concerned legislative amendments to the asylum reception regime introduced by two Laws of 14 July 2025: (i) the limitation of material assistance for asylu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-29T14:14:31+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (IAC) Country Guidance Judgment on Iraq: Identity Documentation and Returns]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/united-kingdom-upper-tribunal-iac-country-guidance-judgment-on-iraq-identity-documentation-and-returns" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/united-kingdom-upper-tribunal-iac-country-guidance-judgment-on-iraq-identity-documentation-and-returns</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 14 April 2026, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) promulgated its country guidance judgment in AH, AK & AJ (Identity documentation; returns to the KRI)Iraq CG UKUT 00150 (IAC), replacing all previous Iraq country guidance, includi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-29T14:11:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: No violation of the Convention in case of expulsion under the EU-Türkiye Statement and violation of Article 3 due to inadequate detention conditions ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-no-violation-of-the-convention-in-case-of-expulsion-under-the-eu-turkiye-statement-and-violation-of-article-3-due-to-inadequate-detention-conditions" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-no-violation-of-the-convention-in-case-of-expulsion-under-the-eu-turkiye-statement-and-violation-of-article-3-due-to-inadequate-detention-conditions</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 26 May 2026, the Third Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in J.B. v. Greece (Application no. 54796/16). The case concerns the potential return of the applicant from Greece to Türkiye under the EU-Türkiye S...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-29T14:08:07+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Residence requirement for social assistance and employment support constitutes indirect discrimination against beneficiaries of international protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-residence-requirement-for-social-assistance-and-employment-support-constitutes-indirect-discrimination-against-beneficiaries-of-international-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-residence-requirement-for-social-assistance-and-employment-support-constitutes-indirect-discrimination-against-beneficiaries-of-international-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 7 May 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-747/22 (KH v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)), following a request for a preliminary ruling from the District Court, Bergamo, Italy (...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:17:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Compatibility of indefinite entry bans with EU law under Directive 2008/115 in the context of national security ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-compatibility-of-indefinite-entry-bans-with-eu-law-under-directive-2008115-in-the-context-of-national-security" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-compatibility-of-indefinite-entry-bans-with-eu-law-under-directive-2008115-in-the-context-of-national-security</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 23 April 2026 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-446/24 (Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT) originating from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Higher Administrative Court, Land of Bremen, Germany...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:16:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Two communicated cases concerning the removal of Afghan nationals from Sweden]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-concerning-the-removal-of-afghan-nationals-from-sweden" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-two-communicated-cases-concerning-the-removal-of-afghan-nationals-from-sweden</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 27 April, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published the communicated cases of S.H. v. Sweden (Application no. 38099/25) and A.G. v. Sweden (Application no. 38572/25), concerning the removal of Afghan nationals from...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:16:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Inadequate detention conditions and unlawful detention in Türkiye violate Articles 3 and 5 § 1 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-inadequate-detention-conditions-and-unlawful-detention-in-turkiye-violate-articles-3-and-5-1-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-inadequate-detention-conditions-and-unlawful-detention-in-turkiye-violate-articles-3-and-5-1-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 5 May 2026 the Second Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in Z.A. and K.S. v. Türkiye (Applications nos. 36449/17). The two applicants, nationals from Kyrgyzstan and Russia, entered Türkiye and subsequently...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:15:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Excessive use of force and lack of effective judicial review in detention in Curaçao violate Articles 3 and 5 § 4 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-excessive-use-of-force-and-lack-of-effective-judicial-review-in-detention-in-curacao-violate-articles-3-and-5-4-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-excessive-use-of-force-and-lack-of-effective-judicial-review-in-detention-in-curacao-violate-articles-3-and-5-4-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 21 April 2026, the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) published its judgment on the case Y.F.C. and Others v. The Netherlands (Application no. 21325/19). The applicants, a group of Venezuelan nationals, arrived at Curaçao...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:15:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland: The Federal Administrative Court clarifies the principle of subsidiarity in relation to temporary protection for persons from Ukraine]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/switzerland-the-federal-administrative-court-clarifies-the-principle-of-subsidiarity-in-relation-to-temporary-protection-for-persons-from-ukraine" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-the-federal-administrative-court-clarifies-the-principle-of-subsidiarity-in-relation-to-temporary-protection-for-persons-from-ukraine</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 9 February 2026, the Swiss Federal Administrative Court (FAC) delivered the judgment no. D-4601/2025 clarifying the scope of the principle of subsidiarity in the context of temporary protection for persons from Ukraine. The case concerned the refu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:44:11+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion states that the Italy-Albania Protocol is compatible with the EU legislation on return and asylum procedures]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-states-that-the-italy-albania-protocol-is-compatible-with-the-eu-legislation-on-return-and-asylum-procedures" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-states-that-the-italy-albania-protocol-is-compatible-with-the-eu-legislation-on-return-and-asylum-procedures</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 23 April 2026, the Advocate General Emiliou delivered his opinion in Case C‑414/25 (Sedrata) following a request for a preliminary ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy (Corte suprema di cassazione). The case concerned the compatibility...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:42:57+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Advocate General’s Opinion on suspension of asylum procedures for beneficiaries of temporary protection]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-suspension-of-asylum-procedures-for-beneficiaries-of-temporary-protection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-advocate-generals-opinion-on-suspension-of-asylum-procedures-for-beneficiaries-of-temporary-protection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 April 2026, the Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his opinion in Case C-249/25 (Jilin) following a request for a preliminary reference by the Council of State, Netherlands (Raad van State). The case concerned the interpretation...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:42:17+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Communicated case concerning the lawfulness of detention and deportation of an Iranian national recognised as refugee from Cyprus to Iran]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-and-deportation-of-an-iranian-national-recognised-as-refugee-from-cyprus-to-iran" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-communicated-case-concerning-the-lawfulness-of-detention-and-deportation-of-an-iranian-national-recognised-as-refugee-from-cyprus-to-iran</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 8 April 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) communicated the application of K.P. v. Cyprus (Application no. 30430/25). The case concerns the alleged unlawfulness of the applicant’s detention pending deportation and the risk of ill-tre...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:40:36+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Unlawful detention and inhuman treatment of an unaccompanied child in Italy breach Articles 3, 5 and 13 ECHR  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-unlawful-detention-and-inhuman-treatment-of-an-unaccompanied-child-in-italy-breach-articles-3-5-and-13-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-unlawful-detention-and-inhuman-treatment-of-an-unaccompanied-child-in-italy-breach-articles-3-5-and-13-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 9 April 2026, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in H.D. v. Italy (Application no. 41645/23). The case concerned the placement and prolonged stay of an unaccompanied child in an adult reception c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-08T08:39:23+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CCPR: Refusal of access to asylum procedure and prolonged detention in airport transit zone violate Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) ICCPR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ccpr-refusal-of-access-to-asylum-procedure-and-prolonged-detention-in-airport-transit-zone-violate-articles-7-91-and-101-iccpr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ccpr-refusal-of-access-to-asylum-procedure-and-prolonged-detention-in-airport-transit-zone-violate-articles-7-91-and-101-iccpr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 2 April 2026, the Human Rights Committee (CCPR) published its Views in the communication No. 3742/2020 submitted by Gentilmen Issa Magumba against the Republic of Korea, concerning the refusal to process an asylum application lodged in an airport...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:48:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU: Scope of border procedures and detention of asylum applicants in facilities located within national territory  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/cjeu-scope-of-border-procedures-and-detention-of-asylum-applicants-in-facilities-located-within-national-territory" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-scope-of-border-procedures-and-detention-of-asylum-applicants-in-facilities-located-within-national-territory</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 16 April 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in joined Cases C‑50/24 to C‑56/24 (Danané and Others), originating from a request for a preliminary ruling by the Belgian Council for asylum and immigration p...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:45:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR: Failure to provide reception conditions to asylum applicants in Belgium amounts to the violation of Articles 3, 6 §1 and 34 ECHR]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/news/ecthr-failure-to-provide-reception-conditions-to-asylum-applicants-in-belgium-amounts-to-the-violation-of-articles-3-6-1-and-34-echr" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-failure-to-provide-reception-conditions-to-asylum-applicants-in-belgium-amounts-to-the-violation-of-articles-3-6-1-and-34-echr</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[On 9 April 2026, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in M.V. and Others v. Belgium (Applications nos. 52836/22 and three others). The case concerned the failure of the Belgian authorities to provide...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T18:42:38+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
