<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/ecrthr</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/ecrthr" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[ECtHR Cases]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>ECtHR Cases published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-04-03T11:33:02+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.D. and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 71321/17 and 9 others, 14 September 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[To determine whether there is a violation of Articles 2 and 3 ECHR in the context of expulsion, the Court analyses if the Applicant has presented substantial grounds on (i) whether he faces a real risk of ill-treatment or death in the country of dest...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-03T11:33:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Unuane v. The United Kingdom, Application no. 80343/17, 24 November 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-unuane-v-the-united-kingdom-application-no-8034317-24-november-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-unuane-v-the-united-kingdom-application-no-8034317-24-november-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The automatic application of domestic provisions regulating expulsion following a criminal conviction may amount to a violation of Article 8 where the impact of the removal measure on the family and isses of proportionality are not sufficiently asses...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – V.C.L. and A.N. v. The United Kingdom, Applications nos. 77587/12 and 74603/12, 16 February 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-fourthsection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-fourthsection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 4 ECHR requires that victims of trafficking are promptly identified as soon as there is credible suspicion of trafficking-related circumstances, regardless of whether the victims were able to identify and mention their experience.To the exten...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – R.R. and others v. Hungary, Application no. 36037/17, 2 March 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-rr-and-others-v-hungary-application-no-3603717-2-march-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-rr-and-others-v-hungary-application-no-3603717-2-march-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The absence of food provision raised an issue of Article 3 in respect of the first applicant, given his state of total dependency on the Hungarian government during his stay at the Röszke transit zone. The physical conditions of the container in whic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.A. and Others v. Bulgaria, Application no. 5115/18, 20 February 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-and-others-v-bulgaria-application-no-511518-20-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-and-others-v-bulgaria-application-no-511518-20-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The fact that many Uighurs who have returned to China have been detained in “re-education camps”, or have otherwise faced the risk of imprisonment and ill-treatment, combined with the applicants’ individual circumstances, establishes substantial grou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.S.N. and others v. the Netherlands, Application nos. 68377/17 and 530/18, 25 February 2020.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-asn-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-nos-6837717-and-53018-25-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-asn-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-nos-6837717-and-53018-25-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the removal of families belonging to the Sikh religious minority to Afghanistan would not constitute a violation of Article 3 ECHR, as the applicants’ situation failed to reach the severity threshold requ...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Feilazoo v. Malta, Application no. 6865/19, 11 March 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-european-court-of-human-rights-first-section" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-european-court-of-human-rights-first-section</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The conditions of detention amounted to a violation of Article 3, in so far as the applicant remained in isolation, in a container with inadequate natural light and ventilation, for a significant amount of time and without any consideration of altern...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - M.S. v. Slovakia and Ukraine, Application no. 17189/11, 11 June 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ms-v-slovakia-and-ukraine-application-no-1718911-11-june-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ms-v-slovakia-and-ukraine-application-no-1718911-11-june-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Slovakian authorities provided information and interpretation and there are no indications that these were inadequate to the extent of impairing the individual’s access to asylum. The applicant’s return to Ukraine was conducted in the context of a re...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – G.B. and others v. Turkey, 17 October 2019 No. 4633/15]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-gb-and-others-v-turkey-17-october-2019-no-463315" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-gb-and-others-v-turkey-17-october-2019-no-463315</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court ruled that the material conditions of detention exceeded Article 3 ECHR threshold and that the detention of children in such conditions, even for short periods, is also contrary to that Article. It also held that the complaint procedures th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Nur and Others v Ukraine, Application no. 77647/11, 16 July 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-nur-and-others-v-ukraine-application-no-7764711-16-july-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-nur-and-others-v-ukraine-application-no-7764711-16-july-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decided that the applicants’ arrest and detention were unlawful under Article 5 of the Convention. The eighth applicant’s complaint under Article 3 that she, a minor at the time, was not provided with adequate care in detention in connectio...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - S.A v. The Netherlands, Application n° 49773/15, 2 June 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-sa-v-the-netherlands-application-n-4977315-2-june-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-sa-v-the-netherlands-application-n-4977315-2-june-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[National authorities are best placed to assess the credibility of asylum claimants.The ill-treatment of people of non-Arab ethnic origin in Sudan is not systematic. Therefore, when the personal circumstances of an applicant that may create a risk of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - N.A. v Finland - Application no. 25244/18]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-european-court-of-human-rights" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-european-court-of-human-rights</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant’s complaint is based on the allegation that her father had not left Finland voluntarily but had been forced to return to Iraq because of the decisions already taken by the Finnish authorities. Those decisions, therefore, engaged the res...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Asady and others v. Slovakia, Application no. 24917/15, 24 March 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-asady-and-others-v-slovakia-application-no-2491715-24-march-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-asady-and-others-v-slovakia-application-no-2491715-24-march-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The standardised nature of the questions to the applicants and similarities in the responses recorded do not necessarily indicate a lack of individualised assessment. The applicants were not deprived of an opportunity to submit arguments against thei...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.N. and others v. Belgium, Application no. 3599/18, 5 May 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-mn-and-others-v-belgium-application-no-359918-5-may-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-mn-and-others-v-belgium-application-no-359918-5-may-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Not all cases with an international element can establish jurisdiction under the Convention; an assessment of exceptional circumstances on the basis of the specific facts of each case is required.The applicants do not have any connecting links with B...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Sh.D. and others v. Greece, Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Northern Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia (no.  141165/16)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-shd-and-others-v-greece-austria-croatia-hungary-northern-macedonia-serbia-and-slovenia-no-14116516-12055" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-shd-and-others-v-greece-austria-croatia-hungary-northern-macedonia-serbia-and-slovenia-no-14116516-12055</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Conditions in police stations do not justify prolonged detention, while the child’s extreme vulnerability should prevail over irregular status with necessary measures adopted to protect them. Domestic authorities had not done all that could reasonabl...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Haghilo v. Cyprus, Application No. 47920/12, 26 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-haghilo-v-cyprus-application-no-4792012-26-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-haghilo-v-cyprus-application-no-4792012-26-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Detention in police stations, places that by their very nature are designed to accommodate people for very short durations, may amount to degrading and inhuman conditions under Art. 3 ECHR if protracted for a long time.Detention of a person with a vi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - I.M. v. Switzerland, 9 April 2019, Application No. 23887/16]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-im-v-switzerland-9-april-2019-application-no-2388716" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-im-v-switzerland-9-april-2019-application-no-2388716</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[It is necessary to make a proportionality assessment with consideration of both the gravity of the crime committed by the applicant and the interests of society, and the applicant’s individual rights, particularly his right to private and family life...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Z.A. and Others v. Russia, Applications nos. 61411/15, 61420/15, 61427/15 and 3028/16, 21 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-za-and-others-v-russia-applications-nos-6141115-6142015-6142715-and-302816-21-november-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-za-and-others-v-russia-applications-nos-6141115-6142015-6142715-and-302816-21-november-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Confinement of asylum applicants in an airport transit zone is contrary to Art. 5 § 1 (f) in the absence of any domestic legal basis for the applicants’ deprivation of liberty.Confinement of asylum seekers left to their own devices in airport transit...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, 13 February 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-nd-and-nt-v-spain-gc-nos-867515-and-869715-13-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-nd-and-nt-v-spain-gc-nos-867515-and-869715-13-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found no violation of the Convention given that the applicants would have had access to a genuine and effective possibility of submitting arguments against their expulsion had  they entered lawfully into Spain – they did not have any “cogen...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, H.A. and others v. Greece, 19951/16, 28 February 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ha-and-others-v-greece-1995116-28-february-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ha-and-others-v-greece-1995116-28-february-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The detention conditions, to which the applicants had been subjected to in police stations, while being under protective custody as unaccompanied minors, violated Article 3 ECHR.  Violation of Article 3 in conjunction with Article 13 on account of th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Case of A.S. v France, 19 July 2018, Application No. 46240/15]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-case-of-as-v-france-19-july-2018-application-no-4624015" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-case-of-as-v-france-19-july-2018-application-no-4624015</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[After being notified of his return decision, set to take place on the same day, the applicant requested an interim measure on Article 3 ECHR grounds in the morning but was nonetheless expelled to Morocco in the afternoon. The Court found no violation...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[K.G. v. Belgium (No. 52548/15), 6 November 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/kg-v-belgium-no-5254815-6-november-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/kg-v-belgium-no-5254815-6-november-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Belgian authorities carried out a reasonable assessment, balancing the risk to public safety with the applicant’s mental health, in deciding the applicant’s detention. The duration and medical care provided in detention were lawful and justified.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, M.A. v. France (No. 9373/15) 2 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-v-france-no-937315-2-july-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-v-france-no-937315-2-july-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant, an Algerian national convicted in France for terrorism and banned from entering French territory in 2006, was sent back to Algeria in 2014, on the day he was notified of the rejection of his asylum claim and of the issuance of his retu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[I.K. v. Switzerland (No. 21417/17), 18 January 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ik-v-switzerland-no-2141717-18-january-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ik-v-switzerland-no-2141717-18-january-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant, a national from Sierra Leone who claimed asylum in Switzerland on the grounds of persecution owing to his homosexuality, is found not to be at risk of treatment prohibited under Article 3 of the Convention in case of return to his coun...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[A.N. and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 61689/16 and 3 others]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/an-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-6168916-and-3-others" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/an-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-6168916-and-3-others</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Russia had failed to substantially and effectively examine the repeated claims of the applicants that their extradition would constitute a violation of Article 3 ECHR. Given the current situation in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan and the individual circum...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[N.T.P. and others v. France (No. 68862/13), 24 August 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ntp-and-others-v-france-no-6886213-24-august-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ntp-and-others-v-france-no-6886213-24-august-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court examines the individuals’ circumstances and finds that the appointment with the French authorities to register and assess their asylum cases within a three-month period, coupled with the possibility for the applicants to stay in a foster ho...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, Bilalova and others v. Poland, Application no. 23685/14, 26 March 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bilalova-and-others-v-poland-application-no-2368514-26-march-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bilalova-and-others-v-poland-application-no-2368514-26-march-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The detention of children is, in principle, permitted under Article 5 ECHR for the shortest amount of time, in appropriate conditions and facilities, and only after the Government has correctly concluded that less coercive measures are unavailable.Th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (GC), no. 16483/12, 15 December 2016]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-khlaifia-and-others-v-italy-gc-no-1648312-15-december-2016" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-khlaifia-and-others-v-italy-gc-no-1648312-15-december-2016</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicants’ detention under Article 5 (1) was arbitrary and did not ensure the principle of legal certainty; lack of information was contrary to Article 5 (2) and impaired their ability to challenge the detention decisions in violation of 5 (4)....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Al Husin v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (No. 2) (no. 10112/16)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-al-husin-v-bosnia-and-herzegovina-no-2-no-1011216" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-al-husin-v-bosnia-and-herzegovina-no-2-no-1011216</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Detention within the context of immigration must be lawful, not arbitrary and carried out in good faith. In this sense, the depriavation of liberty without a realistic prospect of removal is against the prevision of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Sh.D. and others v. Greece, Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Northern Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia (no.  141165/16)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-shd-and-others-v-greece-austria-croatia-hungary-northern-macedonia-serbia-and-slovenia-no-14116516" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-shd-and-others-v-greece-austria-croatia-hungary-northern-macedonia-serbia-and-slovenia-no-14116516</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Detention conditions in Greek police stations and living conditions in Idomeni Camp in northern Greece for five unaccompanied children were in breach of Article 3 of the Convention. A further violation was found in respect of Article 5 § 1 regarding...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – G.S. v. Bulgaria (no. 36538/17), 4 April 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-gs-v-bulgaria-no-3653817-4-april-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-gs-v-bulgaria-no-3653817-4-april-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Extradition to Iran to face criminal charges would risk a violation of Article 3 due to possible exposure to flogging under Iranian penal law. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - X v. The Netherlands, Application no. 14319/17, 10 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-x-v-the-netherlands-application-no-1431917-10-july-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-x-v-the-netherlands-application-no-1431917-10-july-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 3 has not been violated in a case concerning the deportation of an individual who had been convicted of a terrorism-related charge to Morocco. However the ECtHR acknowledges that ill-treatment and torture by the police and the security forces...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Gaspar v Russia, Application no. 23038/15, 12 June 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-gaspar-v-russia-application-no-2303815-12-june-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-gaspar-v-russia-application-no-2303815-12-june-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The European Court of Human Rights finds Russian authorities violated an American national’s Article 8 right to respect for family life, as it had compelled her to leave Russia, where her husband and minor child were living.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Ljatifi v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Application nos. 16870/11, 16874/11 and 16879/11), 17 May 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ljatifi-v-the-former-yugoslav-republic-of-macedonia-application-nos-1687011-1687411-and-1687911-17-may-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ljatifi-v-the-former-yugoslav-republic-of-macedonia-application-nos-1687011-1687411-and-1687911-17-may-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court ruled that, even where national security was at stake, deportation measures should be subject to some form of adversarial proceedings before an independent authority or court. In this case, the Macedonian courts failed to scrutinise whether...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Kahadawa Arachchige and Others v. Cyprus (Application nos. 16870/11, 16874/11 and 16879/11), 19 June 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-kahadawa-arachchige-and-others-v-cyprus-application-nos-1687011-1687411-and-1687911-19-june-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-kahadawa-arachchige-and-others-v-cyprus-application-nos-1687011-1687411-and-1687911-19-june-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The detention of three Sri Lankan nationals on grounds of public order before their removal from Cyprus was found to be lawful by the Court. However, the Court found that the applicants did not have at their disposal an effective remedy by which they...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary, Application No. 47287/15, 21 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ilias-and-ahmed-v-hungary-application-no-4728715-21-november-2019-11918" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ilias-and-ahmed-v-hungary-application-no-4728715-21-november-2019-11918</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When State Parties do not examine an application for international protection in its mertis based on a safe third country clause, Article 3 still requires that they apply a thorough and comprehensive legal procedure to assess the existence of such ri...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Saber and Boughassal v. Spain, Applications 76550/13 and 45938/14, 18 December 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/saber-and-boughassal-v-spain-applications-7655013-and-4593814-18-december-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/saber-and-boughassal-v-spain-applications-7655013-and-4593814-18-december-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Spanish authorities failed to properly consider all the relevant criteria, before initiating proceedings to expel two Moroccan nationals, who were awaiting their long-term residence permits, due to their criminal convictions. The proportionality...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Hoti v. Croatia (no. 63311/14)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-hoti-v-croatia-no-6331114" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-hoti-v-croatia-no-6331114</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The restriction of the right to reside in a country may entail a violation of Article 8 ECHR, when creating disproportionate effects on the individuals’ private life. States should provide effective and accessible means to protect the right to respec...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR Khaksar v. the United Kingdom (no. 2654/18)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-khaksar-v-the-united-kingdom-no-265418" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-khaksar-v-the-united-kingdom-no-265418</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The exhaustion of domestic remedies is a prerequisite for the admissibility of applications lodged with the ECtHR under Article 35 ECHR. Removal of individuals suffering from severe medical problems may not be considered inhumane in the meaning of Ar...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR Krasniqi v. Austria (no. 41697/12)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-krasniqi-v-austria-no-4169712" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-krasniqi-v-austria-no-4169712</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Every country has the right to control the entry and residence of aliens in its territory. Withdrawal of subsidiary protection from individuals convicted of serious crimes and subsequent expulsion does not violate their right to family life under Art...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR T.M and Others v. Russia (no. 31189/15 and 5 others)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-tm-and-others-v-russia-no-3118915-and-5-others" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-tm-and-others-v-russia-no-3118915-and-5-others</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Prospective extradition of Applicants, members of an established vulnerable group under ECtHR, to a country where the risk of ill-treatment is real shall trigger a violation of Article 3 ECHR. Detention orders not meeting Article 5§1(f) ECHR objectiv...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR Thuo v. Cyprus (no. 3869/07)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-thuo-v-cyprus-no-386907" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-thuo-v-cyprus-no-386907</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Lack of prompt investigation of ill-treatment complaints may amount to a procedural violation of Article 3 ECHR. Detention conditions should follow certain standards and individuals should be kept in suitable establishments with enough allocated spac...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Bistieva and Others v. Poland, Application No. 75157/14, Judgement of 10 April 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bistieva-and-others-v-poland-application-no-7515714-judgement-of-10-april-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bistieva-and-others-v-poland-application-no-7515714-judgement-of-10-april-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The ECtHR held that the detention for almost six months of a Russian national and her three children in a detention centre in Poland amounted to a violation of Article 8, as even in the light of the risk that the family might abscond, the authorities...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - M.A. and Others v. Lithuania (no. 59793/17), 11 December 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-and-others-v-lithuania-no-5979317-11-december-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-and-others-v-lithuania-no-5979317-11-december-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The ECtHR ruled that failure to allow a Russian family with five children to submit asylum applications on the Lithuanian border and their removal to Belarus amounted to a violation of Article 3 ECHR. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Khanh v Cyprus (Application no. 43639/12), 4 December 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-khanh-v-cyprus-application-no-4363912-4-december-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-khanh-v-cyprus-application-no-4363912-4-december-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The ECtHR ruled the conditions of the applicant’s detention, prior to her being deported from Cyprus, subjected her to hardship going beyond the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and thus amounted to degrading treatment prohibited...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – El Ghatet v. Switzerland, Application No. 56971/10, 8 November 2016]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-el-ghatet-v-switzerland-application-no-5697110-8-november-2016" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-el-ghatet-v-switzerland-application-no-5697110-8-november-2016</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicants are seeking damages on the basis of a violation of article 8 ECHR in respect of the refusal of the Swiss authorities to permit the family reunification of an Egyptian son with his father, who has Egyptian and Swiss nationality.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Khan v. France (no. 12267/16), 28 February 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-khan-v-france-no-1226716-28-february-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-khan-v-france-no-1226716-28-february-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The precarious living conditions in Calais and the failure of the French authorities to comply with judicial orders to protect the applicant, in view of his personal circumstances and young age, reach the threshold for a breach of Article 3.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Amadou v Greece, Application No. 37991/11, 4 February 2016]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-amadou-v-greece-application-no-3799111-4-february-2016" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-amadou-v-greece-application-no-3799111-4-february-2016</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found a violation of Articles 3 and 5(4) ECHR in relation to the Applicant’s detention conditions at Fylakio and Aspropyrgos, and the shortcomings of domestic law in relation to the judicial review of his detention. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – R.V. v France, Application No. 78514/14, 7 July 2016]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-rv-v-france-application-no-7851414-7-july-2016" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-rv-v-france-application-no-7851414-7-july-2016</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant appealed against a deportation order on account of the high risk that he faced of being subject to treatment contrary to Article 3 ECHR in the case of return to Russia.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Richmond Yaw and others v. Italy, Application nos. 3342/11, 3391/11, 3408/11 and 3447/11, 6 October 2016]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-richmond-yaw-and-others-v-italy-application-nos-334211-339111-340811-and-344711-6-october-2016" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-richmond-yaw-and-others-v-italy-application-nos-334211-339111-340811-and-344711-6-october-2016</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[This case concerned the detention of four applicants from Ghana in Italy. The basis of the claim was a violation of Article 5(1) ECHR.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:44+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
