<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/ecrthr</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/ecrthr" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[ECtHR Cases]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>ECtHR Cases published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-10-09T15:26:55+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.A. v. Sweden, Application No. 4677/20, 13/07/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-aa-v-sweden-application-no-467720-13072023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-aa-v-sweden-application-no-467720-13072023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An applicant will not be subject to risk of ill treatment under Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR, either because of the general security situation in Libya or the applicant’s previous work affiliated with the Gaddafi regime. The Court found that the situ...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T09:04:09+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - S.E. v. Serbia, Application No. 61365/16, 11/07/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-se-v-serbia-application-no-6136516-11072023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-se-v-serbia-application-no-6136516-11072023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Serbia, by refusing to issue the refugee applicant a travel document due to the absence of appropriate regulations, breached Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4 of the ECHR]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T08:04:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.R.E. v. Greece, Application No. 15783/21, 07/01/2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-are-v-greece-application-no-1578321-07012025" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-are-v-greece-application-no-1578321-07012025</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Regarding the return of a Turkish applicant from Greece to Türkiye, her account constituted a prima facie case of refoulement, shifting the burden of proof to the Greek Government after evidentiary standards from secret detention cases were applied....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:54:05+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Dabo v. Sweden, Application No. 12510/18, 18/01/2024]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-dabo-v-sweden-application-no-1251018-18012024" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-dabo-v-sweden-application-no-1251018-18012024</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found no violation of Article 8 ECHR took place as the requirements set out by the Swedish Temporary Restrictions Act were in line with the Family Reunification Directive and the European consensus. The balancing exercise was therefore perf...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:18:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - B.Ü. v. the Czech Republic, Application No. 9264/15, 06/10/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bu-v-the-czech-republic-application-no-926415-06102022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bu-v-the-czech-republic-application-no-926415-06102022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Complaint under Article 3 ECHR concerning the conditions of detention of a Turkish national in the Czech Bělá-Jezová detention centre declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. Failure to conduct an independent, thorough and victi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:07:58+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.M.A. v. the Netherlands, Application No. 23048/19, 24/10/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ama-v-the-netherlands-application-no-2304819-24102023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ama-v-the-netherlands-application-no-2304819-24102023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[States have a rigorous procedural obligation under Article 3 ECHR when assessing the risk of ill-treatment in a last minute asylum application submitted shortly before removal. Even where a subsequent application is made at a very late stage, domesti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T14:38:16+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - B.F. and Others v. Switzerland, Applications Nos. 13258/18, 15500/18, 57303/18 and 9078/20, 04/07/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bf-and-others-v-switzerland-applications-nos-1325818-1550018-5730318-and-907820-04072023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bf-and-others-v-switzerland-applications-nos-1325818-1550018-5730318-and-907820-04072023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that the Swiss legislation sets stringent socio-economic requirements which in practice may render the right to family reunification impossible to exercise, in view of the personal situation of the sponsors residing in Switzerland and...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-08T12:10:15+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Al Alo v. Slovakia, Application No. 32084/19, 10/02/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-al-alo-v-slovakia-application-no-3208419-10022022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-al-alo-v-slovakia-application-no-3208419-10022022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that there was a breach of Article 6(1) and (3)(d) of the Convention. The Court clarified that for a waiver of one’s rights to be compatible with the Convention, it must be shown that the applicant could reasonably have foreseen the c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:20:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Zoletic and Others v. Azerbaijan, Application No. 20116/12, 07/10/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-zoletic-and-others-v-azerbaijan-application-no-2011612-07102021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-zoletic-and-others-v-azerbaijan-application-no-2011612-07102021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Even in the absence of a formal complaint, the repeated notifications of trafficking elements to authorities and broader awareness of migrant worker abuse reported in international resources (ECRI, GRETA reports) triggered a duty to investigate. Howe...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T15:54:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Poklikayew v. Poland, Application No. 1103/16, 22/06/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-poklikayew-v-poland-application-no-110316-22062023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-poklikayew-v-poland-application-no-110316-22062023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case raises an issue under Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention and concerns the expulsion of the applicant (a lawfully resident alien) on the grounds of national security. The applicant complained that the reasons for the revocation of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-08T12:29:40+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Alhowais v. Hungary, Application No. 59435/17, 02/02/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-alhowais-v-hungary-application-no-5943517-02022023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-alhowais-v-hungary-application-no-5943517-02022023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found Hungary in violation of procedural aspects of Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR, as well as a substantive violation of Article 2 in relation to the death of the applicant’s brother during a border control operation. The Court rejected the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-08T13:05:01+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Muhammad Saqawat v. Belgium, Application no. 54962/18, 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-affaire-muhammad-saqawat-v-belgium-application-no-5496218-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-affaire-muhammad-saqawat-v-belgium-application-no-5496218-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The situation in which an appeal by a foreigner against a detention decision is declared ‘without object’, solely on the ground that a new detention order has been issued, does not offer the guarantees of effectiveness and promptness required by arti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-18T07:40:28+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - M.A. v. Denmark, Application no. 6697/18, 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-v-denmark-application-no-669718-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-v-denmark-application-no-669718-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Except for very limited exceptions, the statutory three-year waiting period for family reunification of persons granted ‘temporary protection’ does not allow for an individualised assessment of the interest of family unity in light of the concrete si...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-16T14:41:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, J.B. v. Greece, Application no.  54796/16, 26 May 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/jb-v-greece-application-no-5479616-26-may-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/jb-v-greece-application-no-5479616-26-may-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerns the potential removal of a Syrian national of Armenian origin and Christian denomination from Greece to Türkiye under the EU-Türkiye Statement of 18 March 2026, following the rejection of his asylum claim on safe third country groun...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-09T14:56:03+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, Y.F.C. and Others v. The Netherlands, Application no. 21325/19, 21 April 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/yfc-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-no-application-no-2132519-21-april-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/yfc-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-no-application-no-2132519-21-april-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerns seven Venezuelan nationals who arrived in Curaçao in April 2019 and were placed in immigration detention following refusal of entry and removal orders. The Court found a violation of Article 3 ECHR in relation to the use of force du...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-09T15:26:55+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[European Court of Human Rights, A.A. v. Switzerland, 5 November 2019, n°32218/17]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-aa-v-switzerland-5-november-2019-n3221817" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-aa-v-switzerland-5-november-2019-n3221817</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When a national authority assesses the likely persecution of an applicant for religious purposes in case of return to his/her country of origin, the national authority must evaluate, inter allia, the way the applicant will live his/her faith in his/h...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:41:27+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Z and others v. Finland, Application no 42758/23, 16 December 2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-european-court-of-human-rights-second-section" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-european-court-of-human-rights-second-section</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Violation of Article 8 regarding the right to respect for family life, arising from a domestic court order for the return of two children from Finland to Russia under the Hague Child Abduction Convention. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:32:03+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[SAVRAN v. DENMARK (Application no. 57467/15)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/savran-v-denmark-application-no-5746715" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/savran-v-denmark-application-no-5746715</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The current case concerns the expulsion of Mr. Arif Savran “the applicant” from Denmark to his country of origin, Turkey in 2015 because of his criminal convictions in Denmark. The applicant argued that his expulsion to Turkey had been in violation o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-17T14:31:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ABDI v. DENMARK (Application no. 41643/19)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/abdi-v-denmark-application-no-4164319" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/abdi-v-denmark-application-no-4164319</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The expulsion of the applicant to Somalia was in violation of Article 8 of the Convention, because the offences committed by the applicant did not posed a threat to public order and he had not previously been warned of expulsion or had a conditional...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-17T13:54:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Muqishta v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Application no. 27994/19, 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-fourth-session" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-fourth-session</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that the Bosnian administrative authorities unlawfully disregarded the legal provisions pursuant to which the applicant was entitled to other, similar benefits, despite the fact that she specifically invoked those provisions in her...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T12:59:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[M.H. and Others v. Croatia, Application no.15670/18 and 43115/18]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-first-session" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-first-session</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that there was a violation of Article 2 of the ECHR as State authorities used unreliable evidence to conclude their investigation into the death of an applicant. Moreover, the Court concluded that the State authorities violated Articl...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T11:57:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, J.B. and others v Malta, Application no. 1766/23, 22 October 2024]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-jb-and-others-v-malta-application-no-176623-22-october-2024" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-jb-and-others-v-malta-application-no-176623-22-october-2024</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court ruled that Malta violated Article 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention given the fact that the applicants, who were minors, endured inhumane detention conditions, lacked an effective remedy to challenge their detention, and faced unlawful deprivat...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T15:46:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.D. and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 71321/17 and 9 others, 14 September 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[To determine whether there is a violation of Articles 2 and 3 ECHR in the context of expulsion, the Court analyses if the Applicant has presented substantial grounds on (i) whether he faces a real risk of ill-treatment or death in the country of dest...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-03T11:33:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Unuane v. The United Kingdom, Application no. 80343/17, 24 November 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-unuane-v-the-united-kingdom-application-no-8034317-24-november-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-unuane-v-the-united-kingdom-application-no-8034317-24-november-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The automatic application of domestic provisions regulating expulsion following a criminal conviction may amount to a violation of Article 8 where the impact of the removal measure on the family and isses of proportionality are not sufficiently asses...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – V.C.L. and A.N. v. The United Kingdom, Applications nos. 77587/12 and 74603/12, 16 February 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-fourthsection" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-fourthsection</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 4 ECHR requires that victims of trafficking are promptly identified as soon as there is credible suspicion of trafficking-related circumstances, regardless of whether the victims were able to identify and mention their experience.To the exten...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – R.R. and others v. Hungary, Application no. 36037/17, 2 March 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-rr-and-others-v-hungary-application-no-3603717-2-march-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-rr-and-others-v-hungary-application-no-3603717-2-march-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The absence of food provision raised an issue of Article 3 in respect of the first applicant, given his state of total dependency on the Hungarian government during his stay at the Röszke transit zone. The physical conditions of the container in whic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.A. and Others v. Bulgaria, Application no. 5115/18, 20 February 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-and-others-v-bulgaria-application-no-511518-20-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-and-others-v-bulgaria-application-no-511518-20-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The fact that many Uighurs who have returned to China have been detained in “re-education camps”, or have otherwise faced the risk of imprisonment and ill-treatment, combined with the applicants’ individual circumstances, establishes substantial grou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.S.N. and others v. the Netherlands, Application nos. 68377/17 and 530/18, 25 February 2020.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-asn-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-nos-6837717-and-53018-25-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-asn-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-nos-6837717-and-53018-25-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The European Court of Human Rights ruled that the removal of families belonging to the Sikh religious minority to Afghanistan would not constitute a violation of Article 3 ECHR, as the applicants’ situation failed to reach the severity threshold requ...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Feilazoo v. Malta, Application no. 6865/19, 11 March 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-european-court-of-human-rights-first-section" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-european-court-of-human-rights-first-section</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The conditions of detention amounted to a violation of Article 3, in so far as the applicant remained in isolation, in a container with inadequate natural light and ventilation, for a significant amount of time and without any consideration of altern...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - M.S. v. Slovakia and Ukraine, Application no. 17189/11, 11 June 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ms-v-slovakia-and-ukraine-application-no-1718911-11-june-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ms-v-slovakia-and-ukraine-application-no-1718911-11-june-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Slovakian authorities provided information and interpretation and there are no indications that these were inadequate to the extent of impairing the individual’s access to asylum. The applicant’s return to Ukraine was conducted in the context of a re...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – G.B. and others v. Turkey, 17 October 2019 No. 4633/15]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-gb-and-others-v-turkey-17-october-2019-no-463315" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-gb-and-others-v-turkey-17-october-2019-no-463315</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court ruled that the material conditions of detention exceeded Article 3 ECHR threshold and that the detention of children in such conditions, even for short periods, is also contrary to that Article. It also held that the complaint procedures th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Nur and Others v Ukraine, Application no. 77647/11, 16 July 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-nur-and-others-v-ukraine-application-no-7764711-16-july-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-nur-and-others-v-ukraine-application-no-7764711-16-july-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decided that the applicants’ arrest and detention were unlawful under Article 5 of the Convention. The eighth applicant’s complaint under Article 3 that she, a minor at the time, was not provided with adequate care in detention in connectio...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - S.A v. The Netherlands, Application n° 49773/15, 2 June 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-sa-v-the-netherlands-application-n-4977315-2-june-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-sa-v-the-netherlands-application-n-4977315-2-june-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[National authorities are best placed to assess the credibility of asylum claimants.The ill-treatment of people of non-Arab ethnic origin in Sudan is not systematic. Therefore, when the personal circumstances of an applicant that may create a risk of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - N.A. v Finland - Application no. 25244/18]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-european-court-of-human-rights" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-european-court-of-human-rights</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant’s complaint is based on the allegation that her father had not left Finland voluntarily but had been forced to return to Iraq because of the decisions already taken by the Finnish authorities. Those decisions, therefore, engaged the res...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Asady and others v. Slovakia, Application no. 24917/15, 24 March 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-asady-and-others-v-slovakia-application-no-2491715-24-march-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-asady-and-others-v-slovakia-application-no-2491715-24-march-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The standardised nature of the questions to the applicants and similarities in the responses recorded do not necessarily indicate a lack of individualised assessment. The applicants were not deprived of an opportunity to submit arguments against thei...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.N. and others v. Belgium, Application no. 3599/18, 5 May 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-mn-and-others-v-belgium-application-no-359918-5-may-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-mn-and-others-v-belgium-application-no-359918-5-may-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Not all cases with an international element can establish jurisdiction under the Convention; an assessment of exceptional circumstances on the basis of the specific facts of each case is required.The applicants do not have any connecting links with B...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Sh.D. and others v. Greece, Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Northern Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia (no.  141165/16)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-shd-and-others-v-greece-austria-croatia-hungary-northern-macedonia-serbia-and-slovenia-no-14116516-12055" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-shd-and-others-v-greece-austria-croatia-hungary-northern-macedonia-serbia-and-slovenia-no-14116516-12055</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Conditions in police stations do not justify prolonged detention, while the child’s extreme vulnerability should prevail over irregular status with necessary measures adopted to protect them. Domestic authorities had not done all that could reasonabl...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Haghilo v. Cyprus, Application No. 47920/12, 26 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-haghilo-v-cyprus-application-no-4792012-26-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-haghilo-v-cyprus-application-no-4792012-26-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Detention in police stations, places that by their very nature are designed to accommodate people for very short durations, may amount to degrading and inhuman conditions under Art. 3 ECHR if protracted for a long time.Detention of a person with a vi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - I.M. v. Switzerland, 9 April 2019, Application No. 23887/16]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-im-v-switzerland-9-april-2019-application-no-2388716" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-im-v-switzerland-9-april-2019-application-no-2388716</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[It is necessary to make a proportionality assessment with consideration of both the gravity of the crime committed by the applicant and the interests of society, and the applicant’s individual rights, particularly his right to private and family life...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Z.A. and Others v. Russia, Applications nos. 61411/15, 61420/15, 61427/15 and 3028/16, 21 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-za-and-others-v-russia-applications-nos-6141115-6142015-6142715-and-302816-21-november-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-za-and-others-v-russia-applications-nos-6141115-6142015-6142715-and-302816-21-november-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Confinement of asylum applicants in an airport transit zone is contrary to Art. 5 § 1 (f) in the absence of any domestic legal basis for the applicants’ deprivation of liberty.Confinement of asylum seekers left to their own devices in airport transit...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, 13 February 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-nd-and-nt-v-spain-gc-nos-867515-and-869715-13-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-nd-and-nt-v-spain-gc-nos-867515-and-869715-13-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found no violation of the Convention given that the applicants would have had access to a genuine and effective possibility of submitting arguments against their expulsion had  they entered lawfully into Spain – they did not have any “cogen...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, H.A. and others v. Greece, 19951/16, 28 February 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ha-and-others-v-greece-1995116-28-february-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ha-and-others-v-greece-1995116-28-february-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The detention conditions, to which the applicants had been subjected to in police stations, while being under protective custody as unaccompanied minors, violated Article 3 ECHR.  Violation of Article 3 in conjunction with Article 13 on account of th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – Case of A.S. v France, 19 July 2018, Application No. 46240/15]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-case-of-as-v-france-19-july-2018-application-no-4624015" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-case-of-as-v-france-19-july-2018-application-no-4624015</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[After being notified of his return decision, set to take place on the same day, the applicant requested an interim measure on Article 3 ECHR grounds in the morning but was nonetheless expelled to Morocco in the afternoon. The Court found no violation...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[K.G. v. Belgium (No. 52548/15), 6 November 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/kg-v-belgium-no-5254815-6-november-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/kg-v-belgium-no-5254815-6-november-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Belgian authorities carried out a reasonable assessment, balancing the risk to public safety with the applicant’s mental health, in deciding the applicant’s detention. The duration and medical care provided in detention were lawful and justified.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, M.A. v. France (No. 9373/15) 2 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-v-france-no-937315-2-july-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-v-france-no-937315-2-july-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant, an Algerian national convicted in France for terrorism and banned from entering French territory in 2006, was sent back to Algeria in 2014, on the day he was notified of the rejection of his asylum claim and of the issuance of his retu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[I.K. v. Switzerland (No. 21417/17), 18 January 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ik-v-switzerland-no-2141717-18-january-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ik-v-switzerland-no-2141717-18-january-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicant, a national from Sierra Leone who claimed asylum in Switzerland on the grounds of persecution owing to his homosexuality, is found not to be at risk of treatment prohibited under Article 3 of the Convention in case of return to his coun...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[A.N. and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 61689/16 and 3 others]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/an-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-6168916-and-3-others" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/an-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-6168916-and-3-others</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Russia had failed to substantially and effectively examine the repeated claims of the applicants that their extradition would constitute a violation of Article 3 ECHR. Given the current situation in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan and the individual circum...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[N.T.P. and others v. France (No. 68862/13), 24 August 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ntp-and-others-v-france-no-6886213-24-august-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ntp-and-others-v-france-no-6886213-24-august-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court examines the individuals’ circumstances and finds that the appointment with the French authorities to register and assess their asylum cases within a three-month period, coupled with the possibility for the applicants to stay in a foster ho...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, Bilalova and others v. Poland, Application no. 23685/14, 26 March 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bilalova-and-others-v-poland-application-no-2368514-26-march-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bilalova-and-others-v-poland-application-no-2368514-26-march-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The detention of children is, in principle, permitted under Article 5 ECHR for the shortest amount of time, in appropriate conditions and facilities, and only after the Government has correctly concluded that less coercive measures are unavailable.Th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (GC), no. 16483/12, 15 December 2016]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-khlaifia-and-others-v-italy-gc-no-1648312-15-december-2016" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-khlaifia-and-others-v-italy-gc-no-1648312-15-december-2016</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The applicants’ detention under Article 5 (1) was arbitrary and did not ensure the principle of legal certainty; lack of information was contrary to Article 5 (2) and impaired their ability to challenge the detention decisions in violation of 5 (4)....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
