<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/cjeu</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/cjeu" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[CJEU Cases]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>CJEU Cases published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-04-01T11:32:47+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-507/19, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. XT, 13 January 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When analysing if protection from UNRWA has ceased (Article 12(1)(a) Directive 2011/95), account must be taken of the possibility for the individual to concretely access effective protection in any of the other fields within UNRWA area of operations....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T11:32:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[AS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-appeal-civil-decision" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-appeal-civil-decision</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court of Appeal set aside the Upper Tribunal’s Country Guidance on internal relocation to Kabul, on the basis that it had made a factual error, wrongly stating that civilian causalities amounted to less than 0.001 per cent, rather than less than...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C-924/19 PPU and C-925/19 PPU, FMS and Others v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság, 14 May 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-92419-ppu-and-c-92519-ppu-fms-and-others-v-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-del-alfoldi-regionalis-igazgatosag-and-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-14-may-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-92419-ppu-and-c-92519-ppu-fms-and-others-v-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-del-alfoldi-regionalis-igazgatosag-and-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-14-may-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[1. A change of the destination country in a return decision by an administrative authority should be regarded as a new return decision requiring an effective remedy in compliance with Article 47 CFREU.2. The national legislation providing for a safe...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C  213/17 (X), 5 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-21317-x-5-july-2018-12053" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-21317-x-5-july-2018-12053</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerned the application of a take back request under the the Dublin III Regulation where an asylum applicant has lodged multiple asylum applications in two different Member States and is the subject of a European Arrest Warrant.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Court of The Hague, 19 March 2018, NL 17.11921]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-the-hague-hearing-location-zwolle-ht-masmeyer" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-the-hague-hearing-location-zwolle-ht-masmeyer</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In assessing the credibility of a sexual orientation-related claim, personal circumstances have to be taken into account. That a person is not able to elaborate on his awareness and acceptance of his sexual orientation, is not sufficient to conclude...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C 180/17, X and Y, 26 September 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-18017-x-and-y-26-september-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-18017-x-and-y-26-september-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled on  the scope of the right to an effective remedy provided for in Article 46 of the (Recast) Asylum Procedures Directive and in Article 13 of the Returns Directive.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C 175/17 X, 26 September 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-17517-x-26-september-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-17517-x-26-september-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled on  the scope of the right to an effective remedy provided for in Article 39 of the Asylum Procedures Directive and in Article 13 of the Returns Directive.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C‑129/18, SM (Enfant placé sous kafala algérienne), 26 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c12918-sm-enfant-place-sous-kafala-algerienne-26-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c12918-sm-enfant-place-sous-kafala-algerienne-26-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Algerian Kafala system does not create a parent/child relationship within the meaning of direct descendant under Directive 2004/38 but it does fall under the notion of other family members of Article 3(2)(a) of the same Directive. The State must...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU  ̶  C-706/18 X v Belgium, 20 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-sixth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-sixth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The principle of effectiveness and the objectives of the Family Reunification Directive preclude domestic legislation that foresees the automatic issue of an entry and residence permit for family reunification on the sole ground that the time limit t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C‑713/17, Ayubi, 21 November 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c71317-ayubi-21-november-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c71317-ayubi-21-november-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Persons entitled to refugee protection should be accorded the same treatment regarding assistance as provided to nationals of the Member State. Article 29 Directive 2011/95 and Article 23 Geneva Convention do not make this treatment dependant on the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C‑412/17 and C‑474/17 Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Touring Tours und Travel GmbH and Sociedad de Transportes SA, 13 December 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c41217-and-c47417-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-touring-tours-und-travel-gmbh-and-sociedad-de-transportes-sa-13-december-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c41217-and-c47417-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-touring-tours-und-travel-gmbh-and-sociedad-de-transportes-sa-13-december-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A national measure requiring private coach transporters crossing internal borders to check the documents of the passengers on board and refuse the access to those not provided with passport or residence permit is prohibited under Article 21(a) of Reg...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-519/18 TB, 12 December 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-51918-tb-12-december-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-51918-tb-12-december-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 10(2) of Directive 2003/86 allows Member States to define autonomously the nature of the relationship of dependence between the sponsor and the family member not referred in art. 4, as long as the national law have regard of all the relevant...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-806/18 JZ (Peine de prison en cas d’interdiction d‘entrée), 17 September 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-eu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-eu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Return Directive does not preclude Member States from introducing legislation that imposes a custodial sentence on individuals for whom the return procedure has been exahusted but still remain in the territory, where the criminal act consists in...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C 36/20 PPU, V.L. v Spain, 25 June 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-3620-ppu-vl-v-spain-25-june-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-3620-ppu-vl-v-spain-25-june-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU found that the judge assigned to rule upon the applicant’s detention should have transmitted his request for international protection to the competent authority so it could be registered, and the applicant could enjoy his rights provided by...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-255/19 Secretary of State for the Home Department v OA, 20 January 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-25519-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-v-oa-20-january-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-25519-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-v-oa-20-january-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the context of cessation of refugee status under Article 11 (1)(e), the change in circumstances must remedy the reasons which led to the recognition of refugee status; a country of origin’s ability or inability to demonstrate that it can provide p...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU  ̶  C 380/18, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E.P., 12 December 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-38018-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-v-ep-12-december-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-38018-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-v-ep-12-december-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 6(1)(e) of the Schengen Borders Code does not preclude the issue of a return decision to a third-country national not subject to a visa requirement and who is present on the territory of a M.S. for a short stay if that national is suspected o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-353/16, MP v Secretary of State for the Home Department]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-35316-mp-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-35316-mp-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The fact that a person cannot be repatriated under Article 3 of the ECHR does not imply that that person should be granted a leave to reside in the host country by way of subsidiary protection under Directive 2004/83. The person concerned is eligible...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-673/19 M and Others (Transfert vers un État membre), 24 February 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-67319-m-and-others-transfert-vers-un-etat-membre-24-february-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-67319-m-and-others-transfert-vers-un-etat-membre-24-february-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Return Directive does not prevent a Member State from placing in administrative detention a third-country national residing illegally on its territory, in order to carry out the forced transfer of that national to another Member State in which th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C 715/17, C718/17 and C719/17 Commission v Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, 2 April 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-71517-c71817-and-c71917-commission-v-poland-hungary-and-the-czech-republic-2-april-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-71517-c71817-and-c71917-commission-v-poland-hungary-and-the-czech-republic-2-april-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States cannot merely refer to the existence of public order and security concerns under Article 72 TFEU, in order to derogate from their obligations under Title V without proving that it was necessary to do so. Such a derogation cannot be made...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-836/18 RH, 27 February 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-83618-rh-27-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-83618-rh-27-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Union citizen’s lack of sufficient resources for their family member, who is a third-country national, not to become a burden on the national social system, cannot sufficiently establish a reason to refuse a derived right of residence on the basis...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-112/20 Belgian State (Retour du parent d’un mineur), 11 March 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-tenth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-tenth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States are required to take due account of the best interests of the child before adopting a return decision accompanied by an entry ban, even where the person to whom that decision is addressed is not a minor but his or her father.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C-18/19 WM, 2 July 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-cjeu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-cjeu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[EU law does not preclude national legislation that allows an illegally staying third-country national to be detained in prison accommodation for removal, on the ground that he poses a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C 444/17, Abdelaziz Arib v. France, 19 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-44417-abdelaziz-arib-v-france-19-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-44417-abdelaziz-arib-v-france-19-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU clarified that the Schengen Border Code must be interpreted as not allowing Member States to equate an external border with an internal border at which controls have been reintroduced. So, the Return Directive’s exceptions for third-country...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Joined Cases C 582/17 and C 583/17, H. and R. v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, 2 April 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-58217-and-c-58317-h-and-r-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie-2-april-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-58217-and-c-58317-h-and-r-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie-2-april-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that a third-country national who lodged an application for international protection in a first Member State, then left and subsequently lodged a new application in a second Member State is not entitled to rely, in an action brought un...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C‑297/17, C‑318/17, C‑319/17 and C‑438/17 Ibrahim, 19 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c29717-c31817-c31917-and-c43817-ibrahim-19-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c29717-c31817-c31917-and-c43817-ibrahim-19-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that an asylum seeker may not be transferred to the Member State that has previously granted him international protection if such living conditions would expose the applicant to a situation of extreme material poverty. The threshold wa...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C‑163/17 Jawo, 19 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c16317-jawo-19-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c16317-jawo-19-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that an asylum applicant may not be transferred under the Dublin III Regulation to the Member State responsible for processing their application if the living conditions would expose them to a situation of extreme material poverty amou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-635/17, E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-63517-e-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-63517-e-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 11(2) of Directive 2003/86 must be interpreted as precluding the rejection of an application for family reunification lodged by a sponsor in favour of a minor of whom she is allegedly the guardian solely on the grounds of lack of official doc...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17, M (Révocation du statut de réfugié)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-39116-c-7717-and-c-7817-m-revocation-du-statut-de-refugie" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-39116-c-7717-and-c-7817-m-revocation-du-statut-de-refugie</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The provisions of Article 14(4) to (6) of Directive 2011/95 cannot be interpreted as meaning that the effect of the revocation or the refusal of the refugee status is that the person concerned, who satisfies the material conditions set forth in Artic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[C-556/17 - Torubarov, 29 July 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/c-55617-torubarov-29-july-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/c-55617-torubarov-29-july-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In order to guarantee that an applicant for international protection has an effective judicial remedy within the meaning of Article 47 of the Charter, a national court or tribunal is required to vary a decision of the first-instance determining body...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-557/17, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justice v Y.Z, Z.Z. &amp; Y.Y.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-fourth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-fourth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Residence permits obtained in the context of family reunification and long-term resident status, under Directives 2003/86 and 2003/109, may be withdrawn if they were issued on the basis of falsified documents, even if the holders were unaware of the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-233/18 Haqbin, 12 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-23318-haqbin-12-november-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-23318-haqbin-12-november-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A sanction imposed in response of serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre or of seriously violent behaviour on behalf of an applicant for international protection cannot include withdrawal of material reception conditions relating t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C-181/16 Gnandi, 19 June 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-18116-gnandi-19-june-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-18116-gnandi-19-june-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States can issue a return decision together with, or right after, a negative decision on an asylum application at first instance, as long as they ensure that all judicial effects of the return decision are suspended during the time allowed to...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-647/16 A.H v Préfet du Pas-de Calais, 31 May 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/tribunal-administratif-de-lille" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/tribunal-administratif-de-lille</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 26(1) of the Dublin III Regulation precludes the issuance of a transfer decision by the determining Member-State until the requested Member-State implicitly or explicitly accepts the take charge/back request. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-647/16 A.H v Préfet du Pas-de Calais, 31 May 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-64716-ah-v-prefet-du-pas-de-calais-31-may-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-64716-ah-v-prefet-du-pas-de-calais-31-may-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 26(1) of the Dublin III Regulation precludes the issuance of a transfer decision by the determining Member-State until the requested Member-State implicitly or explicitly accepts the take charge/back request. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-661/17 M.A &amp; others, 23 January 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-66117-ma-amp-others-23-january-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-66117-ma-amp-others-23-january-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The notification about the intention of withdrawal from the EU by the Member-State responsible for the examination of the application for international protection does not trigger the determining Member-State’s obligation to make use of the discretio...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C-56/17 (Fathi), 4 October 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-5617-fathi-4-october-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-5617-fathi-4-october-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Member State is not required to issue a decision on its own responsibility under Dublin III when, in its capacity as the determining Member State, it found that there is no sufficient evidence to establish responsibility of another Member State. Do...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-484/17, K v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-48417-k-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-48417-k-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States may require individuals who have been residing in the country by virtue of family reunification to pass a civic integration examination on the language and society of the country in order to be granted an autonomous residence permit. Ho...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C‑662/17,  E.G. v Republika Slovenija]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-seventh-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-seventh-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled on whether an individual could appeal a decision which refused refugee status but granted subsidiary protection status, even if the rights and benefits afforded by each international protection status are identical in national law.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C‑47/17 and C‑48/17 , X and X v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c4717-and-c4817-x-and-x-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c4717-and-c4817-x-and-x-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled on the time limit for Member States to respond to requests for re-examination of "take charge" or "take back" requests and clarified that Member States should endeavour to respond within two weeks; if they do not the requesting Member...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-720/17 Bilali, 23 May 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-72017-bilali-23-may-2019-11996" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-72017-bilali-23-may-2019-11996</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States are required to revoke subsidiary protection on the basis of art. 19(1), if they find out that the conditions that led to the granting of status were never met, regardless of whether the incorrect assessment of facts leading to the stat...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C 404/17, A v Migrationsverket, 25 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-40417-a-v-migrationsverket-25-july-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-40417-a-v-migrationsverket-25-july-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Member State cannot rely on the rebuttable presumption under Articles 36 and 37 of the 2013 Asylum Procedures Directive (APD) in respect of the safe country of origin concept and subsequently find the application to be manifestly unfounded in accor...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-585/16 Alheto, 25 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-58516-alheto-25-july-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-58516-alheto-25-july-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Where a person is registered with UNRWA and then later applies for international protection in a European Union Member State such persons are in principle excluded from refugee status in the European Union unless it becomes evident, on the basis of a...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C-550/16 A and S, 12 April 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-55016-a-and-s-12-april-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-55016-a-and-s-12-april-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An asylum applicant who is below the age of 18 at the time of his or her entry into the territory of a Member State and of the introduction of his or her asylum application in that State, but who, in the course of the asylum procedure, attains the ag...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C 18/16, K., 14 September 2017]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-1816-k-14-september-2017" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-1816-k-14-september-2017</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerns the validity of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3)(a) and (b) of the Receptions Conditions Directive in the light of Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C 201/16, Shiri, 25 October 2017]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-20116-shiri-25-october-2017" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-20116-shiri-25-october-2017</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When a Dublin transfer does not take place within the six-month time limit prescribed in the Dublin III Regulation, responsibility for examining the application for international protection is automatically shifted to the Member State that requested...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C 60/16, Khir Amayry, 13 September 2017]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-6016-khir-amayry-13-september-2017" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-6016-khir-amayry-13-september-2017</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerns the calculation of time limits for detention for the purpose of a Dublin transfer under Article 28 of the Dublin III Regulation (DRIII).]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C-82/16 K.A. and Others, 8 May 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-8216-ka-and-others-8-may-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-8216-ka-and-others-8-may-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Requests for family reunification must be examined even if the third-country national, who is a family member of an EU citizen who has never exercised his right of freedom of movement, is subject to an entry ban. Whether there is a relationship of de...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Joined Cases C-331/16 K. and C-366/16 H.F., 2 May 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-33116-k-and-c-36616-hf-2-may-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-33116-k-and-c-36616-hf-2-may-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The fact that a person has been the subject, in the past, of a decision excluding him from refugee status cannot automatically permit the finding that the mere presence of that person in the territory of the host Member State constitutes a genuine, p...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-369/17, Shajin Ahmed v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-second-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-second-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[CJEU rules that Hungarian national law which defines ‘serious crime’ (in the context of exclusion from subsidiary protection) as a crime with a possible custodial of 5 years sentence as incompatible with the Qualification Directive. Instead, each cri...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-652/16, Nigyar Rauf Kaza Ahmedbekova,  Rauf Emin Ogla Ahmedbekov v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-65216-nigyar-rauf-kaza-ahmedbekova-rauf-emin-ogla-ahmedbekov-v-zamestnik-predsedatel-na-darzhavna-agentsia-za-bezhantsite" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-65216-nigyar-rauf-kaza-ahmedbekova-rauf-emin-ogla-ahmedbekov-v-zamestnik-predsedatel-na-darzhavna-agentsia-za-bezhantsite</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[CJEU rules on the correct processing of applications for international protection lodged separately by family members and the interrelationship between them.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
