<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/cjeu</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries/cjeu" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[CJEU Cases]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>CJEU Cases published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-10-07T14:41:31+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky, Case C-257/22, 09/11/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-tenth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-tenth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky establishes that the right to remain under the Asylum Procedures Directive (2013/32) completely immunises an applicant from being classified as an illegally staying third-cou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T14:41:31+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos, Case C-280/21, 12/01/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-pi-v-migracijos-departamentas-prie-lietuvos-respublikos-vidaus-reikalu-ministerijos-case-c-28021-12012023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-pi-v-migracijos-departamentas-prie-lietuvos-respublikos-vidaus-reikalu-ministerijos-case-c-28021-12012023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court of Justice held that defending personal interests against illegally acting non-state actors due to state corruption can be regarded as ‘political opinion’ under Directive 2011/95 if perceived as opposition by the persecuting actors.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T15:12:11+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE, Case C-768/19, 09/09/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-se-case-c-76819-09092021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-se-case-c-76819-09092021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that the relevant point in time to assess the ‘minor’ status of a beneficiary of international protection under the Qualification Directive is the date on which the applicant makes an (informal) application for international protect...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T14:38:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - XY v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl, Case C-18/20, 09/09/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-xy-v-bundesamt-fur-fremdenwesen-und-asyl-case-c-1820-09092021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-xy-v-bundesamt-fur-fremdenwesen-und-asyl-case-c-1820-09092021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[New elements or findings which have arisen or have been presented by the applicant in subsequent applications can consist, on the one hand, of those which have arisen after the decision became final, and, on the other hand, of those which have not be...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T14:23:07+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - ASGI and Others v Presidency of the Council of Ministers and Ministry of Economy and Finance, Case C-462/20, 28/10/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-asgi-and-others-v-presidency-of-the-council-of-ministers-and-ministry-of-economy-and-finance-case-c-46220-28102021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-asgi-and-others-v-presidency-of-the-council-of-ministers-and-ministry-of-economy-and-finance-case-c-46220-28102021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States may exclude single permit holders, EU Blue Card holders, and long-term residents from a family discount card scheme, provided the card is not classified as "social security," "social assistance," or "social protection" under national la...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T14:09:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU (Grand Chamber) - European Commission v Hungary, Case C-821/19, 16/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-grand-chamber-european-commission-v-hungary-case-c-82119-16112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-grand-chamber-european-commission-v-hungary-case-c-82119-16112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU found that national legislation cannot introduce a new inadmissibility ground for applications for international protection that is not already included in the list of inadmissibility grounds in Directive 2013/32. In addition, the CJEU ruled...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-29T13:20:24+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU (Grand Chamber) - LW v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Case C-91/20, 09/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-grand-chamber-lw-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-9120-09112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-grand-chamber-lw-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-9120-09112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court of Justice held that Directive 2011/95 does not preclude a Member State from granting refugee status to a minor through one of his parents, even though there is no risk of persecution in case of removal to his country of nationality (Tunisi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T13:38:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU (Grand Chamber) - X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, Case C-69/21, 22/11/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-grand-chamber-x-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-case-c-6921-22112022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-grand-chamber-x-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-case-c-6921-22112022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Return Directive precludes the adoption of a return decision when the person concerned is suffering from a serious illness and there are substantial grounds to believe that their pain would significantly increase if returned, because effective tr...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T13:28:53+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Milkiyas Addis v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Case C-517/17, 16/07/2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-milkiyas-addis-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-51717-16072020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-milkiyas-addis-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-51717-16072020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that Articles 14 and 34 of the Recast Qualifications Directive must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that a failure to comply with the obligation to give a personal interview to an international protecti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-11T11:05:22+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany, CJEU, J.B. and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, C 364/22, 25 May 2023.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/germany-cjeu-jb-and-others-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-36422-25-may-2023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-cjeu-jb-and-others-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-36422-25-may-2023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Rejection of the re-application of Lebanese nationals as inadmissible "subsequent applications" under Directive 2013/32/EU.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-16T15:17:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-756/21 X v International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others, 29 June 2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ireland-european-court-of-justice-first-chamber-x-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-and-others-c-75621-29-june-2023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ireland-european-court-of-justice-first-chamber-x-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-and-others-c-75621-29-june-2023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/83 requires the determining authority, under its duty of cooperation, to obtain up-to-date country of origin information and, where relevant, a medico-legal report on the applicant’s mental health; a breach of that duty...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:30:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-718/24 Aleb, 5 February 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/bulgaria-cjeu-second-chamber-aleb-c-71824-5-february-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/bulgaria-cjeu-second-chamber-aleb-c-71824-5-february-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The safe third country ground under Article 33(2)(c) of Directive 2013/32 is optional; an application may be declared inadmissible on that basis even if the applicant qualifies for international protection, but it cannot be rejected as unfounded on t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:52:01+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C‑58/23 Abboudnam, 27 September 2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-eighth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-eighth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A three-day time limit, including public holidays and non-working days, for lodging an appeal against a decision rejecting an application for international protection as manifestly unfounded under an accelerated procedure is incompatible with Article...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:31:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU, H. A. v Etat belge C-194/19]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-h-a-v-etat-belge-c-19419" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-h-a-v-etat-belge-c-19419</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 27(1) of Dublin III Regulation read in the light of recital 19 thereof, and Article 47 of the Charter preclude national legislation that bars domestic courts from assessing an application for annulment of a Dublin transfer decision by conside...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T08:53:03+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU, L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland C-8/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-lr-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-820" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-lr-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-820</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[National legislation that grants the possibility of rejecting an application made by a third-country national or a stateless person for international protection, whose previous application seeking refugee status in another Member State implementing t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:36:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU -  C-921/19, LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/lh-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/lh-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 40(2) of the Asylum Procedures Directive does not distinguish between initial and subsequent applications for international protection. As such, Member States should not treat the assessment of evidence submitted in subsequent applications di...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:10:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C 901/19, CF and DN  v Bundesrepublik Deutschland  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The assessment of the existence of indiscriminate violence under Article 15 (c) of the Qualification Directive may not be based exclusively on a quantitative assessment of casualties and population ratios. A comprehensive appraisal of all the circums...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:11:53+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-718/19, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others v Conseil des ministers]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-grand-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-grand-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that the maximum period of detention for the purpose of removal of a person on the grounds of public policy or public security under Belgian law, according to which Union citizens and their family members are treated in the same way...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:12:31+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-546/19, BZ v Westerwaldkreis, 3 June 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-fourth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-fourth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court finds that third-country nationals without a valid residence title in a Member State are illegally present in that Member State and thus fall under the scope of the Return Directive, irrespective of the situation or the measures that led to...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:13:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-507/19, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. XT, 13 January 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When analysing if protection from UNRWA has ceased (Article 12(1)(a) Directive 2011/95), account must be taken of the possibility for the individual to concretely access effective protection in any of the other fields within UNRWA area of operations....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T11:32:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C-924/19 PPU and C-925/19 PPU, FMS and Others v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság, 14 May 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-92419-ppu-and-c-92519-ppu-fms-and-others-v-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-del-alfoldi-regionalis-igazgatosag-and-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-14-may-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-92419-ppu-and-c-92519-ppu-fms-and-others-v-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-del-alfoldi-regionalis-igazgatosag-and-orszagos-idegenrendeszeti-foigazgatosag-14-may-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[1. A change of the destination country in a return decision by an administrative authority should be regarded as a new return decision requiring an effective remedy in compliance with Article 47 CFREU.2. The national legislation providing for a safe...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C  213/17 (X), 5 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-21317-x-5-july-2018-12053" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-21317-x-5-july-2018-12053</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerned the application of a take back request under the the Dublin III Regulation where an asylum applicant has lodged multiple asylum applications in two different Member States and is the subject of a European Arrest Warrant.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Court of The Hague, 19 March 2018, NL 17.11921]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-the-hague-hearing-location-zwolle-ht-masmeyer" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-the-hague-hearing-location-zwolle-ht-masmeyer</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In assessing the credibility of a sexual orientation-related claim, personal circumstances have to be taken into account. That a person is not able to elaborate on his awareness and acceptance of his sexual orientation, is not sufficient to conclude...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C 180/17, X and Y, 26 September 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-18017-x-and-y-26-september-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-18017-x-and-y-26-september-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled on  the scope of the right to an effective remedy provided for in Article 46 of the (Recast) Asylum Procedures Directive and in Article 13 of the Returns Directive.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C 175/17 X, 26 September 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-17517-x-26-september-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-17517-x-26-september-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled on  the scope of the right to an effective remedy provided for in Article 39 of the Asylum Procedures Directive and in Article 13 of the Returns Directive.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C‑129/18, SM (Enfant placé sous kafala algérienne), 26 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c12918-sm-enfant-place-sous-kafala-algerienne-26-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c12918-sm-enfant-place-sous-kafala-algerienne-26-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Algerian Kafala system does not create a parent/child relationship within the meaning of direct descendant under Directive 2004/38 but it does fall under the notion of other family members of Article 3(2)(a) of the same Directive. The State must...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU  ̶  C-706/18 X v Belgium, 20 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-sixth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-sixth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The principle of effectiveness and the objectives of the Family Reunification Directive preclude domestic legislation that foresees the automatic issue of an entry and residence permit for family reunification on the sole ground that the time limit t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C‑713/17, Ayubi, 21 November 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c71317-ayubi-21-november-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c71317-ayubi-21-november-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Persons entitled to refugee protection should be accorded the same treatment regarding assistance as provided to nationals of the Member State. Article 29 Directive 2011/95 and Article 23 Geneva Convention do not make this treatment dependant on the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C‑412/17 and C‑474/17 Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Touring Tours und Travel GmbH and Sociedad de Transportes SA, 13 December 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c41217-and-c47417-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-touring-tours-und-travel-gmbh-and-sociedad-de-transportes-sa-13-december-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c41217-and-c47417-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-touring-tours-und-travel-gmbh-and-sociedad-de-transportes-sa-13-december-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A national measure requiring private coach transporters crossing internal borders to check the documents of the passengers on board and refuse the access to those not provided with passport or residence permit is prohibited under Article 21(a) of Reg...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-519/18 TB, 12 December 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-51918-tb-12-december-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-51918-tb-12-december-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 10(2) of Directive 2003/86 allows Member States to define autonomously the nature of the relationship of dependence between the sponsor and the family member not referred in art. 4, as long as the national law have regard of all the relevant...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-806/18 JZ (Peine de prison en cas d’interdiction d‘entrée), 17 September 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-eu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-eu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Return Directive does not preclude Member States from introducing legislation that imposes a custodial sentence on individuals for whom the return procedure has been exahusted but still remain in the territory, where the criminal act consists in...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C 36/20 PPU, V.L. v Spain, 25 June 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-3620-ppu-vl-v-spain-25-june-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-3620-ppu-vl-v-spain-25-june-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU found that the judge assigned to rule upon the applicant’s detention should have transmitted his request for international protection to the competent authority so it could be registered, and the applicant could enjoy his rights provided by...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-255/19 Secretary of State for the Home Department v OA, 20 January 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-25519-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-v-oa-20-january-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-25519-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-v-oa-20-january-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the context of cessation of refugee status under Article 11 (1)(e), the change in circumstances must remedy the reasons which led to the recognition of refugee status; a country of origin’s ability or inability to demonstrate that it can provide p...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU  ̶  C 380/18, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E.P., 12 December 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-38018-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-v-ep-12-december-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-38018-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-v-ep-12-december-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 6(1)(e) of the Schengen Borders Code does not preclude the issue of a return decision to a third-country national not subject to a visa requirement and who is present on the territory of a M.S. for a short stay if that national is suspected o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-353/16, MP v Secretary of State for the Home Department]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-35316-mp-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-35316-mp-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The fact that a person cannot be repatriated under Article 3 of the ECHR does not imply that that person should be granted a leave to reside in the host country by way of subsidiary protection under Directive 2004/83. The person concerned is eligible...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-673/19 M and Others (Transfert vers un État membre), 24 February 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-67319-m-and-others-transfert-vers-un-etat-membre-24-february-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-67319-m-and-others-transfert-vers-un-etat-membre-24-february-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Return Directive does not prevent a Member State from placing in administrative detention a third-country national residing illegally on its territory, in order to carry out the forced transfer of that national to another Member State in which th...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C 715/17, C718/17 and C719/17 Commission v Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, 2 April 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-71517-c71817-and-c71917-commission-v-poland-hungary-and-the-czech-republic-2-april-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-71517-c71817-and-c71917-commission-v-poland-hungary-and-the-czech-republic-2-april-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States cannot merely refer to the existence of public order and security concerns under Article 72 TFEU, in order to derogate from their obligations under Title V without proving that it was necessary to do so. Such a derogation cannot be made...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-836/18 RH, 27 February 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-83618-rh-27-february-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-83618-rh-27-february-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Union citizen’s lack of sufficient resources for their family member, who is a third-country national, not to become a burden on the national social system, cannot sufficiently establish a reason to refuse a derived right of residence on the basis...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-112/20 Belgian State (Retour du parent d’un mineur), 11 March 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-tenth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-tenth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States are required to take due account of the best interests of the child before adopting a return decision accompanied by an entry ban, even where the person to whom that decision is addressed is not a minor but his or her father.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C-18/19 WM, 2 July 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-cjeu" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-cjeu</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[EU law does not preclude national legislation that allows an illegally staying third-country national to be detained in prison accommodation for removal, on the ground that he poses a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C 444/17, Abdelaziz Arib v. France, 19 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-44417-abdelaziz-arib-v-france-19-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-44417-abdelaziz-arib-v-france-19-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU clarified that the Schengen Border Code must be interpreted as not allowing Member States to equate an external border with an internal border at which controls have been reintroduced. So, the Return Directive’s exceptions for third-country...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Joined Cases C 582/17 and C 583/17, H. and R. v. Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, 2 April 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-58217-and-c-58317-h-and-r-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie-2-april-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-58217-and-c-58317-h-and-r-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie-2-april-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that a third-country national who lodged an application for international protection in a first Member State, then left and subsequently lodged a new application in a second Member State is not entitled to rely, in an action brought un...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Joined Cases C‑297/17, C‑318/17, C‑319/17 and C‑438/17 Ibrahim, 19 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c29717-c31817-c31917-and-c43817-ibrahim-19-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c29717-c31817-c31917-and-c43817-ibrahim-19-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that an asylum seeker may not be transferred to the Member State that has previously granted him international protection if such living conditions would expose the applicant to a situation of extreme material poverty. The threshold wa...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C‑163/17 Jawo, 19 March 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c16317-jawo-19-march-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c16317-jawo-19-march-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that an asylum applicant may not be transferred under the Dublin III Regulation to the Member State responsible for processing their application if the living conditions would expose them to a situation of extreme material poverty amou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-635/17, E. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-63517-e-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-63517-e-v-staatssecretaris-van-veiligheid-en-justitie</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 11(2) of Directive 2003/86 must be interpreted as precluding the rejection of an application for family reunification lodged by a sponsor in favour of a minor of whom she is allegedly the guardian solely on the grounds of lack of official doc...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Joined Cases C-391/16, C-77/17 and C-78/17, M (Révocation du statut de réfugié)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-joined-cases-c-39116-c-7717-and-c-7817-m-revocation-du-statut-de-refugie" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-joined-cases-c-39116-c-7717-and-c-7817-m-revocation-du-statut-de-refugie</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The provisions of Article 14(4) to (6) of Directive 2011/95 cannot be interpreted as meaning that the effect of the revocation or the refusal of the refugee status is that the person concerned, who satisfies the material conditions set forth in Artic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[C-556/17 - Torubarov, 29 July 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/c-55617-torubarov-29-july-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/c-55617-torubarov-29-july-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In order to guarantee that an applicant for international protection has an effective judicial remedy within the meaning of Article 47 of the Charter, a national court or tribunal is required to vary a decision of the first-instance determining body...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-557/17, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justice v Y.Z, Z.Z. &amp; Y.Y.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-fourth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-fourth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Residence permits obtained in the context of family reunification and long-term resident status, under Directives 2003/86 and 2003/109, may be withdrawn if they were issued on the basis of falsified documents, even if the holders were unaware of the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-233/18 Haqbin, 12 November 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-c-23318-haqbin-12-november-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-c-23318-haqbin-12-november-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A sanction imposed in response of serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre or of seriously violent behaviour on behalf of an applicant for international protection cannot include withdrawal of material reception conditions relating t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – Case C-181/16 Gnandi, 19 June 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-case-c-18116-gnandi-19-june-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-case-c-18116-gnandi-19-june-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States can issue a return decision together with, or right after, a negative decision on an asylum application at first instance, as long as they ensure that all judicial effects of the return decision are suspended during the time allowed to...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:47:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
