<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[Case summaries]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>Case summaries published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-04-03T13:49:25+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain - National Court. Chamber of Contentious-Administrative Proceedings n. 478/2022, 24 February 2022, Appeal n. 769/2020 ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-fifth-section" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-fifth-section</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Account must be taken of the evolution of the circumstances in the country of origin, from the moment of the application for international protection, until the moment when the Court has to take a decision.In this instance, relying on the change of c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-03T13:49:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.D. and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 71321/17 and 9 others, 14 September 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[To determine whether there is a violation of Articles 2 and 3 ECHR in the context of expulsion, the Court analyses if the Applicant has presented substantial grounds on (i) whether he faces a real risk of ill-treatment or death in the country of dest...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-03T11:33:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-507/19, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. XT, 13 January 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When analysing if protection from UNRWA has ceased (Article 12(1)(a) Directive 2011/95), account must be taken of the possibility for the individual to concretely access effective protection in any of the other fields within UNRWA area of operations....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T11:32:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/kv-sri-lanka-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/kv-sri-lanka-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[This appeal considered what the correct approach is to the assessment of medical evidence in asylum claims alleging torture. Hence, it was declared that decision-makers can receive assistance from medical experts who are able to offer an opinion abou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France – Court of Appeal of Toulouse, 18 April 2017, n° 17/00517]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/france-court-of-appeal-of-toulouse-18-april-2017-n-1700517" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/france-court-of-appeal-of-toulouse-18-april-2017-n-1700517</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Judge of liberty and detention of the Toulouse Appeal Court considered that an extension of the applicant’s administrative detention could mean subjecting her to imminent forcible return to her country of origin, which was not compatible with art...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Federal Constitutional Court, Court Order of the First Chamber of the Second Senate, 25 March 2020, 2 BvR 113/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/federal-constitutional-court-bundesverfassungsgericht-judges-vosskuhle-kessal-wulf-maidowski" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/federal-constitutional-court-bundesverfassungsgericht-judges-vosskuhle-kessal-wulf-maidowski</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The right to be heard (Art. 103 par. 1 German Basic Law - Grundgesetz) guarantees every party access to all documents relevant for the decision, which includes status reports on the applicant’s country of origin in asylum cases.The right to be heard...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria - Federal Administrative Court, 17 December 2014, W101 2009216-1]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-federal-administrative-court-17-december-2014-w101-2009216-1" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-federal-administrative-court-17-december-2014-w101-2009216-1</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Palestinian who leaves Syria due to the unstable security situation as a result of the Syrian conflict must be regarded as having been forced to leave UNRWA’s area of operations and may thus qualify as a refugee without being required to show fear...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Federal Administrative Court, 24 March 2015 1434108-2/21E]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-federal-administrative-court-24-march-2015-1434108-221e" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-federal-administrative-court-24-march-2015-1434108-221e</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An excessive length of the procedure (in this case 2 years and 5 months) for examining the jurisdiction for the application for international protection, which is not caused by the protection seeker himself, leads to an obligation of the Member State...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland: Federal administrative court, 13 March 2020,  D-1003/2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-13-march-2020-d-10032020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-13-march-2020-d-10032020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An application for a revision of a final court decision of the Swiss Federal Court is only admissible if the applicant presents new relevant facts or evidence which he was not able to provide in previous proceedings even if he had acted with due dili...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Federal Administrative Court, 27 August 2015, W125 2111611-1]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-federal-administrative-court-27-august-2015-w125-2111611-1" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-federal-administrative-court-27-august-2015-w125-2111611-1</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Austrian asylum authorities have to consider accurately and comprehensively the changes in the legal situation and the development of the actual situation of asylum seekers in Hungary when deciding on a Dublin transfer to this country.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Constitutional Court – 11. Juni 2018, E 4317/2017-11]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/constitutional-court-verfassungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/constitutional-court-verfassungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Courts must establish the current situation of the region from which the complainant originates or which can be considered as an internal flight alternative and relate it to the individual situation of the complainant in the grounds of the decision.I...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany - Constitutional Court of the Free State of Saxony, 24 April 2020, Vf. 11-IV-20 (HS); 12-IV-20 (e.A.)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/constitutional-court-of-the-free-state-of-saxony" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/constitutional-court-of-the-free-state-of-saxony</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The application of provisions on preclusion must always be decided without discretionary error. If the lower court does not make any discretionary considerations at all for its decision to apply a provision on preclusion when rejecting evidence due t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Administrative Court Leipzig (VG), 22 April 2020, 3 L 204/20.A]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-leipzig" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-leipzig</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An asylum seeker is entitled to request the temporary termination of his or her stay in an accommodation centre and to seek alternative accommodation if compliance with the distancing rules of the Saxon Corona Protection Ordinance is not possible in...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Administrative Court Osnabrück, Order of 20 March 2020, 5 B 88/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-osnabruck-verwaltungsgericht-osnabruck" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-osnabruck-verwaltungsgericht-osnabruck</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Dublin transfers, which have been suspended indefinitely due to the so-called Corona pandemic, constitute a domestic-related obstacle to execution in the sense of an objective impossibility which leads to a temporary suspension of deportation (Du...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Supreme Administrative Court, 24 February 2015, Ra 2014/18/0063]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/supreme-administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/supreme-administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In order to ensure that the state is capable of providing protection, the EU Qualification Directive stipulates that a state security system must be guaranteed and also requires an examination of the special circumstances of the individual case.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Constitutional Court – 26 June 2020, E 810/2020 ua]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-constitutional-court-26-june-2020-e-8102020-ua" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-constitutional-court-26-june-2020-e-8102020-ua</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Courts must establish the current situation of the region from which the complainant originates and relate it to the individual situation of the complainant in the grounds of the decision.In the case of an Afghan family, the lower instance court did...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria –  Administrative Court - 24 June 2020, Ra 2020/20/0195]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A court may dismiss the appeal without further proceedings in a non-public session, if the appeal does not depend on the solution of a legal question that is of fundamental significance.In the case of an Afghan, the appeal does not depend on the solu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria: Supreme Administrative Court, 1 March 2018, Ra 2017/19/0425]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-supreme-administrative-court-1-march-2018-ra-2017190425" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-supreme-administrative-court-1-march-2018-ra-2017190425</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the assessment of a real risk of inhuman treatment or a serious threat to life or physical integrity in a situation of indiscriminate violence within an armed conflict, not only the general security and supply situation has to be considered, but a...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Higher Regional Court Brunswick, Order of 11 April 2020, 3 W 30/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/higher-regional-court-brunswick-oberlandesgericht-braunschweig" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/higher-regional-court-brunswick-oberlandesgericht-braunschweig</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 48 para. 3 sentence 2 and 3 AufenthG does not offer a suitable legal basis for the search of homes.The issue of a search warrant according to police and public order law requires concrete evidence that certain documents could be detected. The...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Higher Administrative Court Lüneburg, 18 September 2020, 10 LA 193/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/higher-administrative-court-niedersachsisches-oberverwaltungsgericht-luneburg" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/higher-administrative-court-niedersachsisches-oberverwaltungsgericht-luneburg</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[As an extraneous consideration, the Coronavirus pandemic does not justify the suspension of the implementation of Dublin transfer decisions. The de facto suspension of Dublin transfers due to the Coronavirus pandemic does not interrupt the time limit...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Baden-Württemberg – Higher Administrative Court, 29.11.2019, A 11 S 2374/19, A 11 S 2375/19]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/verwaltungsgerichtshof-higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/verwaltungsgerichtshof-higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The ECJ has to decide on the assessment of the existence of a serious individual threat by reason of mere presence in a certain area. It has to decide whether there is a minimal threshold of civilian fatalities that excludes such risk or if a holisti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal - I. v. Immigration and Borders Service, No. 2364/18.0BELSB, 14 May 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-i-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-2364180belsb-14-may-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-i-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-2364180belsb-14-may-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Since there is a high risk of exposure to inhuman and degrading treatment under Article 3 ECHR and Article 4 CFREU, Portugal should not allow the applicant’s transfer to Italy. The Court also found that there had been a violation of his right to a pr...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal - A v. Immigration and Borders Service, No. 61/20.6BELSB, 2 July 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-a-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-61206belsb-2-july-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-a-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-61206belsb-2-july-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court concluded that Italy had already accepted the take back request and therefore Portugal should proceed with the applicant’s transfer in accordance with the Dublin Regulation III. Since Italy had already rejected the applicant’s first request...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal - J v. Immigration and Borders Service, No. 263/18.5 BELSB, 11 July 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-j-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-263185-belsb-11-july-2018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-j-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-263185-belsb-11-july-2018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court considered that the decision-maker should have had taken into consideration the applicant’s alleged vulnerable situation, and as a result ordered the case’s remittal to the Central Administrative Court of Lisbon so evidence could be collect...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands - Council of State, Administrative Law section, 22 April 2020, 201904529/1/V3]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-law-section-22-april-2020-2019045291v3" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-law-section-22-april-2020-2019045291v3</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Council of State applies the reasoning of ECtHR and CJEU jurisprudence to the reception conditions in Hungary to conclude that there may be a risk of ill-treatment upon return (Article 3 ECHR / Article 4 CFREU infringement) when a particularly vu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Court of The Hague, 20 April 2018, NL 18.5178]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-the-hague-hearing-location-s-hertogenbosch-s-van-lokven" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-the-hague-hearing-location-s-hertogenbosch-s-van-lokven</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The State Secretary has to carefully weigh interests when deciding about the application of Article 17 (discretionary clauses) of the Dublin Regulation where it concerns an adult applicant whose family members are beneficiaries of international prote...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands - Council of State, Administrative Law section, 19 December 2018, 201808522/1/V3]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-law-section-19-december-2018-2018085221v3" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-law-section-19-december-2018-2018085221v3</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Council of State concludes that the Legislative Decree 113/2018 (also referred to as ‘Salvini Decree’) that reorganises the Italian reception facilities for asylum seekers does not affect the principle of mutual trust between EU member states und...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands - Council of State, Administrative Law section, 19 December 2018, 201808522/1/V3]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-law-section-19-december-2018-2018085221v3-12666" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-law-section-19-december-2018-2018085221v3-12666</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Council of State concludes that the Legislative Decree 113/2018 (also referred to as ‘Salvini Decree’) that reorganises the Italian reception facilities for asylum seekers does not affect the principle of mutual trust between EU member states und...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Court of The Hague, 19 March 2018, NL 17.11921]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-the-hague-19-march-2018-nl-1711921" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-the-hague-19-march-2018-nl-1711921</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In assessing the credibility of a sexual orientation-related claim, personal circumstances have to be taken into account. That a person is not able to elaborate on his awareness and acceptance of his sexual orientation, is not sufficient to conclude...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium, Council of Alien Law Litigation, 30 October 2019, no.  228 238 in case RvV 229 233/IV]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/raad-voor-vreemdelingenbetwistingen-conceil-du-contentieux-des-etrangers-council-of-alien-law-litigation" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/raad-voor-vreemdelingenbetwistingen-conceil-du-contentieux-des-etrangers-council-of-alien-law-litigation</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Given the condition of Greek health care, a person with a neurological condition, who requires medical follow-up and who has a family, may rightfully invoke Article 3 ECHR to block her, and her family’s, transfer to Greece. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands, Council of State, 27 May 2020, no.  201906353/1/V3. ECLI:NL:RVS:2020:1281]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/raad-van-state-council-of-state" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/raad-van-state-council-of-state</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Dutch Council of State does not consider ‘the best interest of the child’-criteriοn automatically fulfilled, in the context of a Dublin transfer, when an unaccompanied minor can be transferred to an adult family member in another MS. In turn, it...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France - Administrative Tribunal of Paris, Urgent Applications Judge, February 13th 2019 Decree, N° 1902037/9]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-tribunal-of-paris-urgent-applications-judge-juge-des-referes" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-tribunal-of-paris-urgent-applications-judge-juge-des-referes</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The difficulties in access to the regional telephone operating centers set up by the French Office for Immigration and Integration (OFII) in order to obtain an appointment to register asylum applications leads to legal uncertainty for asylum seekers....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium - Council for Alien Law Litigation, June 19th 2019, X. v. Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, n° 222 826]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-june-19th-2019-x-v-commissioner-general-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-n-222-826" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-june-19th-2019-x-v-commissioner-general-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-n-222-826</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Guinean woman who has been forced into marriage at a young age and subsequently harassed into marrying her late husband’s brother, is a refugee under article 1, section A §2 of the Geneva Convention. She risks being persecuted by reason of her memb...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland  - A., B., C. (Nigeria) v State Secretariat for Migration, 17 December 2019, No. E-962/2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/switzerland-a-b-c-nigeria-v-state-secretariat-for-migration-17-december-2019-no-e-9622019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-a-b-c-nigeria-v-state-secretariat-for-migration-17-december-2019-no-e-9622019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In view of article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Swiss authorities should obtain formal and detailed guarantees on care and accommodation from the Italian authorities before transferring families and vulnerable persons to Italy under...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland - Federal Administrative Court, A. (Eritrea) v. Secretary of State for Migration (SSM), March 4th 2019, E-7333/2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-a-eritrea-v-secretary-of-state-for-migration-ssm-march-4th-2019-e-73332018" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-a-eritrea-v-secretary-of-state-for-migration-ssm-march-4th-2019-e-73332018</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When deciding upon an asylum applicant’s age, authorities should assess the evidence in a holistic way, and not rely solely on medical examinations of the applicant. If, in the absence of sufficient evidence, authorities conclude that the applicant i...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[R (on the application of AH) (by this litigation friend, Francesco Jeff) v Secretary for the Home Department IJR, 2015]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/r-on-the-application-of-ah-by-this-litigation-friend-francesco-jeff-v-secretary-for-the-home-department-ijr-2015" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/r-on-the-application-of-ah-by-this-litigation-friend-francesco-jeff-v-secretary-for-the-home-department-ijr-2015</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[This is an application for judicial review of a decision made by the defendant local authority assessing the claimant to be an adult. The court reviewed important evidence such as the initial age assessment, together with statements from claimant’s s...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[R (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/r-joint-council-for-the-welfare-of-immigrants-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/r-joint-council-for-the-welfare-of-immigrants-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The High Court granted an order under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 that the scheme of “Right to Rent” set out in sections 20-37 of the Immigration Act 2014 was incompatible with ECHR rights, along with a further order that it could not be e...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[WA (Pakistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/wa-pakistan-v-the-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/wa-pakistan-v-the-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[This case dealt with the issue of the whether the guidance of MN and others Pakistan CG [2012] was still accurate in terms of asylum protection due to failing to ask the question of why an individual would act in a discreet way in their country of or...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: Supreme Court. Chamber of Contentious-Administrative Proceedings n. 1182/2016, 16th March 2016, Appeal No. 2563/2015]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/spain-supreme-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-n-11822016-16th-march-2016-appeal-no-25632015" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/spain-supreme-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-n-11822016-16th-march-2016-appeal-no-25632015</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The decision of denying asylum is disproportionate, as the fact that the acts of persecution are indiscriminate and affect a large majority of the population do not exclude the application of the 1951 Convention when the necessary elements of the pro...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: Supreme Court. Chamber of Contentious-Administrative Proceedings n. 2662/2020, 29th July 2020, Appeal No. 1953/2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/spain-supreme-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-n-26622020-29th-july-2020-appeal-no-19532019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/spain-supreme-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-n-26622020-29th-july-2020-appeal-no-19532019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Asylum applicants in Melilla and Ceuta can change their legal residence with the sole obligation of informing the relevant authorities.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: National Court. Chamber of Contentious-Administrative Proceedings n. 5177/2017, 5th December 2017, Appeal No. 234/2017]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/spain-national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-n-51772017-5th-december-2017-appeal-no-2342017" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/spain-national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-n-51772017-5th-december-2017-appeal-no-2342017</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When examining the acceptance of an asylum claim, the authorities have to study whether the testimony of the applicant is based on presumably true facts. Only if it is manifestly false could the admission of this application be denied.The principle o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: Court of Instruction of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 25th September 2020, Appeal No. 1722/2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-instruction-of-santa-cruz-de-tenerife" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-instruction-of-santa-cruz-de-tenerife</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The governmental authority is requesting an authorization to detain an immigrant after an alleged infraction of article 53 of the Organic Law 4/2000 in order to guarantee the enforcement of a possible return procedure. Following the procedures detail...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France – Court of Appeal of Toulouse, 18 April 2017, n° 17/00517]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-appeal-of-toulouse-jean-pierre-vergne-judge-of-liberty-and-detention" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-appeal-of-toulouse-jean-pierre-vergne-judge-of-liberty-and-detention</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Judge of liberty and detention of the Toulouse Appeal Court considered that an extension of the applicant’s administrative detention would mean subjecting her to imminent forcible return to her country of origin, which was not compatible with art...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France – Lille Judicial Tribunal, 17 March 2020, n° 20/00633]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/lille-judicial-tribunal-douai-appeal-court-valerie-lecrohart-judge-of-liberty-and-detention" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/lille-judicial-tribunal-douai-appeal-court-valerie-lecrohart-judge-of-liberty-and-detention</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the midst of the health crisis, the judge of liberty and detention of the Lille Judicial Tribunal considered that the health risk for the Applicant as well as for a third party, generated by the extension of the administrative detention was dispro...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal - Administrative Litigation Section of the Central Administrative Court, 11/02/2016, proc. nº 12873/16]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-administrative-litigation-section-of-the-central-administrative-court-11022016-proc-no-1287316" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-administrative-litigation-section-of-the-central-administrative-court-11022016-proc-no-1287316</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[It is an appeal against the decision handed down by the Administrative Court of Lisboa that granted asylum to a Syrian citizen.The recursive claim was declared unfounded by the Central Court, inter alia because the applicant’s mere transit from Brazi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal: A. v. Immigration and Borders Service, National Director, 17 November 2016 No. 0408/16]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-a-v-immigration-and-borders-service-national-director-17-november-2016-no-040816" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-a-v-immigration-and-borders-service-national-director-17-november-2016-no-040816</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that the new DL 34/2008 in no way affects the legal regime established by the previous Law 27/2008, which secures the right to a legal procedure free of judicial costs in asylum claims. The Law 27/2008, altered by the new Law 26/2014,...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium - Council of State, 27 February 2020, N° 247156]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-of-state-27-february-2020-n-247156" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-of-state-27-february-2020-n-247156</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In a case of an asylum application on the grounds of gender based persecution, supported by medical reports, the Belgian Council of State held that it belongs to the asylum authorities to investigate the origin of injuries, whose nature and seriousne...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium – Council for Alien Law Litigation, 29 April 2020, n° 235 658]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-29-april-2020-n-235-658" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-29-april-2020-n-235-658</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the case of an Afghan Shia Hazara applicant, the Belgian Council for Alien Litigation considered that the request for international protection was based on several sources of fear, which must be analysed in combination with each other, forming a c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain: National Court. Chamber of Contentious-Administrative Proceedings, 26 December 2013, Appeal No. 327/2012]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/spain-national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-26-december-2013-appeal-no-3272012" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/spain-national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-26-december-2013-appeal-no-3272012</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case appeals a decision of the Ministry of Interior to deny asylum and subsidiary protection considering the alleged crimes against humanity committed by the appellant, national of Iran. He was a member of a declared criminal organization. The Co...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium: Council for Alien Law Litigation, 31 March 2020, n° 234 709]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-31-march-2020-n-234-709" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-31-march-2020-n-234-709</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Well-grounded information is of central importance to any decision to exclude a person convicted for criminal matters from international protection in accordance with Article 1 F of the 1951 Refugee Convention.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
