<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[Case summaries]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>Case summaries published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-05-22T15:11:39+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Federal Administrative Tribunal (Court VI), A. v. SEM, 11 February 2020, F-7195/2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-gregor-chatton-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-andreas-trommer-as-judges" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-gregor-chatton-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-andreas-trommer-as-judges</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Dublin transfer to Bulgaria is annulled due to the vulnerability of the applicant combined with the risk of inadequate psychological treatment in Bulgaria, the applicant’s first country of asylum, and the lack sufficient individual guarantees in ca...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T15:11:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Federal Administrative Tribunal (Court V), A. v. SEM, 28th October 2020, E-3822/2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-the-judges-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-president-david-r-wenger-camilla-mariethoz-wyssen-susanne-genner-muriel-beck-kadima" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-the-judges-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-president-david-r-wenger-camilla-mariethoz-wyssen-susanne-genner-muriel-beck-kadima</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The State Secretariat of Migration (SSM) is obliged to assess the proportionality of a cessation measure in a case of a granted temporary residence in Switzerland. It was concluded that the cessation of temporary residence is not proportionate, when...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T14:38:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France, Court of Appeal of Douai, 19 February 2019, X v. Prefect of Pas de Calais, No RG19/00334]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-appeal-of-douai" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-appeal-of-douai</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A medical examination to assess vulnerability was requested by an applicant in administrative detention. This demand was not examined by the doctor in charge in the detention facility. Therefore, the court of appeal refused an extension of the applic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T14:00:34+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[European Court of Human Rights, A.A. v. Switzerland, 5 November 2019, n°32218/17]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-aa-v-switzerland-5-november-2019-n3221817" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-aa-v-switzerland-5-november-2019-n3221817</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When a national authority assesses the likely persecution of an applicant for religious purposes in case of return to his/her country of origin, the national authority must evaluate, inter allia, the way the applicant will live his/her faith in his/h...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:41:27+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Ireland, European Court of Justice (First Chamber), X v International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others, C-756/21, 29 June 2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ireland-european-court-of-justice-first-chamber-x-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-and-others-c-75621-29-june-2023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ireland-european-court-of-justice-first-chamber-x-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-and-others-c-75621-29-june-2023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/83 requires the determining authority, under its duty of cooperation, to obtain up-to-date country of origin information and, where relevant, a medico-legal report on the applicant’s mental health; a breach of that duty...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-21T07:46:53+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Bulgaria, CJEU (Second Chamber), Aleb, C-718/24, 5 February 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/bulgaria-cjeu-second-chamber-aleb-c-71824-5-february-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/bulgaria-cjeu-second-chamber-aleb-c-71824-5-february-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The safe third country ground under Article 33(2)(c) of Directive 2013/32 is optional; an application may be declared inadmissible on that basis even if the applicant qualifies for international protection, but it cannot be rejected as unfounded on t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-20T15:56:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Finland, ECHR, Z and others v. Finland, Application no 42758/23, 16 December 2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/the-european-court-of-human-rights-second-section" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/the-european-court-of-human-rights-second-section</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Violation of Article 8 regarding the right to respect for family life, arising from a domestic court order for the return of two children from Finland to Russia under the Hague Child Abduction Convention. ]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-20T15:01:03+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Slovenia, Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber), Abboudnam, C‑58/23, 27 September 2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-eighth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-eighth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A three-day time limit, including public holidays and non-working days, for lodging an appeal against a decision rejecting an application for international protection as manifestly unfounded under an accelerated procedure is incompatible with Article...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-20T14:35:29+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom - MA and HT v. Secretary OF State For The Home Department, Case No. CO/428/2021; CO/524/2021, England and Wales High Court, 19 January 2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/high-court-of-justice-justice-henshaw" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/high-court-of-justice-justice-henshaw</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Detention beyond the period for which an individual would otherwise need to be detained pursuant to Schedule 2 § 16(1) for the purpose of an age assessment that will or doesn’t comply with applicable legal standards would be unlawful. Also, both comm...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-21T15:28:26+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom - YMKA and Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Upper Tribunal, 1 November 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ymka-a1-fata-a2-wyma-a3-yyma-a4-ayaa-a5-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ymka-a1-fata-a2-wyma-a3-yyma-a4-ayaa-a5-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In this case the Upper Tribunal provided that the Refugee Convention doesn’t offer protection from social conservatism and that there is no protected right to enjoy a socially liberal lifestyle. However, the Convention may be considered to apply wher...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-21T15:24:10+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[SAVRAN v. DENMARK (Application no. 57467/15)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/savran-v-denmark-application-no-5746715" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/savran-v-denmark-application-no-5746715</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The current case concerns the expulsion of Mr. Arif Savran “the applicant” from Denmark to his country of origin, Turkey in 2015 because of his criminal convictions in Denmark. The applicant argued that his expulsion to Turkey had been in violation o...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-17T14:31:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ABDI v. DENMARK (Application no. 41643/19)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/abdi-v-denmark-application-no-4164319" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/abdi-v-denmark-application-no-4164319</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The expulsion of the applicant to Somalia was in violation of Article 8 of the Convention, because the offences committed by the applicant did not posed a threat to public order and he had not previously been warned of expulsion or had a conditional...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-17T13:54:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany: Administrative Court München, 9. May 2019, VG M 5 E 19.50027]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/germany-administrative-court-munchen-9-may-2019-vg-m-5-e-1950027" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-administrative-court-munchen-9-may-2019-vg-m-5-e-1950027</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that Greece is responsible for the examination of the applicant’s claim for international protection. The Court does not find that asylum procedures in Greece are flawed and that the applicant will be exposed to inhuman and degradin...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-13T08:44:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany - VG 21 1 B 583/18 MD, Administrative Court Magdeburg, 13 November 2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-magdeburg-13-november-2018-vg-21-1-b-58318-md" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-magdeburg-13-november-2018-vg-21-1-b-58318-md</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that a beneficiary of international protection cannot be deported to a country in which the individual concerned faces a serious risk of inhumane or degrading treatment. The risk of destitution after deportation is only excluded whe...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-21T15:30:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[AAR (OLF - MB confirmed) Ethiopia]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/aar-olf-mb-confirmed-ethiopia" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/aar-olf-mb-confirmed-ethiopia</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The assessment for a well-founded fear of persecution under the Refugee Convention must have regard to Country-of-Origin information and reports.  Moreover, if the publication of the applicant’s name will have no adverse effect on either him or his f...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T13:23:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Muqishta v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Application no. 27994/19, 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-fourth-session" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-fourth-session</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that the Bosnian administrative authorities unlawfully disregarded the legal provisions pursuant to which the applicant was entitled to other, similar benefits, despite the fact that she specifically invoked those provisions in her...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T12:59:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[M.H. and Others v. Croatia, Application no.15670/18 and 43115/18]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-first-session" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-first-session</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that there was a violation of Article 2 of the ECHR as State authorities used unreliable evidence to conclude their investigation into the death of an applicant. Moreover, the Court concluded that the State authorities violated Articl...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T11:57:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU, H. A. v Etat belge C-194/19]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-h-a-v-etat-belge-c-19419" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-h-a-v-etat-belge-c-19419</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 27(1) of Dublin III Regulation read in the light of recital 19 thereof, and Article 47 of the Charter preclude national legislation that bars domestic courts from assessing an application for annulment of a Dublin transfer decision by conside...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-12T08:53:03+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU, L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland C-8/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-lr-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-820" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-lr-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-820</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[National legislation that grants the possibility of rejecting an application made by a third-country national or a stateless person for international protection, whose previous application seeking refugee status in another Member State implementing t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:36:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU -  C-921/19, LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/lh-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/lh-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 40(2) of the Asylum Procedures Directive does not distinguish between initial and subsequent applications for international protection. As such, Member States should not treat the assessment of evidence submitted in subsequent applications di...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:10:45+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Case C 901/19, CF and DN  v Bundesrepublik Deutschland  ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The assessment of the existence of indiscriminate violence under Article 15 (c) of the Qualification Directive may not be based exclusively on a quantitative assessment of casualties and population ratios. A comprehensive appraisal of all the circums...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:11:53+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-718/19, Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone and Others v Conseil des ministers]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-grand-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-grand-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that the maximum period of detention for the purpose of removal of a person on the grounds of public policy or public security under Belgian law, according to which Union citizens and their family members are treated in the same way...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:12:31+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-546/19, BZ v Westerwaldkreis, 3 June 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-fourth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-fourth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court finds that third-country nationals without a valid residence title in a Member State are illegally present in that Member State and thus fall under the scope of the Return Directive, irrespective of the situation or the measures that led to...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:13:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Ireland - FM and RM v International Protection Appeals Tribunal & ANOR (Approved) ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/fm-and-rm-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-anor-approved" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/fm-and-rm-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-anor-approved</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The High Court found that the Tribunal failed to ask itself the correct legal questions when assessing the issue of state protection in the applicants’ country of origin.In specific, the High Court found that the Tribunalfailed to apply the correct a...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:10:17+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria, Consitutional Court, 24 September 2021, E 3047/2021-11]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/consitutional-court-verfassungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/consitutional-court-verfassungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[With regard to the granting of subsidiary protection, the existence of real risks to the rights under Art. 2, 3 ECHR must be examined, which includes the obligation to consider ongoing developments on the basis of available information. If a deterior...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-07T13:35:33+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, J.B. and others v Malta, Application no. 1766/23, 22 October 2024]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-jb-and-others-v-malta-application-no-176623-22-october-2024" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-jb-and-others-v-malta-application-no-176623-22-october-2024</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court ruled that Malta violated Article 3, 5 and 13 of the Convention given the fact that the applicants, who were minors, endured inhumane detention conditions, lacked an effective remedy to challenge their detention, and faced unlawful deprivat...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-06T15:46:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Committee against Torture, A.Y. v. Switzerland, CAT/C/74/D/887/2018, 30/01/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/committee-against-torture" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/committee-against-torture</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Committee found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention against Torture (non-refoulement), considering that the State party failed to address the individual circumstances and risk profile of the complainant, namely the fact that she was a woma...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-28T10:51:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Spain - National Court. Chamber of Contentious-Administrative Proceedings n. 478/2022, 24 February 2022, Appeal n. 769/2020 ]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-fifth-section" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/national-court-chamber-of-contentious-administrative-proceedings-fifth-section</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Account must be taken of the evolution of the circumstances in the country of origin, from the moment of the application for international protection, until the moment when the Court has to take a decision.In this instance, relying on the change of c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-03T13:49:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR – M.D. and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 71321/17 and 9 others, 14 September 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-md-and-others-v-russia-application-nos-7132117-and-9-others-14-september-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[To determine whether there is a violation of Articles 2 and 3 ECHR in the context of expulsion, the Court analyses if the Applicant has presented substantial grounds on (i) whether he faces a real risk of ill-treatment or death in the country of dest...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-03T11:33:02+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU – C-507/19, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. XT, 13 January 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-justice-third-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When analysing if protection from UNRWA has ceased (Article 12(1)(a) Directive 2011/95), account must be taken of the possibility for the individual to concretely access effective protection in any of the other fields within UNRWA area of operations....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-04-01T11:32:47+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom, KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/kv-sri-lanka-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/kv-sri-lanka-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2019</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[This appeal considered what the correct approach is to the assessment of medical evidence in asylum claims alleging torture. Hence, it was declared that decision-makers can receive assistance from medical experts who are able to offer an opinion abou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-11T11:16:24+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France – Court of Appeal of Toulouse, 18 April 2017, n° 17/00517]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/france-court-of-appeal-of-toulouse-18-april-2017-n-1700517" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/france-court-of-appeal-of-toulouse-18-april-2017-n-1700517</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Judge of liberty and detention of the Toulouse Appeal Court considered that an extension of the applicant’s administrative detention could mean subjecting her to imminent forcible return to her country of origin, which was not compatible with art...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Federal Constitutional Court, Court Order of the First Chamber of the Second Senate, 25 March 2020, 2 BvR 113/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/federal-constitutional-court-bundesverfassungsgericht-judges-vosskuhle-kessal-wulf-maidowski" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/federal-constitutional-court-bundesverfassungsgericht-judges-vosskuhle-kessal-wulf-maidowski</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The right to be heard (Art. 103 par. 1 German Basic Law - Grundgesetz) guarantees every party access to all documents relevant for the decision, which includes status reports on the applicant’s country of origin in asylum cases.The right to be heard...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria - Federal Administrative Court, 17 December 2014, W101 2009216-1]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-federal-administrative-court-17-december-2014-w101-2009216-1" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-federal-administrative-court-17-december-2014-w101-2009216-1</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Palestinian who leaves Syria due to the unstable security situation as a result of the Syrian conflict must be regarded as having been forced to leave UNRWA’s area of operations and may thus qualify as a refugee without being required to show fear...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Federal Administrative Court, 24 March 2015 1434108-2/21E]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-federal-administrative-court-24-march-2015-1434108-221e" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-federal-administrative-court-24-march-2015-1434108-221e</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An excessive length of the procedure (in this case 2 years and 5 months) for examining the jurisdiction for the application for international protection, which is not caused by the protection seeker himself, leads to an obligation of the Member State...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland: Federal administrative court, 13 March 2020,  D-1003/2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-13-march-2020-d-10032020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-13-march-2020-d-10032020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An application for a revision of a final court decision of the Swiss Federal Court is only admissible if the applicant presents new relevant facts or evidence which he was not able to provide in previous proceedings even if he had acted with due dili...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Federal Administrative Court, 27 August 2015, W125 2111611-1]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-federal-administrative-court-27-august-2015-w125-2111611-1" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-federal-administrative-court-27-august-2015-w125-2111611-1</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Austrian asylum authorities have to consider accurately and comprehensively the changes in the legal situation and the development of the actual situation of asylum seekers in Hungary when deciding on a Dublin transfer to this country.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Constitutional Court – 11. Juni 2018, E 4317/2017-11]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/constitutional-court-verfassungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/constitutional-court-verfassungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Courts must establish the current situation of the region from which the complainant originates or which can be considered as an internal flight alternative and relate it to the individual situation of the complainant in the grounds of the decision.I...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany - Constitutional Court of the Free State of Saxony, 24 April 2020, Vf. 11-IV-20 (HS); 12-IV-20 (e.A.)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/constitutional-court-of-the-free-state-of-saxony" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/constitutional-court-of-the-free-state-of-saxony</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The application of provisions on preclusion must always be decided without discretionary error. If the lower court does not make any discretionary considerations at all for its decision to apply a provision on preclusion when rejecting evidence due t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Administrative Court Leipzig (VG), 22 April 2020, 3 L 204/20.A]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-leipzig" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-leipzig</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An asylum seeker is entitled to request the temporary termination of his or her stay in an accommodation centre and to seek alternative accommodation if compliance with the distancing rules of the Saxon Corona Protection Ordinance is not possible in...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Administrative Court Osnabrück, Order of 20 March 2020, 5 B 88/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-osnabruck-verwaltungsgericht-osnabruck" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-osnabruck-verwaltungsgericht-osnabruck</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Dublin transfers, which have been suspended indefinitely due to the so-called Corona pandemic, constitute a domestic-related obstacle to execution in the sense of an objective impossibility which leads to a temporary suspension of deportation (Du...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Supreme Administrative Court, 24 February 2015, Ra 2014/18/0063]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/supreme-administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/supreme-administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In order to ensure that the state is capable of providing protection, the EU Qualification Directive stipulates that a state security system must be guaranteed and also requires an examination of the special circumstances of the individual case.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria – Constitutional Court – 26 June 2020, E 810/2020 ua]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-constitutional-court-26-june-2020-e-8102020-ua" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-constitutional-court-26-june-2020-e-8102020-ua</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Courts must establish the current situation of the region from which the complainant originates and relate it to the individual situation of the complainant in the grounds of the decision.In the case of an Afghan family, the lower instance court did...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria –  Administrative Court - 24 June 2020, Ra 2020/20/0195]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/administrative-court-verwaltungsgerichtshof</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A court may dismiss the appeal without further proceedings in a non-public session, if the appeal does not depend on the solution of a legal question that is of fundamental significance.In the case of an Afghan, the appeal does not depend on the solu...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Austria: Supreme Administrative Court, 1 March 2018, Ra 2017/19/0425]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/austria-supreme-administrative-court-1-march-2018-ra-2017190425" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/austria-supreme-administrative-court-1-march-2018-ra-2017190425</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the assessment of a real risk of inhuman treatment or a serious threat to life or physical integrity in a situation of indiscriminate violence within an armed conflict, not only the general security and supply situation has to be considered, but a...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Higher Regional Court Brunswick, Order of 11 April 2020, 3 W 30/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/higher-regional-court-brunswick-oberlandesgericht-braunschweig" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/higher-regional-court-brunswick-oberlandesgericht-braunschweig</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 48 para. 3 sentence 2 and 3 AufenthG does not offer a suitable legal basis for the search of homes.The issue of a search warrant according to police and public order law requires concrete evidence that certain documents could be detected. The...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany – Higher Administrative Court Lüneburg, 18 September 2020, 10 LA 193/20]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/higher-administrative-court-niedersachsisches-oberverwaltungsgericht-luneburg" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/higher-administrative-court-niedersachsisches-oberverwaltungsgericht-luneburg</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[As an extraneous consideration, the Coronavirus pandemic does not justify the suspension of the implementation of Dublin transfer decisions. The de facto suspension of Dublin transfers due to the Coronavirus pandemic does not interrupt the time limit...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Baden-Württemberg – Higher Administrative Court, 29.11.2019, A 11 S 2374/19, A 11 S 2375/19]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/verwaltungsgerichtshof-higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/verwaltungsgerichtshof-higher-administrative-court-baden-wurttemberg</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The ECJ has to decide on the assessment of the existence of a serious individual threat by reason of mere presence in a certain area. It has to decide whether there is a minimal threshold of civilian fatalities that excludes such risk or if a holisti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal - I. v. Immigration and Borders Service, No. 2364/18.0BELSB, 14 May 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-i-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-2364180belsb-14-may-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-i-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-2364180belsb-14-may-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Since there is a high risk of exposure to inhuman and degrading treatment under Article 3 ECHR and Article 4 CFREU, Portugal should not allow the applicant’s transfer to Italy. The Court also found that there had been a violation of his right to a pr...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Portugal - A v. Immigration and Borders Service, No. 61/20.6BELSB, 2 July 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/portugal-a-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-61206belsb-2-july-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/portugal-a-v-immigration-and-borders-service-no-61206belsb-2-july-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court concluded that Italy had already accepted the take back request and therefore Portugal should proceed with the applicant’s transfer in accordance with the Dublin Regulation III. Since Italy had already rejected the applicant’s first request...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-03-30T12:48:48+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
