<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/vendor/feed/atom.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US">
                        <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries</id>
                                <link href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/rss/case-summaries" rel="self"></link>
                                <title><![CDATA[Case summaries]]></title>
                    
                                <subtitle>Case summaries published by EDAL</subtitle>
                                                    <updated>2026-10-09T15:28:46+00:00</updated>
                        <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky, Case C-257/22, 09/11/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-tenth-chamber" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-tenth-chamber</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky establishes that the right to remain under the Asylum Procedures Directive (2013/32) completely immunises an applicant from being classified as an illegally staying third-cou...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T14:41:31+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CAT - M.T. v. Sweden, Communication No. 1109/2021, 08/11/2024]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cat-mt-v-sweden-communication-no-11092021-08112024" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cat-mt-v-sweden-communication-no-11092021-08112024</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Committee against Torture decided that the removal of the complainant, a (former) Turkish national, from Sweden to Kosovo, where he would face a real risk of being forcibly transferred to and subjected to torture in Türkiye, would constitute a vi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T14:27:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CAT - N.H. v. Switzerland, Communication No. 1024/2020, 30/04/2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cat-nh-v-switzerland-communication-no-10242020-30042025" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cat-nh-v-switzerland-communication-no-10242020-30042025</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Committee found that there were serious risks concerning the applicant’s situation that justify a more thorough examination than the simple summary assessment by the Federal Administrative Court. The absence of an effective, independent and impar...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T14:19:36+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CEDAW, C.O.E. v. Switzerland, Communication No. 172/2021, 2 July 2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cedaw-coe-v-switzerland-communication-no-1722021-02072025" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cedaw-coe-v-switzerland-communication-no-1722021-02072025</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The return of a survivor of trafficking and gender-based violence to the country of original harm under the Dublin III Regulation violates Articles 2(d) and 6 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, unless t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-09T15:28:46+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CRPD - Z.H. v. Sweden, Communication No. 58/2019, 06/09/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/crpd-zh-v-sweden-communication-no-582019-06092021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/crpd-zh-v-sweden-communication-no-582019-06092021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Sweden’s assessment as regards to the existence of real risk for the applicant suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and schizophrenia was arbitrary and a potential return to Afghanistan would violate the applicant’s rights under Artic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T10:58:41+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CAT - A.A. v. Sweden, Communication No. 918/2019, 24/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cat-aa-v-sweden-communication-no-9182019-24112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cat-aa-v-sweden-communication-no-9182019-24112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Committee clarified that an assessment of article 3(2) of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment requires an analysis of whether the individual concerned would be personally at a foreseeable r...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T10:45:32+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CEDAW - K.J. v. Switzerland, Communication No. 169/2021, 04/07/2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cedaw-kj-v-switzerland-communication-no-1692021-04072025" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cedaw-kj-v-switzerland-communication-no-1692021-04072025</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The removal of the author to Greece would amount to a breach of Articles 2 (c)-(f), 3, and 12 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, because the Swiss authorities failed to consider her vulnerable status as...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T10:37:12+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium - Council for Alien Law Litigation, No. 259 490, 23/08/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-no-259-490-23082021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-no-259-490-23082021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In the case of an Iranian applicant, who was already granted refugee status in Greece, the Court ruled that the first instance authority (the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons) must take into account information regarding the li...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T10:03:16+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium - Council for Alien Law Litigation, X v. Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, No. 264 130, 23/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-x-v-commissioner-general-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-no-264-130-23112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-x-v-commissioner-general-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-no-264-130-23112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court ruled that Palestinian refugees in the Gaza Strip can no longer count on the UNRWA’s protection or assistance. Therefore, the applicant does not fall within the scope of Article 1D of the Geneva Convention and must be recognized as a refuge...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T09:59:04+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Belgium - Council for Alien Law Litigation, X v. Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons, No. 258 932, 02/08/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-x-v-commissioner-general-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-no-258-932-02082021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/belgium-council-for-alien-law-litigation-x-v-commissioner-general-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-no-258-932-02082021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[HIV-related marginalisation and discrimination can reach the threshold of seriousness to establish persecution but is not sufficient to be granted international protection. In order to benefit from international protection, it must be established tha...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T09:54:29+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.A. v. Sweden, Application No. 4677/20, 13/07/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-aa-v-sweden-application-no-467720-13072023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-aa-v-sweden-application-no-467720-13072023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[An applicant will not be subject to risk of ill treatment under Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR, either because of the general security situation in Libya or the applicant’s previous work affiliated with the Gaddafi regime. The Court found that the situ...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T09:04:09+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - S.E. v. Serbia, Application No. 61365/16, 11/07/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-se-v-serbia-application-no-6136516-11072023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-se-v-serbia-application-no-6136516-11072023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Serbia, by refusing to issue the refugee applicant a travel document due to the absence of appropriate regulations, breached Article 2 § 2 of Protocol No. 4 of the ECHR]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-07T08:04:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.R.E. v. Greece, Application No. 15783/21, 07/01/2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-are-v-greece-application-no-1578321-07012025" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-are-v-greece-application-no-1578321-07012025</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Regarding the return of a Turkish applicant from Greece to Türkiye, her account constituted a prima facie case of refoulement, shifting the burden of proof to the Greek Government after evidentiary standards from secret detention cases were applied....]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:54:05+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Dabo v. Sweden, Application No. 12510/18, 18/01/2024]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-dabo-v-sweden-application-no-1251018-18012024" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-dabo-v-sweden-application-no-1251018-18012024</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found no violation of Article 8 ECHR took place as the requirements set out by the Swedish Temporary Restrictions Act were in line with the Family Reunification Directive and the European consensus. The balancing exercise was therefore perf...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:18:08+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - B.Ü. v. the Czech Republic, Application No. 9264/15, 06/10/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bu-v-the-czech-republic-application-no-926415-06102022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bu-v-the-czech-republic-application-no-926415-06102022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Complaint under Article 3 ECHR concerning the conditions of detention of a Turkish national in the Czech Bělá-Jezová detention centre declared inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies. Failure to conduct an independent, thorough and victi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:07:58+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - A.M.A. v. the Netherlands, Application No. 23048/19, 24/10/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ama-v-the-netherlands-application-no-2304819-24102023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ama-v-the-netherlands-application-no-2304819-24102023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[States have a rigorous procedural obligation under Article 3 ECHR when assessing the risk of ill-treatment in a last minute asylum application submitted shortly before removal. Even where a subsequent application is made at a very late stage, domesti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T14:38:16+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - B.F. and Others v. Switzerland, Applications Nos. 13258/18, 15500/18, 57303/18 and 9078/20, 04/07/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-bf-and-others-v-switzerland-applications-nos-1325818-1550018-5730318-and-907820-04072023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-bf-and-others-v-switzerland-applications-nos-1325818-1550018-5730318-and-907820-04072023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that the Swiss legislation sets stringent socio-economic requirements which in practice may render the right to family reunification impossible to exercise, in view of the personal situation of the sponsors residing in Switzerland and...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-08T12:10:15+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Al Alo v. Slovakia, Application No. 32084/19, 10/02/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-al-alo-v-slovakia-application-no-3208419-10022022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-al-alo-v-slovakia-application-no-3208419-10022022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found that there was a breach of Article 6(1) and (3)(d) of the Convention. The Court clarified that for a waiver of one’s rights to be compatible with the Convention, it must be shown that the applicant could reasonably have foreseen the c...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-06T16:20:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Zoletic and Others v. Azerbaijan, Application No. 20116/12, 07/10/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-zoletic-and-others-v-azerbaijan-application-no-2011612-07102021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-zoletic-and-others-v-azerbaijan-application-no-2011612-07102021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Even in the absence of a formal complaint, the repeated notifications of trafficking elements to authorities and broader awareness of migrant worker abuse reported in international resources (ECRI, GRETA reports) triggered a duty to investigate. Howe...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T15:54:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos, Case C-280/21, 12/01/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-pi-v-migracijos-departamentas-prie-lietuvos-respublikos-vidaus-reikalu-ministerijos-case-c-28021-12012023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-pi-v-migracijos-departamentas-prie-lietuvos-respublikos-vidaus-reikalu-ministerijos-case-c-28021-12012023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court of Justice held that defending personal interests against illegally acting non-state actors due to state corruption can be regarded as ‘political opinion’ under Directive 2011/95 if perceived as opposition by the persecuting actors.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T15:12:11+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE, Case C-768/19, 09/09/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-se-case-c-76819-09092021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-bundesrepublik-deutschland-v-se-case-c-76819-09092021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court decides that the relevant point in time to assess the ‘minor’ status of a beneficiary of international protection under the Qualification Directive is the date on which the applicant makes an (informal) application for international protect...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T14:38:59+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - XY v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl, Case C-18/20, 09/09/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-xy-v-bundesamt-fur-fremdenwesen-und-asyl-case-c-1820-09092021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-xy-v-bundesamt-fur-fremdenwesen-und-asyl-case-c-1820-09092021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[New elements or findings which have arisen or have been presented by the applicant in subsequent applications can consist, on the one hand, of those which have arisen after the decision became final, and, on the other hand, of those which have not be...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T14:23:07+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - ASGI and Others v Presidency of the Council of Ministers and Ministry of Economy and Finance, Case C-462/20, 28/10/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-asgi-and-others-v-presidency-of-the-council-of-ministers-and-ministry-of-economy-and-finance-case-c-46220-28102021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-asgi-and-others-v-presidency-of-the-council-of-ministers-and-ministry-of-economy-and-finance-case-c-46220-28102021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Member States may exclude single permit holders, EU Blue Card holders, and long-term residents from a family discount card scheme, provided the card is not classified as "social security," "social assistance," or "social protection" under national la...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T14:09:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU (Grand Chamber) - European Commission v Hungary, Case C-821/19, 16/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-grand-chamber-european-commission-v-hungary-case-c-82119-16112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-grand-chamber-european-commission-v-hungary-case-c-82119-16112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU found that national legislation cannot introduce a new inadmissibility ground for applications for international protection that is not already included in the list of inadmissibility grounds in Directive 2013/32. In addition, the CJEU ruled...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-29T13:20:24+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU (Grand Chamber) - LW v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Case C-91/20, 09/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-grand-chamber-lw-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-9120-09112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-grand-chamber-lw-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-9120-09112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court of Justice held that Directive 2011/95 does not preclude a Member State from granting refugee status to a minor through one of his parents, even though there is no risk of persecution in case of removal to his country of nationality (Tunisi...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T13:38:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU (Grand Chamber) - X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, Case C-69/21, 22/11/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-grand-chamber-x-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-case-c-6921-22112022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-grand-chamber-x-v-staatssecretaris-van-justitie-en-veiligheid-case-c-6921-22112022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Return Directive precludes the adoption of a return decision when the person concerned is suffering from a serious illness and there are substantial grounds to believe that their pain would significantly increase if returned, because effective tr...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-07T13:28:53+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom - Court of Appeal (Civil Division), The Queen (on the application of D4) (Notice of Deprivation of Citizenship) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case No. CA-2021-000739, 26/01/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/united-kingdom-court-of-appeal-civil-division-the-queen-on-the-application-of-d4-notice-of-deprivation-of-citizenship-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-case-no-ca-2021-000739-26012022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/united-kingdom-court-of-appeal-civil-division-the-queen-on-the-application-of-d4-notice-of-deprivation-of-citizenship-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-case-no-ca-2021-000739-26012022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The application of the concept of ‘deemed notice’, used when the person's whereabouts or address are not known in a case on deprivation of citizenship, was found to be ultra vires since reasonable steps to reach the individual were not taken.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-27T11:31:07+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Switzerland - Federal Administrative Court, Case No. E-6310/2017, 15/01/2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-case-no-e-63102017-15012020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/switzerland-federal-administrative-court-case-no-e-63102017-15012020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case examines whether the rejection of the complainant’s application for asylum is lawful and if he may be deported. He can only be deported if he does not face inhuman or degrading treatment in his country of origin. In addition, his social netw...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-27T11:07:55+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Netherlands - Council of State, Administrative Jurisdiction Division, Case No. 201810377/2/V3, 12/01/2022]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-jurisdiction-division-case-no-2018103772v3-12012022" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/netherlands-council-of-state-administrative-jurisdiction-division-case-no-2018103772v3-12012022</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[In a case concerning a foreign national who had a valid refugee status in Germany, the Dutch Secretary of State ordered them to leave the country and placed her in detention in view of returning her to Germany. The Council of State found that the fir...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-27T10:21:10+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[United Kingdom - High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland, Queen’s Bench Division (Judicial Review), JR 184, [2021] NIQB 98, 02/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/united-kingdom-high-court-of-justice-in-northern-ireland-queens-bench-division-judicial-review-jr-184-2021-niqb-98-02112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/united-kingdom-high-court-of-justice-in-northern-ireland-queens-bench-division-judicial-review-jr-184-2021-niqb-98-02112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Given that the Secretary of State used the same materials in the first and in the review decisions, the High Court found that the Secretary of State did not comply with the standard of review in re-evaluating the case at hand.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-27T08:26:20+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany - Federal Administrative Court, Case No. BVerwG 1 C 4.21, 25/11/2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/germany-federal-administrative-court-case-no-bverwg-1-c-421-25112021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-federal-administrative-court-case-no-bverwg-1-c-421-25112021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Federal Administrative Court found that Art. 3 of the Qualification Directive does not hinder Member States to allow parents and siblings, fulfilling the requirements for family members under Art. 2(j) of the Directive, to change their status of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-27T07:57:51+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - Milkiyas Addis v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Case C-517/17, 16/07/2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/cjeu-milkiyas-addis-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-51717-16072020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/cjeu-milkiyas-addis-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-case-c-51717-16072020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The CJEU ruled that Articles 14 and 34 of the Recast Qualifications Directive must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that a failure to comply with the obligation to give a personal interview to an international protecti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-08-11T11:05:22+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Poklikayew v. Poland, Application No. 1103/16, 22/06/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-poklikayew-v-poland-application-no-110316-22062023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-poklikayew-v-poland-application-no-110316-22062023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case raises an issue under Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention and concerns the expulsion of the applicant (a lawfully resident alien) on the grounds of national security. The applicant complained that the reasons for the revocation of...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-08T12:29:40+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Alhowais v. Hungary, Application No. 59435/17, 02/02/2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-alhowais-v-hungary-application-no-5943517-02022023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-alhowais-v-hungary-application-no-5943517-02022023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Court found Hungary in violation of procedural aspects of Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR, as well as a substantive violation of Article 2 in relation to the death of the applicant’s brother during a border control operation. The Court rejected the...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-09-08T13:05:01+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Germany, CJEU, J.B. and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, C 364/22, 25 May 2023.]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/germany-cjeu-jb-and-others-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-36422-25-may-2023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/germany-cjeu-jb-and-others-v-bundesrepublik-deutschland-c-36422-25-may-2023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Rejection of the re-application of Lebanese nationals as inadmissible "subsequent applications" under Directive 2013/32/EU.]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-16T15:17:21+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - Muhammad Saqawat v. Belgium, Application no. 54962/18, 2020]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-affaire-muhammad-saqawat-v-belgium-application-no-5496218-2020" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-affaire-muhammad-saqawat-v-belgium-application-no-5496218-2020</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The situation in which an appeal by a foreigner against a detention decision is declared ‘without object’, solely on the ground that a new detention order has been issued, does not offer the guarantees of effectiveness and promptness required by arti...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-18T07:40:28+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR - M.A. v. Denmark, Application no. 6697/18, 2021]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ecthr-ma-v-denmark-application-no-669718-2021" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ecthr-ma-v-denmark-application-no-669718-2021</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Except for very limited exceptions, the statutory three-year waiting period for family reunification of persons granted ‘temporary protection’ does not allow for an individualised assessment of the interest of family unity in light of the concrete si...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-16T14:41:35+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, J.B. v. Greece, Application no.  54796/16, 26 May 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/jb-v-greece-application-no-5479616-26-may-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/jb-v-greece-application-no-5479616-26-may-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerns the potential removal of a Syrian national of Armenian origin and Christian denomination from Greece to Türkiye under the EU-Türkiye Statement of 18 March 2026, following the rejection of his asylum claim on safe third country groun...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-09T14:56:03+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[ECtHR, Y.F.C. and Others v. The Netherlands, Application no. 21325/19, 21 April 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/yfc-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-no-application-no-2132519-21-april-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/yfc-and-others-v-the-netherlands-application-no-application-no-2132519-21-april-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The case concerns seven Venezuelan nationals who arrived in Curaçao in April 2019 and were placed in immigration detention following refusal of entry and removal orders. The Court found a violation of Article 3 ECHR in relation to the use of force du...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-10-09T15:26:55+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women - Z.E. and A.E. v. Switzerland, 171/2021, 4 July 2025]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/committee-on-the-elimination-of-discrimination-against-women" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/committee-on-the-elimination-of-discrimination-against-women</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The Committee, invoking the principle of non-refoulement and recognising gender-based violence as discrimination under Article 1 of the Convention, determined that removing the author to Greece would violate Articles 2 (c)-(f), 3, and 12 of the Conve...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:50:00+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[(France) Judiciary Tribunal of Perpignan, 18th March 2020, No RG20/00356]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/france-judiciary-tribunal-of-perpignan-18th-march-2020-no-rg2000356" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/france-judiciary-tribunal-of-perpignan-18th-march-2020-no-rg2000356</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Due to the COVID-19 health crisis, and especially the cancellation of flights to the applicant’s country of origin, the continuation of immigration detention is no longer required because an effective return cannot be considered anymore as a reasonab...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-28T13:03:25+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[(France) Court of Appeal of Rouen, Jurisdiction of the first president, 10th April 2019, No RG 19/15556]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-appeal-rouen-jurisdiction-of-the-first-president" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-appeal-rouen-jurisdiction-of-the-first-president</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The detention to facilitate the return is used if the return is considered as a reasonable prospect. The period in immigration detention must correspond only to the time which is strictly necessary for the enforcement of the return measure. The lack...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-28T12:58:19+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Council of Alien Law Litigation, 7th April 2020, X v. General Commissioner for Refugees and Stateless persons, No 234.935]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/council-of-alien-law-litigation-7th-april-2020-x-v-general-commissioner-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-no-234935" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/council-of-alien-law-litigation-7th-april-2020-x-v-general-commissioner-for-refugees-and-stateless-persons-no-234935</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When national administrations assess a request for international protection, they must take more precautions when investigating the credibility of facts from the applicant’s story in case of post-traumatic stress and female genital mutilation.The aut...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-28T12:53:28+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Council of State, 24th June 2020, X and Y v. General Commissioner for refugees and stateless persons, No 247.889]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/council-of-state-litigation-section-with-y-houyet-president-of-chamber-nvan-laer-counsel-of-state-l-donnay-counsel-of-state" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/council-of-state-litigation-section-with-y-houyet-president-of-chamber-nvan-laer-counsel-of-state-l-donnay-counsel-of-state</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[By not considering the argument on the applicants’ political conviction in Belgium and by avoiding answering the argument requesting a report on the Turkish authorities’ influence in Belgium, the Council for Alien Law Litigation failed to give a comp...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-28T12:41:01+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Federal Administrative Tribunal (Court VI), A. v. SEM, 11 February 2020, F-7195/2018]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-gregor-chatton-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-andreas-trommer-as-judges" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-gregor-chatton-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-andreas-trommer-as-judges</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A Dublin transfer to Bulgaria is annulled due to the vulnerability of the applicant combined with the risk of inadequate psychological treatment in Bulgaria, the applicant’s first country of asylum, and the lack sufficient individual guarantees in ca...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T15:11:39+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[Federal Administrative Tribunal (Court V), A. v. SEM, 28th October 2020, E-3822/2019]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-the-judges-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-president-david-r-wenger-camilla-mariethoz-wyssen-susanne-genner-muriel-beck-kadima" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/federal-administrative-tribunal-with-the-judges-emilia-antonioni-luftensteiner-president-david-r-wenger-camilla-mariethoz-wyssen-susanne-genner-muriel-beck-kadima</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The State Secretariat of Migration (SSM) is obliged to assess the proportionality of a cessation measure in a case of a granted temporary residence in Switzerland. It was concluded that the cessation of temporary residence is not proportionate, when...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T14:38:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[France, Court of Appeal of Douai, 19 February 2019, X v. Prefect of Pas de Calais, No RG19/00334]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/court-of-appeal-of-douai" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/court-of-appeal-of-douai</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[A medical examination to assess vulnerability was requested by an applicant in administrative detention. This demand was not examined by the doctor in charge in the detention facility. Therefore, the court of appeal refused an extension of the applic...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T14:00:34+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[European Court of Human Rights, A.A. v. Switzerland, 5 November 2019, n°32218/17]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/european-court-of-human-rights-aa-v-switzerland-5-november-2019-n3221817" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/european-court-of-human-rights-aa-v-switzerland-5-november-2019-n3221817</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[When a national authority assesses the likely persecution of an applicant for religious purposes in case of return to his/her country of origin, the national authority must evaluate, inter allia, the way the applicant will live his/her faith in his/h...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-05-22T12:41:27+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-756/21 X v International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others, 29 June 2023]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/ireland-european-court-of-justice-first-chamber-x-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-and-others-c-75621-29-june-2023" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/ireland-european-court-of-justice-first-chamber-x-v-international-protection-appeals-tribunal-and-others-c-75621-29-june-2023</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/83 requires the determining authority, under its duty of cooperation, to obtain up-to-date country of origin information and, where relevant, a medico-legal report on the applicant’s mental health; a breach of that duty...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:30:42+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
            <entry>
            <title><![CDATA[CJEU - C-718/24 Aleb, 5 February 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" href="https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/summaries/case/bulgaria-cjeu-second-chamber-aleb-c-71824-5-february-2026" />
            <id>https://asylumlawdatabase.eu/bulgaria-cjeu-second-chamber-aleb-c-71824-5-february-2026</id>
            <author>
                <name><![CDATA[EDAL]]></name>
            </author>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[The safe third country ground under Article 33(2)(c) of Directive 2013/32 is optional; an application may be declared inadmissible on that basis even if the applicant qualifies for international protection, but it cannot be rejected as unfounded on t...]]>
            </summary>
                                    <updated>2026-06-01T14:52:01+00:00</updated>
        </entry>
    </feed>
