Case summaries

  • My search
  • Relevant International and European Legislation
    1
Reset
CJEU - CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky, Case C-257/22, 09/11/2023
Country of applicant: Algeria

CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky establishes that the right to remain under the Asylum Procedures Directive (2013/32) completely immunises an applicant from being classified as an illegally staying third-country national under the Return Directive (2008/115). Consequently, a return decision cannot be issued at any point between the submission of an asylum application and the first-instance rejection of that application, even if the return decision concerns a period of illegal stay that occurred before the asylum application was made.

Date of decision: 09-11-2023
Relevant International and European Legislation: Article 4,Art 19.2,Article 9,Article 36,Article 37,Recital (9),Recital (12),Article 2,Article 3,Article 4,Article 5,Article 6,Art 2.1,Art 2.2,Article 3,EN - Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2010/C 83/01 - Art 288,Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2010/C 83/01 - Art 10,Article 267 § 2,Article 267 § 1 (b),Article 78
ECtHR - Muhammad Saqawat v. Belgium, Application no. 54962/18, 2020
Country of applicant: Bangladesh

The situation in which an appeal by a foreigner against a detention decision is declared ‘without object’, solely on the ground that a new detention order has been issued, does not offer the guarantees of effectiveness and promptness required by article 5 §4 of the Convention. 

Date of decision: 30-09-2020
Relevant International and European Legislation: Recital (1),Recital (2),Recital (3),Recital (4),Recital (5),Recital (6),Recital (7),Recital (8),Recital (9),Recital (10),Recital (11),Recital (12),Recital (13),Recital (14),Recital (15),Recital (16),Recital (17),Recital (18),Recital (19),Recital (20),Recital (21),Recital (22),Recital (23),Recital (24),Recital (25),Recital (26),Recital (27),Recital (28),Recital (29),Recital (30),Article 1,Article 2,Article 3,Article 4,Article 5,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,1.,2.,Article 11,Article 12,Article 13,Article 14,1.,1. (a),1. (b),2.,2. (a),2. (b),3.,4.,5.,6.,6. (a),6. (b),1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,Article 18,Article 19,Article 20,Article 21,Article 22,Article 23,Art 5.1 (f),Art 5.4,Article 8
CJEU – Case C-181/16 Gnandi, 19 June 2018
Country of applicant: Togo

Member States can issue a return decision together with, or right after, a negative decision on an asylum application at first instance, as long as they ensure that all judicial effects of the return decision are suspended during the time allowed to appeal and pending that appeal.

During that period, and despite being subjected to a return decision, an asylum applicant must enjoy all the rights under the Reception Conditions Directive. The applicant can rely upon any changes in circumstances affecting his claim that came up after the return decision, before the appeals authority.

Date of decision: 19-06-2018
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 39,Art 7,Art 33.1,Recital 2,Recital 8,Recital (9),Article 46,Recital (2),Recital (4),Recital (6),Recital (8),Recital (9),Recital (12),Recital (24),Article 2,Article 3,Article 6,Article 7,Article 8,Article 9,Article 13,1.,Article 2,Article 3
CJEU - C-562/13, Centre public d’action sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-La-Neuve v Moussa Abdida
Country of applicant: Nigeria

The CJEU ruling concerned the scope of protection available under EU law to third country nationals suffering from serious illness whose removal would amount to inhuman or degrading treatment. The CJEU surmisedthat the removal of a person suffering a serious illness to a country where appropriate treatment was not available could in exceptional circumstances be contrary to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, and in such circumstances their removal had to be suspended pursuant to Directive 2008/115/EC on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. The Directive 2008/115/EC required the provision of emergency health care and essential treatment of illness to be made available to such persons during the period in which the Member State is required to postpone their removal.

Date of decision: 18-12-2014
Relevant International and European Legislation: Art 1,Art 2,Art 3,Art 3,Article 1,Article 2,Article 3,Article 4,Article 19,Article 20,Article 21,Article 47,Article 3,Recital (2),Recital (12),Article 3,Article 5,Article 9,Article 13,Article 14,Article 3,Article 13